Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu 10.10 Multitouch Support Demo

Timothy found a news report and a little video demonstrating the multi-touch capabilities of Ubuntu. It's attached below if you're curious what the new Unity Netbook UI is looking like these days.

23 of 104 comments (clear)

  1. Best looking dead OS I've seen by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Funny

    For a dead operating system there are some exciting advancements coming out.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Best looking dead OS I've seen by CnlPepper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about bitching about it once they have it finished?

    2. Re:Best looking dead OS I've seen by Elbowgeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      As soon as Lotus won't run ;-)

      (Yes it's still out there, marketed under the Smartsuite label from IBM)

      --
      Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
  2. Patent Violations Galore by aardwolf64 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm pretty sure that video broke 2-3 patents that were just granted to Apple. Apple should totally sue them and take 10% of their revenue from selling downloads of Ub... Nevermind.

  3. Nifty by Hatta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's pretty good so far. Hopefully we can configure the icon bar on the left to hide by default the same way you can hide the task bar on any desktop. Speaking of the task bar, how is task switching accomplished on this thing? I may have missed it in the video. Is there a gesture that does the same thing as Alt-TAB?

    My biggest concern, what happens when you want(yes, want) to use the terminal?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Nifty by somersault · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's pretty good so far. Hopefully we can configure the icon bar on the left to hide by default the same way you can hide the task bar on any desktop.

      Probably. I use Docky set to autohide, it would work fine with a touchscreen.

      Speaking of the task bar, how is task switching accomplished on this thing? I may have missed it in the video. Is there a gesture that does the same thing as Alt-TAB?

      If you can do the expose style view with multitouch, I don't see why you couldn't set the alt-tab style switch in compiz to use the same gesture.

      My biggest concern, what happens when you want(yes, want) to use the terminal?

      Same as when you want to type anything else in? Use the onscreen keyboard, or connect up an external one..

      --
      which is totally what she said
  4. Touchscreen keyboard? by spiffydudex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One thing that wasn't mentioned in the article text or accompanying video that I am curious about, how does text input work? When a text bar or area is activated does it bring up a keyboard?

    1. Re:Touchscreen keyboard? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That video had an awful lot of editing ... and some 'instant response' from the device ... almost like the commercials for iDevices & Droids on TV. It would have been nice to see a longer video with the actual response times for everything. I'm just sayin'

    2. Re:Touchscreen keyboard? by Again · · Score: 2, Informative

      That video had an awful lot of editing ... and some 'instant response' from the device ... almost like the commercials for iDevices & Droids on TV. It would have been nice to see a longer video with the actual response times for everything. I'm just sayin'

      Yeah, definitely a lot of editing. When I run the Unity interface on my lowly netbook, it is very sluggish. Click... wait... should I click again...? wait... yes... oops, it just popped up and went away quickly... click again... wait... I didn't use it for very long before going back to my regular interface. Of course, the device in the video may be a whole lot more powerful than my netbook but I thought that the Unity interface was "optimized" for the netbook.

      But I want to say that the video looks very nice. The marketing teem did a very good job putting together a very nice, short video.

  5. That's great but... by imgod2u · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One of the important UI changes about a touch-only interface is that things such as managing the filesystem, arranging folders and icons, etc. are too cumbersome to do in the traditional navigator window type of interface.

    iOS just gets rid of it altogether whereas Android limits you to handling files via applications. Unless they've managed to come up with a proper auto-categorization and file organizer -- such that I don't need to go through folders to get to a media file I want to play -- this will still be a cumbersome desktop OS with a touch UI "layer" on top.

    1. Re:That's great but... by yelvington · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just do like I do. All your files on your desktop. :-)

    2. Re:That's great but... by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A meta data tagging system combined with search should work wonders for organization, if only people would actually tag their files so they can find them later.

      Auto categorization has sever limits, it can distinguish between file type, do keyword search on known text files and possibly use face recognition to distinguish between scenes and portraits or gps meta data to filter photos by location, but anything more than that is going to be impossible. It is impossible because it not only requires strong AI, but because it requires strong AI that knows how you would categorize things.

  6. Tabs, not windows by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it looks great, but I can't help but think that using application windows like on a regular desktop is maybe a step backwards for multitouch tablet devices. Sure, people are familiar with opening and maximizing or minimizing windows, but the buttons for such windows are small compared to the rest of the screen and hard to hit with clumsy fingers (especially mine). It's nice that the Unity desktop has the vertical launch bar on the left side - could this launch bar not be modified to function almost as a tab bar for open applications? That'd be much easier, I think, for touch and gesture based devices. Or, even better, use the Expose style overview mode to switch between windows (as shown in the video) rather than allowing the user to reshape and manipulate windows directly.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
  7. What multi-touch? by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 5, Informative

    I saw no real multi-touch features demonstrated in the video. He just moved the window around with more that one finger. I can do that on any touch screen.

    --

    Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
    1. Re:What multi-touch? by natehoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      There were several multi-touch gestures, but it would have been nice to have him move his hand a little more slowly and make it more obvious which finger(s) were on the screen at any time. For example, he appeared to call up the desktop split view by using two fingers, and tapping all five fingers of one hand on the screen seemed to call up a tasklist or somesuch.

      As the article itself stated, the multi-touch gesture library is very limited at the moment in 10.10, but 11.04 should expand that library considerably.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  8. Re:But Linux on the desktop is dead. by DrgnDancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Portables != Desktop. The article you're referring to also makes a point of pointing out how *well* Linux is doing on portables. This device is more closely related to an iPad than a desktop. That said I have several questions the video doesn't answer. Does this device have a physical keyboard or a virtual one. If it's got a physical KB then they did a fantastic job of hiding the thing while it wasn't being used. If it's got a virtual keyboard I'd really like to see it up as part of the video. Just to get an idea for how much screen real estate it uses and such.

    I've been considering an iPad. Honestly this looks nicer (at any rate more open, which is more important to me on a tablet than a phone), but I'd want to see a lot more than a couple muti-touch gestures to be sold. He really only demonstrates two gestures, mostly he spends the whole video using a single finger to simulate a left-click on static objects. Hardly revolutionary. Can it do pinch zoom? Two finger scrolling or one finger? Will two fingers simulate a right-click? (It's a mostly desktop OS, so unlike in iOS right clicking is probably pretty useful). I'm sure I could find out the answers, but if you're going to make a promo video for "multi-touch" show me some "multi-touching".

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  9. Re:But Linux on the desktop is dead. by natehoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can it do pinch zoom? Two finger scrolling or one finger? Will two fingers simulate a right-click? (It's a mostly desktop OS, so unlike in iOS right clicking is probably pretty useful). I'm sure I could find out the answers, but if you're going to make a promo video for "multi-touch" show me some "multi-touching".

    From the article:

    One of the coolest things though is one that will be experienced by the fewest people at this point – touch. Unity is fully touch-enabled – those big icons are screaming out to have a digit poked at them. But as ever, the boys in the lab, or in this case Duncan McGregor‘s multi-touch team have gone a step further and created a multi-touch ‘gesture’ library. This allows finger combinations to do groovy things like expand and reduce windows, pull up multiple windows in one workspace, and call up the ‘dash’ automatically. These are in 10.10. In 11.04 we will see a lot more.

    So I'd say, no, it doesn't have more than just what they demonstrated

    At least not yet. But you'll probably have a lot of them delivered by, interestingly enough, Natty Narwhal (which is odd because Narwhals don't look like they'd be too interested in multitouch).

    Given that I'm sure the multitouch library will expand even more significantly for 11.10, I'd like to make a suggestion for the name: Omnipotent Octopus.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  10. Re:Didn't Ubuntu Hear? by natehoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, you're just not touching it the right way.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  11. New ubuntu user here by iONiUM · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I recently got an Asus EEE (1001px) netbook as a gift, and it came with Windows 7 starter. Now, I use windows 7 at home (ultimate) and I don't dislike it, but I was very unhappy with starter. You can't even change the background image, I mean, what the fuck.

    Anyways, I used to use linux (I mean, like 10 years ago when I was in highschool I used to use debian and slackware), but haven't really since. I decided to try ubuntu so I did a USB installation and put 10.10 netbook edition. I have to say, it was just as easy (if not easier) than a win7 installation (which I have to do often), and is WAY better on a netbook.

    I think people who say linux is popular on portables are exactly right. It's an awesome fit, and I love it.

  12. Re:But Linux on the desktop is dead. by DrgnDancer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, hey, look... An article. I just sort of watched the embedded video and assumed that was the whole thing. That answers more of my questions, and also tells me that this isn't quite what I was looking for. What I really want is an iPad style device with a full OS on it. I want the full OS to have UI optimized for the small screen real estate (which it looks like this Ubuntu WM is). This is definitely getting there, but I want a different form factor and a much larger gesture library. Maybe in a year or so then...

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  13. Re:How about more info for us drooling noobs by jc42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Funny you should phrase it that way; my main thought while watching the video was "This is a true point-and-drool interface".

    It wasn't until the very end that there was a brief glance at a screen that hinted at the existence of some sort of keyboard somewhere. But that didn't last long enough to scare the keyboard-averse, who are presumably the intended audience.

    I also noticed a curious line around the edges that make it look like one of those screens that rotates and flips to hide a keyboard on the inside of the other half. Does this gadget have a physical keyboard hidden inside? Or, alternatively, does it open up to show a second keyboard on the other half?

    Maybe I should just visit Dell and see if they have any actual info about it. But that might be too close to RTFA, so maybe I shouldn't admit here to every considering doing such a thing.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  14. Re:Awesome by element-o.p. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That happens, regardless of OS (except maybe Mac, but that's only because they strictly limit the hardware that OS-X runs on...). I've had the same problem with drivers that you described when installing Windows on various machines -- my wife's old XP desktop a few years ago, the Win2K3 server I built recently (and that required a freaking *FLOPPY DRIVE* to install 3rd party RAID drivers, sigh...). Sometimes Windows has the right driver built in, sometimes Linux does.

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  15. Unity sucks on netbooks by a_nonamiss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I will say from experience that Unity sucks a big fat one on netbooks. I'm not talking about old netbooks, either. I just bought a brand new HP Mini 210 and an Acer AO532h Both have an Atom N450, which isn't the fastest processor in the world, but Unity runs like a slideshow on both of them. It's supposed to be a distribution optimized for netbooks. The dock is almost unusable because of the lag, and it launches apps slow as hell. The 10.04 netbook interface was much faster and more responsive. Sure Unity is (or could be) slick and pretty, but the netbook remix isn't supposed to be about slick and pretty. It's supposed to be about fast and easy performance on sub-standard hardware.

    I think at this point it might be entirely appropriate to separate the netbook distro from a tablet distro. Tablet PC's have substantially more horsepower than netbooks, the two projects have completely different goals. Why have them in a single distro? On my netbook I ended up hacking in the old netbook interface and it works great, but what I did is out of the reach of most people that the Ubuntu community is trying to attract. If they could get this OS on $250 netbooks from Wal-Mart, maybe the general public would realize that Linux doesn't suck, and isn't hard to use. I shouldn't need to re-compile my kernel to figure that out.

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules