Slashdot Mirror


Assange Denied Swedish Residence On Confidential Reasons

MotorMachineMercenar writes "The Local reports that Julian Assange has been denied a residence permit in Sweden. The WikiLeaks spokesman and Australian citizen applied for residency in August, apparently to gain the freedom of speech protection offered by Swedish laws. When asked about the reasons for the denial, a Swedish official responsible replied, '...secrecy prevails in reference to the grounds for such a decision,' essentially meaning the reasons are confidential. Assange has been recently under investigation for sexual molestation charges, which were withdrawn and then re-instated. WikiLeaks is expected to release up to 400,000 confidential US military documents in the near future, which would be the largest such leak in US history."

4 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. A lesson in assymetric warfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you create a subversive organization it has to be led by someone no one knows except organization cell leaders.

    If you are the "leader" of said organization and it's known externally, you are no longer the leader.

    Otherwise, you are no longer able to do battle assymetrically, they know who you are and you know who they are.

    And yes, the DoD has declared "Cyber" as a theater, meaning information is a weapon, so yes Assange is in every way a public "leader" of a subversive organization to those wikileaks wages war upon.

    Sorry Julian, it's time to find a new job.

  2. Re:Is Julian Assange blacklisted? by julioody · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... Lately it's all about the US government, and the wars. It's not the kind of information that most of us find interesting

    What shocks me to no end is that you're right. I suppose people don't care if it ain't happening on their own backyard. But the apathy of the populace with regards to a war waged for reasons that have so many holes that, to be honest, I think at this point the powers that be don't care if they get busted or not, it just never ceases to amaze me.

  3. Re:Translation by cappp · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Not necessarily. If Assanage wanted to release the exact details of his rejection he's more than free too - but, like with pretty much every government out there, it is against the law for official bodies to discuss the private details of individuals' interactions with the state. This is especially true when considering things like passports, residence, and visas.

    Anyway it need not be quite as cloak and dagger as suggested - the Swedish work permit requires employers to certify that they

    * have advertised the post in Sweden and the EU for at least ten days. (For new recruitment.)
    * offer terms of employment that are equal to those of a Swedish collective agreement or what is customary within the profession or sector
    * give the relevant union organisations the opportunity to express an opinion on the terms of employment in the job offer.

    As far I remember the newspaper that offered him employment didn't advertise the post to anyone else. A purely bureaucratic explanation.

    That’s not to say that Sweden isn’t worried about international repercussions but there are other explanations available. Swedish citizenship includes an assessment of good conduct which I would assume applies in the initial residence application as well.

    The Migration Board requests information regarding this from other authorities: The Enforcement Service (if you have debts)
    The Swedish National Police Board (if you committed a crime or are suspected of doing so) and
    The Security Service (security checks).

    They could also be holding out until all the charges against him have been clarified.

  4. Re:Motives by Oriumpor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let me just use some flashy marketting material:
    Land, Air, Sea, Space and Cyber.
    From the USAA posture statement 2009:

    Why is this important to the Army?
    Cyber intrusions and attacks are a real and emerging threat to national security. The Nation faces a dangerous combination of known and unknown vulnerabilities, capable adversaries, and limited situational awareness. It is critical for the Army to grow its cyberspace operations to counter adversary targeting of both our information and our information infrastructure. To maintain our dominance in cyberspace the Army will continue to grow our abilities to better defend our own networks and have capabilities in place to conduct network warfare against adversary networks.

    Guess what with just that basic research I can tell you: according to that philosophy Wikileaks is an adversary, and Jullian Assange likely qualifies as an enemy of the state.