Slashdot Mirror


Batteries Smaller Than a Grain of Salt

An anonymous reader writes "Lithium-ion batteries have become ubiquitous in today's consumer electronics — powering our laptops, phones, and iPods. Research funded by DARPA is pushing the limits of this technology and trying to create some of the tiniest batteries on Earth, the largest of which would be no bigger than a grain of sand. These tiny energy storage devices could one day be used to power the electronics and mechanical components of tiny micro- to nano-scale devices."

9 of 68 comments (clear)

  1. non removable? by pablo_max · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple would still make it un-replaceable ;)

    Seriously though, would it not be even more interesting if something useful existed that could make use of these batteries?

    1. Re:non removable? by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      would it not be even more interesting if something useful existed that could make use of these batteries?

      Light bulbs were pretty useless until there were generators. You can't have something useful that depends on something that doesn't exist.

  2. Re:Why not use in batteries for gadgets? by GlyphedArchitect · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would that not just be a regular battery?

  3. Re:Why not use in batteries for gadgets? by natehoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because the most efficient batteries are the ones that aren't a bunch of teeny batteries all wired together into a larger one. You have all that wasted space, weight, and resistance loss due to all of the connectors. If this scaled, it would be best used in larger batteries.

    And, from TFA, they are trying to match current densities, not improve on them. Take your 1Ah battery and replace it with 1,000 1mAh batteries that take up the same space, and now you have to connect 1,000 batteries together to come up with the same 1Ah battery. It's larger, heavier, more complex to build, and doesn't last any longer. It's about as logical as trying to get enough rechargeable button batteries to start your car. Sure, you could do it, but it's gonna be a lot bigger, heavier, expensive, and more prone to failure than your current battery.

    The sole purpose of something like this is to power very tiny devices where there's no room for a full-sized battery. It's not improving energy density or efficiency.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  4. Re:Why not use in batteries for gadgets? by Dakman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The batteries in TFA are more dense, and have a higher capacity for storage in smaller amounts.

  5. Re:You know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    YEAHHH!!

  6. Ok... by i_b_don · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They've got this already... they're called capacitors. Ok, they're not smaller than a grain of salt, but an 0201 package is really fricken small.

    Do you really need the greater power density you get from a chemical reaction rather than a capacitor at those sizes? A capacitor is so much easier to fabricate and charge that I can't imagine why you would go for a battery. I mean, in order to charge a battery, you'd need a chip that is MUCH larger than a grain of salt... although even for a cap you'd want a voltage regulator of some sort.

    Maybe I'm missing something here. What is this for? Nano-machines? Nano listening devices? Nano-trackers? Now that seems like the really interesting question....

    d

    --
    all language nazi's will burne in heil!
  7. Re:Sand or salt? by Klinky · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The proper measurement is actually metric asstons...

  8. SALT GRAIN BATTERIES USED FOR SURVEILLANCE! by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Slashdot could have gotten more readers with this headline:

    SALT GRAIN BATTERIES USED FOR SURVEILLANCE!

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)