Slashdot Mirror


Interop Returns 16 Million IPv4 Addresses

klapaucjusz writes "Every discussion about IPv4 address exhaustion prompts comments about whether Apple (or MIT, or UCB, or whoever) needs all of those addresses. Interop has set the example by returning 16 million IPv4 addresses to the ARIN pool, extending the IPv4 address exhaustion deadline by a whole month."

4 of 270 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Plenty more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nortel has more than the 47.X class-A that they
            could reasonably give back. They have a sizeable
            flotilla of class-B and class-C networks that
            they acquired through M&A over time as well.

    When I worked there, I made more than one attempt
            to see if we could give some of it back. But
            alas, internal politics were an insurmountable
            force.

  2. Re:Delaying the inevitable by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Informative

    We've known this was coming for years. Do you really think adding on another month is going to do a single thing?

    Yep, it will add another month. That is a single thing.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  3. Also it doesn't have to be a hard switch by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    IPv4 and IPv6 can peacefully coexist. They already do on many networks and you don't know it. As I noted in another post, in domains this already happens. If you have Windows Server 2008 or R2 and Vista or 7 they'll just start doing IPv6 by themselves. When I look at the DNS for our AD a lot of hosts have A and AAAA records. You don't even know which IP you are using when you key in their name to ask for them. We didn't set any of this up, the OSes just have IPv6 stacks on them enabled and it all happens.

    Now not everything is nearly that simple, of course, but it demonstrates how easily they can coexist. So what is more likely to happen is that as IPv4 runs out and places hit in to limits, IPv6 will be used for new stuff. Maybe all new desktops are IPv6 only. Old equipment will keep operating on IPv4 and servers, that have both 4 and 6 can talk to both. As time goes on the IPv4 will become less and less important. Equipment will get replaced and eventually it'll be all IPv6, save for a smattering of legacy systems here and there.

    It is not a situation where you have to switch from 4 to 6. You can do both at the same time, no problem.

  4. Re:Probably awhile by arivanov · · Score: 4, Informative

    The ASICs and the entire routers for that matter in the usual suspects (Cisco, Juniper & Co) have had stable IPv6 support for more than 7-8 years now.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/