Slashdot Mirror


HULC Robotic Exoskeleton MK II Undergoing Tests

fergus07 writes "Lockheed Martin is putting an updated, ruggedized version of its HULC Robotic Exoskeleton through lab evaluation tests. The hydraulic 'power-suit,' which enables the wearer to carry up to 200 lbs and run at 10 mph, now boasts better protection from the elements, improved fitting and easier adjustment, increased run-time and new control software."

8 of 72 comments (clear)

  1. Do Want! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I still want one. At 57 with a back that limits where I can go - a likely stripped down version that could assist hike 10 - 20 miles before recharging would be something I'd pay 4 figures for.

    Screw the flying car, this thing could take off!

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  2. Re:Why? by Sprouticus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ask anyone in the military, there is A LOT of time spent carrying stuff from point A to point B. loading and unloading equipment takes a great deal of effort. Think the aliens scene where they use the lifters to load the dropship.

  3. Problem with forklifts is... by denzacar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's never one around when you need to pull a wounded man out of the battlefield and then carry him to a field hospital.

    Also, they can be a bitch to get up a a stairway.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  4. Re:Sorry to disapoint you lads by IrquiM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We Europeans actually get out of our recliners and out into the wild now and then!

    --
    This is blinging
  5. Re:Where is the shoulder mount? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why are those things necessary?

    If you look at "kill ratios", the US soldier (moreso the US Marine) is quite effective as it stands.

    A HUD with targeting/fire control wouldn't prove entirely useful until Friend/Foe systems are worked out to the point of being infallible.

    You're not going to get any vertical launch munitions with a mere 200lb payload, and they wouldn't be terribly effective without substantial control systems. (For instance, SAW alone is going to weigh in at 20lb or so. Ammo for that is going to be another 50lb-100lb. Add in gyros for stabilizing and aiming/etc. controls, and you're looking at the full support weight of the system. It's never good to design to the system's maximum capabilities.)

    And, guess what? All that would rely on vertical support systems, and communication with them. If you're sending data to request data, the enemy can detect your location. The ability to detect your enemy's location is a big part of being able to effectively kill them.

    What this will do is making existing soldiers more capable on their own. They will have motorized assistance to carry their 80lb rucks, so they will be able to do everything they do today - faster, more agilely, and for a longer period of time - without being exhausted in combat.

    For this thing to be effective in combat, what they need to do now is figure out a means to make it self-carrying (say, a 'low power' mode that would only support its own weight + a little, relying on the soldier to do the rest, combined with solar trickle charging), and improve its ability to hold things independently/not use those stupid pads. This way it'd improve effectiveness without actually interfering when not directly in use. (Soldiers spend a lot more time just standing around and walking than they do fighting. Something that just adds weight during this period of time will be quickly discarded/taken off, even if it's effective at other times.)

    Short term, the linked Raytheon XOS2 looks like it'd be more useful, short-medium term. Think: the skid loaders in Aliens. You'd be able to (as a group of 3-5 men, say) quickly and easily move 500lb to 1/2-ton crates on and off vehicles and the like. 30 cal or 50 cal cans would take a single person, and they'd be able to move them quickly.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  6. Re:Mass produced exoskeleton by Missing.Matter · · Score: 4, Funny

    The company's name is actually Cyberdyne? Why would you even tempt fate like that?

  7. Re:WWI by denzacar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Back then, soldiers with PTSD used to be shot or left to die in no-man's-land for cowardice.
    You will recognize that the world has changed a bit in last 100 years? On AND off the battlefield.

    Giving troops their own robot-suits makes each soldier that much more expensive when the drone takes them out.

    Good!

    Maybe then less soldiers will be sent out there to die for no reason.

    If your mission plan requires the troops to carry 200lbs of equipment themselves then whomever wrote that plan needs to be shot.

    They are already regularly hauling around 100 pounds of gear.
    1/3rd of it being just clothes, basic armor (helmet), weapon and ammo they are wearing.

    With exoskeleton, they can move under full gear as they would with only the basic gear while not wearing the exoskeleton.
    And again... You can't get vehicles to every place where you need soldiers who in turn need increased mobility.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  8. Eenie meenie miney moe by arielCo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Troll Interesting Flamebait ... none

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.