Has Christopher Nolan Turned the 3D Argument?
brumgrunt writes "Not only has Christopher Nolan resisted pressure to make his third Batman film, The Dark Knight Rises, in 3D, but his explanation is very much centered on it being the right decision to suit the film. With Harry Potter (temporarily) abandoning 3D too, has Hollywood's latest bandwagon hit the skids already?"
has Hollywood's latest bandwagon hit the skids already?
I sure as hell hope so.
Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
I refuse to see any movie in 3d, because it's hard on my eyes and most of the conversions are terrible. As a result with some movies being hard to find in 2d, I spend $0 on them. Hollywood is doing a good job of saving me money, and I hope they convert everything in sight so I have no reason to ever visit a movie theatre again.
-- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
There's infinite money to be made in selling air! Our profit margins are infinite! etc. This is what people tell themselves. And then comes the reality.
Well, we can still make it up on volume!
Until you can lie on the floor and look up Emma Watson's skirt you mean.
with the fourth dimension being TIME
get this: the 3D image CHANGES over time such that the illusion of...
um, nevermind
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
And your point is?
If you aren't part of the solution, then there is good money to be made prolonging the problem