Slashdot Mirror


2010 Election Results Are In

The election results are in, and there are one trillion web pages now up helping you find out what happened. The short story is that the Republicans cleaned up, although the Democrats maintain a one-seat majority in the Senate. The GOP now has 239 seats in the house, giving them a huge lead over the Dems' 183.

14 of 1,530 comments (clear)

  1. It's not a competition! by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 5, Funny

    Theoretically, it shouldn't matter what party is in power. Each representative should vote in a manner that is consistent with the best interests of their constituents. Right? Right?

  2. Re:The real winners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ROI for their investments.

    Yes, they truly treat congress like an ATM machine.

  3. Oh great... by scourfish · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're simply swapping from ineffective democrats that want to take my guns away and give all my money to the lobbyist interests to ineffective republicans that want to take my aborted fetuses away and give all my money to the lobbyist interests. Progress is zero sum.

  4. Re:People want fear, not facts by dragonhunter21 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You make a good point. We shouldn't allow ourselves to be swayed by fear tactics. We should think through the issues, and make careful, reasoned deci-

    OHMIGOD NET NEUTRALITY AAAAAGH

    --
    Sent from my CR-48
  5. Re:first? by OakDragon · · Score: 2, Funny

    A couple of relevant quotes from last night's losers, of either party:

    "The voters have spoken, and if that's what they want - the hell with them." - Ted Baxter

    "The people have spoken, the bastards." - Dick Tuck

  6. Revkin sees threat to science by mdsolar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Andy Revkin, former NYT science reporter, sees a threat to science in the election results. http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/03/the-real-threat-to-science-in-the-new-political-climate/

    1. Re:Revkin sees threat to science by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Funny

      Andy Revkin, Democratic Party shill on science, sees a threat to science in the election results. http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/03/the-real-threat-to-science-in-the-new-political-climate/

      There fixed that for ya.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  7. Re:Should be good for the economy by JackieBrown · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah. And Bush was further left than Kennedy and Harry Roosevelt.

    And blue is green and up is down...

  8. Re:Should be good for the economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Democrats are demonized for trying to stick to theirs

    Then don't have demonic principles in the first place. Problem solved.

  9. Re:HUGE mandate! by penguin_dance · · Score: 2, Funny

    HUGE mandate.... of course knowing some Repubs, they're probably actually hoping for a "man date".

    No...that would be Barney Frank....

    --
    If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
  10. Re:Should be good for the economy by alta · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, balanced stories from mediamatters? Here, let me go get a counter argument from Glenn Becks website...

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  11. Re:Should be good for the economy by mooingyak · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why don't you guys just ban filibustering?

    That'd be a terrible idea. It's one of our key tools in introducing gridlock. Remove it and they'll get more done, which is extremely bad.

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  12. Re:Gridlock FTW by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Republicans are fiscally more responsible than the Democrats, just like Ted Kazinski was less insane than Jeffrey Dahmer.

  13. Can we just remove the politics section?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Urge to beat Slashdot's liberal armchair politicians with my autographed Dubya baseball bat rising... RISING!!!

    Can we just remove the politics section? It's like when your favorite actor gets on TV and says something political that you disagree with. You immediately hate them and try to comprehend why their heads are screwed on sideways. The OP is flame bait.

    I'd love to get into how the real world functions and all but I've got a job to do