Slashdot Mirror


Nuclear Bunker Houses World's Toughest Server Farm

Lanxon writes "Deep inside the Swiss Alps, a former nuclear bunker is now the ultimate hiding place for the world's most sensitive secrets — the Swiss Fort Knox. In a lengthy feature, Wired gains access to the server farm designed to survive a full-scale military attack. From the article: 'As we punch our codes at the checkpoint, the yellow door opens into what looks like a city of server towers, their green LEDs flickering as a technician in a white jumpsuit runs diagnostic checks. [Later], we are in a dimly lit tunnel next to what looks like a metal oven door carved into the side of the rock. "These are expansion rooms in case you have an atomic explosion outside," Christoph Oschwald, a retired Swiss paratrooper turned contractor, says. The thinking behind the rooms, he explains, is that if there were a nuclear explosion, the rush of high-pressure air would fill them through vents in the opposite side. Then, the vents would snap shut, trapping the air before it had a chance of damaging the fortress. "There is a lot of protection you can't see," he says. We stroll past an intricate network of insulated pipelines that carry water up from the underground glacial lake to the cooling system.'"

8 of 152 comments (clear)

  1. What secrets do the Swiss have? by orphiuchus · · Score: 5, Funny

    So is this where they store the schematics for their Swiss Army Knives?

  2. Not so tough... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    Might survive a nuclear attack, but not some script kiddie and an admin that likes pictures of Pam Anderson.

    1. Re:Not so tough... by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Reminds me of the Simpson's episode, where Mr. Burns and Smithers go through a series of complex doors to get to the control room, just to discover that someone left the BACK DOOR open, a screen door, flapping in the breeze. Proverbial "a chain is only as strong as its weakest link".

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  3. Glacial lake for cooling? by gatzke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Underground glacial lake for cooling?

    I thought it was the CO2 that was melting the glaciers in Europe, not farmville.

  4. Exactly how often are we going to hear this? by cheros · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is deja vu all over again. First off, if it's not a chain of similar setups you have a single site problem - BLAM goes your redundancy. Secondly, define "nuclear attack". If that means "survive the EMP from a nuclear blast" there would be some value in it, but that's going to be a tad hard to prove without seriously upsetting neighboring Gstaad with radiation :-).

    However, most importantly, this stopped being news several years ago - if this is a new setup it's just yet-another-one, if it's not it's not news either. Some of these setups are quite cute, but the idea isn't exactly novel.

    Ah, got it. The hint is in the article: "Rauber and his team, a public-relations representative" - who paid who for what here?

    Yawn.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  5. Pointless by Leebert · · Score: 4, Informative

    Proper availability is generally achieved through redundancy, not silly stunts like this.

  6. Way down on my list by paiute · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If things get so bad that Switzerland is getting nuked, then my data will be one of the least of my worries.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  7. Re:Hmmm by gman003 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The "infrastructure" seems to be a secure courier handing over hard drives in a lockbox. This is more like offline backup, not online.