The Science of Battlestar Galactica
gearystwatcher writes "TV science adviser Kevin Grazier talks about getting rid of the Trek babble in Battlestar Galactica. From the article: "Grazier's job was to help keep the technology and science real and credible — even when there were some massive leaps. Grazier didn't just make sure that there was a reason for what we saw — bullets instead of lasers — but also that when the science bit did break into the open, it was more mind-blowing than the writers could have conceived — such as when the humans discover their mechanical Cylon persecutors have evolved to look human.'"
I think it would be appropriate. Each subsequent generation corrected faults found in previous generations, for future generations. More of, favorable traits were maintained, and unfavorable traits were discarded.
Or the appropriate definitions
Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
If I were a hot asian female, I would be totally insulted by your comment, But I'm not, so ... cool where can I get one too.
You take a blank robot and download Lucy Liu... or don't you watch science fiction?
When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!