Slashdot Mirror


Chip Allows Blind People To See

crabel writes "3 blind people have been implanted with a retinal chip that allowed them to see shapes and objects within days of the procedure. From the article: 'One of the patients surprised researchers by identifying and locating objects on a table; he was also able to walk around a room unaided, approach specific people, tell the time from a clock face, and describe seven different shades of gray in front of him.'"

32 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Wow by DirtyCanuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    I didn't see that one coming.

    Hearing Implants?

    Nope never heard of them

  2. In the land of the blind... by thijsh · · Score: 2, Funny

    La Forge is king!

    1. Re:In the land of the blind... by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Once again reality has trumped Star Trek with an eye implant -- there's now no reason for La Forge to wear that visor.

      Reality trumped Star Trek with an eye implant before. McCoy gave Kirk reading glasses for his age-related presbyopia because he was allergic to the eye drops that soften the lens (they don't have those... yet). But they've been implanting mechanical lenses since 2003; I have one in my left eye. McCoy could have just beamed Kirk's biological lenses out and beamed the mechanical lenses in. I went from being extremely nearsighted and farsighted at the same time (age related presbyopia), wearing both contacts and reading glasses, to better than 20/20. Of course, since we don't have transporters, invasive surgery is required. This retinal implant would require even more invasive surgery.

      Of all the nerdy devices I have and have had, the implanted lens is my favorite.

      Give them time and this retinal implant may surpass normal vision like the lens implant does.

      Oh yeah -- you will be assimilated! Resistance is futile!

  3. Not a cure (for blindness) by Manip · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just to clarify in case you didn't RTFA this isn't a cure for all forms of blindness. Unfortunately we still aren't at the point of being able to clip a camera on to people and having their brains understand that input directly. But it does somewhat mitigate forms of blindness which are directly associated with the eye (as opposed to the image processing centre which is a common form of blindness). But that being said, this is HUGE. We can cure several kinds of blindness or at least mitigate it. The quality of life increase to the people who receive this new medical technology will simply be like night and day.

    1. Re:Not a cure (for blindness) by janek78 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Could you supply a source on the "[...]image processing centre which is a common form of blindness"? As far as I know, and yes IAAMD, eye-related conditions are by far the most common cause of blindness, whereas cortical blindness represents only a small fraction of the total blind population (significant, no doubt).

  4. This is actually pretty cool by kurokame · · Score: 5, Informative

    Firstly, it's probably going to be 50 years before this turns into an actual medical procedure rather than a proof-of-concept experiment. Let's just get that out of the way.

    So what they're doing is taking people with a defective retina, and adding a synthetic one. The retina normally receives photons and sends a signal along the optic nerve. What they're doing is implanting a silicon photoreceptor behind the retina of people whose retinas aren't doing the job. The chip receives the photons and sends an electrical signal, serving the same function as a "healthy" retina to some fidelity. The results are sort of low-fi since (a) it's just a proof of concept trial, and (b) the retina is a horrendously complex photodetector so it will take a lot of work to approach that in an implantable device. But dude, blind people. Seeing. Go, science!

    1. Re:This is actually pretty cool by fredjh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I recall seeing something like that (low-res BW "implants") at least 5 or more years ago. Someone was actually able to drive a car around a parking lot with one.

      This just seems like a more advanced version, and unlike another poster, I think they should start implanting these now. Why make people wait for more trials? What's the worst that can happen? The person is already blind. This is one of the things that bothers me about the FDA; if people are willing to take the risks to get a "cure" now, they shouldn't be stopped.

      But even still, once surgery to correct lens shape was allowed, that procedure really took off... it didn't take 50 years for it to become commonplace. Certainly this is more invasive, but once it's approved, I really doubt people will let that stand in the way... after all, people who were nearsighted could still see with corrective lenses, but now we're talking about people who can't see at all.

      --
      Stupid, sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:This is actually pretty cool by am+2k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think they should start implanting these now. Why make people wait for more trials? What's the worst that can happen? The person is already blind.

      Well, I'm a complete noob when it comes to medical stuff, but I can think of three things:

      • Permanent damage to the nerves, removing the option for using any future improved version of this implant.
      • Brain damage, since this implant has a direct connection to the most sophisticated instrument known to man. Just send a few milliamps too much over there and it's partially fried.
      • An infection, killing the person (since you can't just cut off the head like it's done with arms and legs in extreme situations).
    3. Re:This is actually pretty cool by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are extrapolating linearly.

      For reference, 50 years ago integrated circuits were still brand new.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:This is actually pretty cool by clone53421 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I can only assume no one's that excited by huge sight-replacing devices with 512 "taxel" resolution*, except as a step toward better things.

      *I've tried to imagine this and even asked Google to come up with an image that showed what this might 'look' like and come up with nothing

      What I found indicated that the 512 taxels are arranged in a 32x16 grid (a 4x2 arrangement of 8x8 separate electrode grids).

      Obviously it’s tactile, not visual, but I took an image off google images, reduced it to 32x16, grayscaled it, and scaled it back up using the Sinc (Lanczos3) method. This was the result.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    5. Re:This is actually pretty cool by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here's an animated gif using the same technique.

      http://yfrog.com/fxlowresmuybridgeracehorsg

  5. First Wu-Tang by LaminatorX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Light is provided through sparks of energy
    from the mind that travels in rhyme form

    Givin sight to the blind

  6. What is it, exactly? by Nirvelli · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Abstract has more technical details, such as the fact that this chip is externally-powered, and has a "38 × 40 pixels" resolution.

    1. Re:What is it, exactly? by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's about what my old Apple 2 computer would do. You could play Zork on your own retina..

    2. Re:What is it, exactly? by just+fiddling+around · · Score: 2, Funny

      The last time there has been an article on the subject, we were at 9x9 pixels. I can infer that some parallel can be made with the general speed of progress in electronics and expect that within a quick decade it will be hi-res and not require too much power to be implanted with day-long batteries.

      Also, inductive charging is quite an elegant solution in this context: no gore, all the joules.

      --
      You're not old until regret takes the place of your dreams.
    3. Re:What is it, exactly? by ultranova · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can infer that some parallel can be made with the general speed of progress in electronics and expect that within a quick decade it will be hi-res and not require too much power to be implanted with day-long batteries.

      Why not simply use a small fuel cell and generate power from glucose and oxygen from bloodstream?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  7. People that 'went blind' by splutty · · Score: 4, Informative

    One caveat that seems to be missing in the summary, is that this was done with people that used to have normal eyesight, which degenerated into blindness.

    Obviously the fact that the brain already recognizes shaped, forms, and knows how to 'see' makes a huge difference.

    For people having been born blind, this sort of research might eventually help, but this would take all the visual stimulation and training that a small child gets as well, with brains that are not that of a small child, so will take a long time to adapt, unfortunately.

    --
    Coz eternity my friend, is a long *ing time.
    1. Re:People that 'went blind' by am+2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I remember seeing a documentary of a study that did exactly that about twenty years ago... That person wore glasses 24/7 that flipped the image upside down. It took a while, but he adapted to it just fine. The problem was that when he took them off afterwards, the image was flipped again, so he had to go through all of it again :)

    2. Re:People that 'went blind' by delinear · · Score: 4, Informative

      Earlier than that - George Stratton was doing this one-hundred and twenty years ago. His experiment involved covering one eye and inverting the image in the other (the apparatus he used at the time was too heavy to do both eyes 24 hours a day). He found after 4-5 days everything looked the right way around, but if he concentrated on objects they would reverse. Other than that he could move around and operate as normal. Upon removing the device it was only a few hours until his sight returned to normal.

  8. Appropriate? by SultanCemil · · Score: 3, Funny

    So is it wrong to goatse someone within a day of the operation?

    --
    Cemil.
  9. It's a miracle! by HertzaHaeon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Stories like these always make me think of how science, technology and development delivers so many of the things promised but undelivered by religion. This story, healing the sick and making the blind see again, is an actual, real miracle, and an awesome one at that. Religion, in contrast, offers only false hope and perhaps some comfort for unfulfilled promises and a harsh reality. And yet so many millions pin their hopes on imagined gods, not human spirit and ingenuity. It continues to baffle me.

    Even the most extreme things promised by religion, eternal life and/or an immortal soul, might be deliverable in some form by science one day. We can certainly create a paradise for ourselves. Compared to how the people who first imagined today's religions lived, one could argue that many of us are already living in paradise (or some beta version of it at least) and it's within reach for every human on earth, regardless of religion, if we continue to produce our own miracles.

  10. Mice by dintech · · Score: 4, Funny

    I assume pre-tests were done on 3 blind mice? /ducks...

  11. Wild. by Spit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not much of a step from here to arbitrary, computer generated input.

    --
    POKE 36879,8
  12. how soon to working Tleilaxu Eyes? by dltaylor · · Score: 2, Interesting
  13. Impressive by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In all honesty, This amazes me, the fact that we have reached a point where we understand enough about both the brain, and computer hardware, that we are able to use hardware to correct problems of this detail and magnitude. Going from totally blind to being able to read a clock has to be an amazing experience.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  14. Re:Blinding by Megane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As someone who is partially color blind, and has taken the "paint pots" test, I can tell you that it effectively only affects shades of brown. In other words, colors that we don't normally have names for.

    The paint pots test is where they put 30 or so 1 inch round thingies on the table with a color sample on top, and you have to arrange them in order of slightly changing color. There are two points around the circle where brownish colors will be the same for those with partial (protanomaly or deuteranomaly) color blindness, or at least that's how it went for whatever form I have. Two of them seemed identical to me, so I think I ended up making a lopsided figure eight.

    And someone who has been blind all their life will have had that part of their brain repurposed to increase the other senses, and have no experience with eyesight, so they probably won't even be able to process the visual cues that let you easily identify depth in a photograph.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  15. Quick! Close the analog hole! by tommituura · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now, how long do you think that it'll be until someone at the various copyright lobbies wants to force a macrovision-like drm technology in there just because someone might someday include video recording capability into artificial eyes?

  16. Yeah, yeah by smchris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems like one researcher or another has been twiddling with technologies like this now and then as one-off's for literally DECADES now. Will it ever make it into an on-going clinic?

    I got an "insightful" for my jaded disillusionment the last time /. reported on one of these experiments, what, maybe five years ago. Can I get another "insightful" for still being disillusioned that these "cool hacks" will ever see production?
     

    1. Re:Yeah, yeah by Toze · · Score: 2, Informative

      iirc, the experiment 5 years ago had a 2X2 pixel resolution that allowed the patient to distinguish between light and dark. This is a considerable improvement. So yes, it will make it into clinical practice. Eventually.

      --
      No OS on the planet can protect itself from a user with the admin password. - Yvan256
    2. Re:Yeah, yeah by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They got it to the point where these folks are no longer blind, so I would expect it to happen in five years or less.

      Note, however, that this isn't a panacea that will cure all blindness, just one form of blindness that only hits 200,000 out of the world's seven billion people.

      What's really amazing is a CrystaLens implant. It's an artificial, mechanical lens that replaces the eye's natural lens, and it cures myopia (nearsightedness), presbyopia (farsightedness), astigmatism, and cataracts. Millions could benefit from that innovation, which was approved by the FDA in 2003.

  17. Correct, evidence from cochlear implants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For people having been born blind, this sort of research might eventually help, but this would take all the visual stimulation and training that a small child gets as well, with brains that are not that of a small child, so will take a long time to adapt, unfortunately.

    Right. Kids who receive cochlear implants at very young ages (best before 5, preferably around 1) and are enrolled in schools mostly focused on speech and hearing (rather than sign) tend to show dramatic results. Most of these kids are mainstreamed into their local school districts in the kindergarten/first/second grades with limited (if any) instructional support. Using the phone with no assistance is pretty typical.

    People, like my wife, who are pre-lingually deaf and receive cochlear implants later in life don't fare nearly as well. The language centers of the brain have developed and you've missed the window for dramatic gains. They still help, but she'll always need captions and alternatives to the phone.

  18. Chip allows blind people to see by homesnatch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Way to go, Chip! I always liked that guy...