Slashdot Mirror


Mob-Sourcing — the Prejudice of Crowds

An anonymous reader writes "ZDNet takes a look at how crowd-moderation can capture and reflect the prejudice of individuals. 'As more web content is crowd-sourced and crowd-moderated, are we seeing only the wisdom of crowds? No, we're also seeing their prejudice. The Internet reflects both the good and ugly in human nature. ... Any system relying on people implicitly encodes prejudices as well. In a world where one politician with a call girl is forced to resign and another is handily reelected, there is no hope for moral or intellectual consistency in crowd-sourced or moderated content.'"

3 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Dead Fish always float only downstream by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes the system you used to post your comment was created by a singular fisherman, that's why it's called the "net". /sarcasm

    I'd hazard a guess that your karma is in the cellar because your Gallileo complex prevents you from fully thinking thru what you are saying.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  2. Re:Dead Fish always float only downstream by catbutt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I disagree with the crowd all the time on slashdot, and yet my karma's pretty good. If you can express your point of view intelligently, it doesn't matter so much if you agree or disagree with "the masses". Slashdot's system is far from perfect, but if you compare it to other online forums, it's clear that a well designed karma system can mine the intelligence from crowds. The fact that wikipedia is pretty good, and that it is hard to out-guess prediction markets are other examples.

  3. Re:Dead Fish always float only downstream by Rakishi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Interesting how you stretch what he said beyond it's meaning in an attempt to support your own point. Good example of how not to post.

    OK, I got it - as long as the dissenting opinions are acceptable and not debunked, they are acceptable.

    Yes, if it's been debunked then it's wrong and as such of low value. Glad to see we're on the same page.

    Of course, if they were acceptable and had been approved by the authorities, they wouldn't be dissenting opinions, would they?

    Yes, the mysterious secret alien authorities running slashdot and sucking out our brains wish to keep you in your place. Now shut up and stand still while they insert the straw.