Slashdot Mirror


Google Give Searchers 'Instant Previews' of Result Pages

First pressing 'Enter' was to much work... now actually clicking on the links and visiting the sites is to much, too... Google is testing instant previews, where you can see a miniature rendered view of the landing page without requiring you to click through and back-arrow.

5 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. There's only one upgrade needed for Google by taustin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And that's to turn off Javascript, which returns it to the original, clean, doesn't-suck-donkey-dick home page with a box to type in the search term and a couple of buttons to click.

  2. -1 Please No! by Rysc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The instant search results are a pain for me. They violate my back button expectations and they interfere with my web searching workflow: I may alter my query in preperation for the next iteration while still scanning the page for links to open in new tabs.

    It also uses excessive bandwidth by searching for me--and causing the page scrollbar to jump around jarringly--when I am not done typing.

    One thing I always liked about Google right from the first is that they're *lightweight* and fast. Clutter free and minimal to the greatest extent possible. I understand with things like the never-ending-image-search and instant results from queries they're trying to compete with the glitz of bing and other so-called competitors, but this seriously hurts the experience for users like me. Please, Google! You don't have to compete on glitz when you have a hands-down superior product!

    --
    I want my Cowboyneal
  3. Just stop it! by RapmasterT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't want to see a single new Google technology until they put the Google image search back to the way it used to be before they shitified it. It's so damned annoying to use now that I'm actually using Bing when I want to search images.

  4. Re:"But I didn't actually VISIT that page" by dirk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Um, yes, I'd hope that Google Instant was censored because who wants to type in something innocent and have it come up with a porn site? Do you really want to be searching for something like "Sexual Harassment Lawsuits" and simply have all the sites for "sex" or "sexual" come up whenever you type them?

    Yes, yes I do.

    --

    "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
  5. It's automation, not laziness! by sco08y · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "First, pressing Enter was too much work..."

    No. Pressing Enter was pointless, and clicking through to the page was pointless. Obviously, if I'm taking the trouble to go to a search engine and type in words, I want to search for them. It's idiotic to have to tell the machine that. Likewise, I don't care about the links, I want the page itself, so it makes sense to pull it up right away.

    The whole point of having a machine is to automate repetitive tasks, and that's what Google is doing here.