Slashdot Mirror


Worker Rights Extend To Facebook, Says NLRB

wjousts writes "American Medical Response of Connecticut had a policy that barred employees from depicting the company 'in any way' on Facebook or other social media. The National Labor Relations Board has ruled that this policy runs afoul of the National Labor Relations Act, which gives employees the right to form unions and prohibits employers from punishing workers for discussing working conditions."

3 of 340 comments (clear)

  1. Re:US Employment Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    No holiday time, no sick leave, no maternity leave, no restrictions on hours worked, no mandated breaks, few health and safety regulations, can be fired without notice or reason, can legally discriminate, etc. It is like working in the third world. Between this and health care the US is low on my list of places I wish to work.

    Dude, you want to pull that head out of your ass?

    No holiday time, no sick leave

    I'll give you the sick leave, but that's because almost everyone blows it on 3-day weekends, and never gets used for the intended purpose.

    no maternity leave, no restrictions on hours worked, no mandated breaks, few health and safety regulations

    FMLA + OSHA, I'll let you look up those two. There are restrictions on hours worked and mandated breaks for non-exempt employees.

    can be fired without notice or reason

    Yeah, this sucks, and it's called at-will employment, but not all states are like this.

    can legally discriminate

    Really? REALLY? Just because it happens and people can get away with it doesn't mean it's legal.

  2. Re:US Employment Rights by silentcoder · · Score: 5, Informative

    This would be the Republic of South Africa.

    What makes it a third world country is this: 43% unemployment, 76% illiteracy, 82% of the population living below the official poverty line (that is below taxable income, with welfare sustainance from the other 18% - who earn salaries comparable to Europe - in fact most of us work for European countries who find they can pay us solid market related salaries and still save truckloads of money because of the favorable exchange rate).

    We have massive poverty, massive problems of all sorts to deal with. But our government relies for it's vote massively on the unions who include most of that 82% poor people as members, if the unions ever tell their members to vote for the opposition - this government couldn't possibly survive an election.
    Result: damn good labour laws, regardless of whether you are in the rich 18% or the poor 82%

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  3. Re:US Employment Rights by ptbarnett · · Score: 4, Informative

    With very few exceptions, no employee consent is ever required as part of a merger/sale/takeover/bankruptcy.

    If employees own a substantial percentage of the stock, it's required.

    The purchasing company can also require that a high percentage of employees accept the offer to work for them before the sale is completed. And no, that's not hypothetical.