UK Politician Arrested Over Twitter 'Stoning Joke'

History's Coming To writes "The BBC is reporting that a Tory city councillor has been arrested over a 'joke' he posted to Twitter suggesting that Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, a UK based writer, be stoned to death. The full tweet read, 'Can someone please stone Yasmin Alibhai-Brown to death? I shan't tell Amnesty if you don't. It would be a blessing, really.' Following complaints he was arrested under the Communications Act 2003 and bailed. He has since apologized. This comes on the same day that a conviction for a Twitter 'joke' about blowing up an airport was upheld."

Comments

Doing in wrong...

[Qzukk]

Obviously he should have phrased it "Won't someone rid me of this meddlesome columnist?"

Re:Asshat

[SirThe]

Maybe, but he still shouldn't be arrested for it!

Re:About The news

[Shikaku]

Can someone please stone spammers to death? I shan't tell Amnesty if you don't. It would be a blessing, really.

Re:Stupid

[TheRaven64]

In the UK, it is illegal to threaten to kill someone. There is no exemption for it being just a joke, because that provides a pretty trivial loophole ('Oh, did he take it seriously officer? I was only joking...').

Nice demonstration of "reasonable restrictions"

[russotto]

...and more specifically, how a law that on the surface seems perfectly reasonable can be so easily misused.

The law is against menacing, the statement -- made publicly, not directed at any given person -- is
"Crap! Robin Hood airport is closed. You've got a week and a bit to get your shit together otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky high!!"

Any sensible person can see there is no threat there, it's just someone being a drama queen. But it violates the letter of the law and it's politically expedient to ignore the obvious.

Similarly,
"Can someone please stone Yasmin Alibhai-Brown to death? I shan't tell Amnesty if you don't. It would be a blessing, really."
is not a serious solicitation to murder; it's just someone being an ass. Or making a point in an offensive way, given that he says he was responding to a comment by Alibhai-Brown that no politician has the right to comment on human rights abuses, including the stoning of women in Iran.

I would presume that this is the program in question, though I haven't listened to it so don't know.

Re:Nice demonstration of "reasonable restrictions"

[russotto]

Maybe he shouldn't make that point in an offensive way?

Your dedication to the principle of freedom of speech is touching.

Maybe he should dispute points and present his opinions.

Maybe that wouldn't be as effective as being nasty.

Or would he rather just slander everyone to death?

There's no slander involved here.

Re:Asshat

[digitig]

Given that Yasmin Alibhai-Brown is a Muslim secularist and campaigner for democracy and women's rights (amongst other things), I think that there is a real chance that there are many who wouldn't see calling for her to be stoned to death as a joke, and there is good reason for the tweet to be considered incitement to violence. Joking about the death of a random celeb is one thing; it's another thing when that person really is already at serious risk of violence.

Re:Is English your third language?

[tverbeek]

"...should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law."

As long as "the full extent of the law" is to require the speaker to live with the the guilt and shame of having said something which inadvertently led to someone's death, I agree with you.