Slashdot Mirror


The Monopolies That Dominate the Internet

Tim Wu has a piece up at the Wall Street Journal pointing out that the free-market, open Internet — "competition in its purest form" — has evolved to be dominated by monopolies. Wu argues that this is nothing new, and that each wave of information technology in the US has followed a similar pattern. "Today's Internet borders will probably change eventually, especially as new markets appear. But it's hard to avoid the conclusion that we are living in an age of large information monopolies. Could it be that the free market on the Internet actually tends toward monopolies? Could it even be that demand, of all things, is actually winnowing the online free market — that Americans, so diverse and individualistic, actually love these monopolies? ... Info-monopolies tend to be good-to-great in the short term and bad-to-terrible in the long term."

5 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. Its not 'internet'. its 'free market'. by unity100 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    free market is what tends towards monopolies eventually. because there is competition, and nothing to prevent the big players from getting bigger, unless they make a HUGE mistake, all 'free' markets only function as free for all initial chaos environments until a hierarchy and order is established. as per the below post :

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1847700&cid=34083272

    1. Re:Its not 'internet'. its 'free market'. by Drasil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed. In a dog-eat-dog world you eventually end up with one very fat dog.

    2. Re:Its not 'internet'. its 'free market'. by arivanov · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That _WAS_ the case.

      It took a couple of millions to start a let's say router company 10 years ago. Now you need 100M to just consider it.

      It took a couple of millions to start a network management company 10 years ago. Now you need 30-50M.

      It took a couple of millions to start an ISP 10 years ago. Now you need something on the order of a few 100M.

      The "several guys in the garage making the next big thing" is the norm in any market in the beginning. HP was started in a garage. Apple was started in a garage. You cannot however start a computer company in a garage today. The Internet is quickly approaching that stage. The number of areas where there are still breakthroughs of garage companies is small and decreasing and this is normal for the development of the market.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  2. How hard? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How hard would it be to go a week without Google? Or, to up the ante, without Facebook, Amazon, Skype, Twitter, Apple, eBay and Google?

    Pretty fucking easy, actually. My God what are we becoming when people think this shit is so important?

    Back in my day (well, ok, my grandfather's) we worried about important shit like steel, or oil. Hell, even telephone wire - it's physical, someone owns it, and they control it completely. Those are monopolies - you're strangled by one provider.

    Facebook? Apple? Amazon? Give me a fucking break. Oh noesies, I can't go read about something cute one of some guy I barely know's brat kids did! Oh no, I have to buy a less expensive version that functions just as well of some gadget I don't need! Uh oh, I have to walk my fat ass to Target or order from one of the other billion internet stores!

    Author makes common mistake of confusing a monopoly with most successful provider of something that one could, if one wanted, get from 20 other places.

  3. 'Free market' means muddled thinking by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The term "free market" is used to mean "competitive market" and is also used to mean "un-regulated market", despite the fact that few markets are both competitive and un-regulated. When someone uses the term "free market" with out clarifying which they mean, they are either confused, or they are trying to confuse you.