Slashdot Mirror


National Opt-Out Day Against Virtual Strip Searches

An anonymous reader writes in about a protest called for the busiest airline travel day of the year. "An activist opposed to the new invasive body scanners in use at airports around the country just designated Wednesday, Nov. 24 as a National Opt-Out Day. He's encouraging airline passengers to decline the TSA's technological strip searches en masse on that day as a protest against the scanners, as well as the new 'enhanced pat-downs' inflicted on refuseniks. 'The goal of National Opt-Out Day is to send a message to our lawmakers that we demand change,' reads the call to action at OptOutDay.com, set up by Brian Sodegren. 'No naked body scanners, no government-approved groping. We have a right to privacy, and buying a plane ticket should not mean that we're guilty until proven innocent.' The US Airline Pilots Association and other pilot groups have urged their members to avoid the scanners and have also condemned the new pat-down policy as humiliating to pilots. They've advised pilots who don't feel comfortable undergoing pat-downs in front of passengers to request they be conducted in a private room. Any pilots who don't feel comfortable after undergoing a pat-down have been encouraged to 'call in sick and remove themselves from the trip.'"

9 of 647 comments (clear)

  1. The privacy/security scale tips again. by windcask · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I wonder how well this would've gone over in October 2001. We haven't had a genuine terror attack in a long time, so people start getting indignant about security again. Do we really need to have another international calamity for us to start respecting laws that were put in place to keep us safe?

    1. Re:The privacy/security scale tips again. by windcask · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Not quite as much money as in liberal cynicism.

    2. Re:The privacy/security scale tips again. by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Some guy putting his hands on my dick is not making us safer.

      You mite enjoy that kind of violation by some random can't get a job at the home depot guy. The rest of use what to choose who does the dick touching.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    3. Re:The privacy/security scale tips again. by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Our support for Israel has generated lots of resentment in the Muslim world.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    4. Re:The privacy/security scale tips again. by hedwards · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's not bullshit. The Israeli government is currently committing several war crimes. For instance they've been pillaging Palestinian lands for resources and building in areas owned by the Palestinian authority.

      Israel would have more standing to complain about the terrorism if they weren't themselves engaged in crimes against humanity.

  2. Re:A non-partisan no-brainer by MightyYar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Everyone can (and should) agree that this is a gross violation of privacy and should not be tolerated.

    It's only a "gross violation" if you are forced to do it. There is an opt-out.

    Maybe I'm just shamelessly immodest, but I support these scanners if they can be shown to speed up the process of checking in. People need to get over being seen naked - do they avoid the doctor's office as well?

    "Virtually groped?" That's insane. Have a separate line for the insane people. That covers the "expanding the power of the state" crew, too.

    We live in a world where airplanes attract way more than their fair share of terrorism - we need to accept that fact. We can't pretend that people won't try to bomb airplanes, even if there are much easier ways to kill people. Terrorists don't go after low-hanging fruit... they go after the spectacular. Otherwise they'd be bombing suburban bus and train routes, malls, and other places which are almost impossible to police. A plane is an exceptionally hard target in comparison, and yet they persist.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  3. Re:A non-partisan no-brainer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    >People need to get over being seen naked

    Why don't you get over yourself first, you stupid faggot.

  4. Re:Be safer than sorry when it comes to cancer by russotto · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Agree with all of that. But the point of civil disobedience is not to make life immediately more comfortable for yourself.

    Civil disobedience (in the modern sense) is worthless; they have enough jails for everyone, and the media won't make a sensation out of you the way they did about Rosa Parks.

  5. Re:A non-partisan no-brainer by toriver · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So you were lap-dog to the insurance industry lobby's lap-dog. Meanwhile, universal health care is working fine in Europe and Canada.