Slashdot Mirror


WSJ Warnings About Cookies Carry Cookies

itwbennett writes "The Wall Street Journal has 'a pretty useful section tracking privacy issues, privacy protection tools and the threats thereof from online marketers, from the point of view and on the technical level of a relatively savvy consumer,' says blogger Kevin Fogarty. The downside: He discovered that reading two stories from the WSJ's privacy section left behind deletion-resistant Flash cookies."

4 of 45 comments (clear)

  1. Trojan? by DamonHD · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does that count as a Trojan article?

    Rgds

    Damon

    --
    http://m.earth.org.uk/
  2. Cookies in the Cookie article? by smitty777 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a good thing it wasn't an article on syphylis

    --
    "Before God we are all equally wise - and equally foolish"
    Albert Einstein
  3. Let's all just acknowledge this for a moment by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Threats of online marketers."

    Online marketing is a threat. We all need to acknowledge this and accept it. It is a threat to our privacy and to ourselves if and when that information is sold (because there are few if any laws against it) for purposes other than marketing. The problem starts with aggressive marketing. It needs to stop. They will not willingly respect us. They have to be forced to do so. They will not change their ways out of guilt or shame -- they have none. Let it settle into your brain and then act accordingly.

  4. Re:Cookies carrying cookies?! by ZeRu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This site stores your viewing preferences in cookies. It is possible to opt out of this in your settings. However, that information will be stored in a cookie.
    Do you still wish to opt out?

    --
    If you post as an AC, don't expect me to spend a mod point on you.