Slashdot Mirror


The Story of My As-Yet-Unverified Impact Crater

tetrahedrassface writes "When I was very young, my dad took me on a trip to his parents' farm. He wanted to show me 'The Crater.' We walked a long way through second generation hardwoods and finally stood on the rim of a hole that has no equal in this area. As I grew up, I became more interested in The Crater, and would always tell friends about it. It is roughly 1,200 feet across and 120 feet deep, and has a strange vibe about it. When you walk up to it, you feel like something really big happened here. Either the mother of all caves is down there, or a large object smashed into this place a long, long time ago. I bought aerial photos when I was twelve and later sent images from GIS to a geologist at a local university. He pretty much laughed me out of his office, saying that it was a sinkhole. He did wish me luck, however. It may be sinkhole. Who knows? Last week I borrowed a metal detector and went poking around, and have found the strangest shrapnel pieces I have ever seen. They are composed of a metal that reacts strongly to acids. The largest piece so far reacted with tap water and dish-washing detergent. My second trip today yielded lots of strange new pieces of metal, and hopefully, one day the truth will be known. Backyard science is so much fun. And who knows; if it is indeed a cave, maybe Cerberus resides there."

53 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. Your backyard.. by eexaa · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm kindof afraid that your backyard is going to become the first physical place to be slashdotted.

    1. Re:Your backyard.. by naz404 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have you noticed any strange abilities, powers or personality changes emerging after exposure to these strange pieces of metal for extended periods of time?

      Hmmm... you may also want to consider forging a magical sword out these strange metal fragments... You can then challenge the meteor sword-wielding Sir Terry Pratchett to an internet duel of epic proportions...

    2. Re:Your backyard.. by penguin_dance · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It would have been nice if he would give some idea of location. Is this in the US, Europe, etc.? Someone here might know the local geography. The bits of metal don't look all that weird to me. It could be there because of a battle, a deposit of iron ore or other natural deposit. Are there any old mines in the area?

      And do you have any food synthesizers that went down?

      Yeah, I'm wondering if we're being punked with a video game promotion....

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
  2. Hmm by RenHoek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does this remind so much of The Story of Barbie Head Archeology...

    1. Re:Hmm by eexaa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No idea, but on the second thought this totally reminds me one long-inactive volcano we got here in CZ. Google for 'Komorni hurka' or 'Kammerbühl'.

      Images from the actual volcano crater:

      http://kurz.geologie.sci.muni.cz/obrazky_ucebnice/obrazek4_23.jpg
      http://regiony.ic.cz/clanky/karlov/hurka_v.jpg

  3. Looks like a karst depression by damas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Could be a karst landform http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karst_topography. Carbonate rock will react with water.

    1. Re:Looks like a karst depression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Carbonate rock will react with water.

      When you say "react with", you mean "dissolve, usually quite slowly, in".

      Sorry, that is not what he means. Most carbonates will react (not dissolve) with chlorinated tap water and acidic ground water.

  4. never heard of metorites reacting with water by scapermoya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    my guess is that you have something along the lines of calcium carbide in those rocks

    --
    Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun the frumious Bandersnatch.
    1. Re:never heard of metorites reacting with water by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      If they did, he would not be here to post about it.... There are only 6 metals that will react with water, and they are the Alkali metals, and they are quite energetic (as in Jamie Wants Big Boom).

      Looking at the pictures, the depressions to the north, the cutouts running north and south.. I would have to agree with the expert he consulted that what they have there are sink holes.

      The metals could have even been dumped there, not as in a hoax, years and years ago as the site could have been a "garbage dump". Unless you know the history of the area, may never know for sure.

    2. Re:never heard of metorites reacting with water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they did, he would not be here to post about it.... There are only 6 metals that will react with water, and they are the Alkali metals, and they are quite energetic (as in Jamie Wants Big Boom).

      Not so, the alkali earth metals (calcium, for example) will also react with water on a clean surface, but much less violently. Calcium still evolves gas at a visible rate...

    3. Re:never heard of metorites reacting with water by speroni · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Does it not rain there?

      Surely if the metals reacted to water they would have had the chance by now.

      --
      Eschew Obfuscation
    4. Re:never heard of metorites reacting with water by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If he was holding it in a frangible container 6 inches from his face with no protection while submersing it in water, then yes...he could get injured by an Alkali metal. They actually react quite slow in comparison to many other explosives, and have a very limited amount of power. In fact, several grams of Sodium wasn't even enough to break a soda bottle for me. It just filled with some nasty smoke/gas and distended the bottle.

      Also, take into account that if he just found them lying there, there is almost zero chance they are alkali metals. They would long ago have disappeared thanks to rain and atmospheric humidity. A simple carbonate is the most likely answer.

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
  5. Take it to a uni by Old+Wolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about taking a bit down to the geology department at the local university? Find out what the crater actually is. It could be important :)

    1. Re:Take it to a uni by Kreychek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But if an expert told him, it wouldn't be unverified... or a crater, and thus not newsworthy.

    2. Re:Take it to a uni by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

      They'll just say it's a sinkhole or something, then insist that Global Warming is real and then pretend The Earth is really much older than the 6000 years old we all know it to be and that we all evolved from monkeys and that The Earth really goes around the sun, and that pi is bigger than 3. I wouldn't believe a scientist!

      (Sorry. Am I being too mean here?)

    3. Re:Take it to a uni by ComaVN · · Score: 4, Funny

      (Sorry. Am I being too mean here?)

      Only if the strawman is sentient.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    4. Re:Take it to a uni by Skrapion · · Score: 5, Funny

      My father was a strawman, you insensitive clod!

      --
      The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
    5. Re:Take it to a uni by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      A Justin Wilson joke:

      A Cajun sends his son off to college. When the kid comes home for Spring break, the Cajun asks his son "so, whad'ya larn, boy?"

      The son thinks a minute and says "Pi R square."

      The old man is indignant. "What kind o' tomfoolery is they teachin' you, boy? Pie are round, cornbread are square!"

    6. Re:Take it to a uni by penguinchris · · Score: 2, Funny

      I read this thread with an incredulous look on my face - did the summary change, or did *all these people* really not even read the summary? :)

  6. skeptics... unite! by igotmybfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    are you (my fellow /.ers) sure this isn't a stalking horse for some kind of viral advertisement / alternate reality game?

  7. Sinkhole sounds plausible; impact crater not. by wvmarle · · Score: 3, Informative

    Looking at that photo, sinkhole sounds plausible.

    Maybe there are more holes in the surroundings, then it's clear. Also don't craters normally come with an elevated rim? Hard to see from above of course but no indication of such a rim around it.

    Oh well lots of guesses will be posted here I'm sure. It's /. after all, fantasies running wild.

    Indeed just take those metals to your local uni or so, have them figure out what it is. If they really react strongly to water then this must be recently exposed material (won't last long outdoors in the wet soil), so can't be from an ancient impact crater. I mean the material itself could be from whatever source but it's obviously exposed recently as you can find it easily with a metal detector so can't be there for a very long time or it would have weathered already.

    Also impact craters usually have lots of glassy material from molten rock present, look up some research articles about confirmed craters on what you should be able to find there.

    1. Re:Sinkhole sounds plausible; impact crater not. by n9hmg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes. It looks like a sinkhole. One google earth picture doesn't tell much. The fact is it COULD be something else, within the confines of the information presented. If the geologist "laughed you out of his office" on just that image, he's a fool...unless you talked about spaceships, aliens, etc., in which case it's difficult to afford you even polite dismissal. It probably is a sinkhole, and doesn't require the "mother of all caves" to do it. Could be a deposit of soft rock gouged away by a glacier. Could be a very old impact crater torn up by glaciers. Probably a sinkhole, though.
      "new-metal" looks like a blob of zinc. Perhaps an outbuilding was in that location and burnt down? I've seen a lot of zinc-head nails, and a haymow burning would melt all the zinc on top of a corrugated roof sending it down in rivulets to solidify on the ground.
      It's really hard to take you seriously when you talk about the "vibe" of the place. That says you've already decided to believe things not in evidence. That greatly reduces your usefulness as a source of information.

  8. You know why? by IICV · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He pretty much laughed me out of his office, saying that it was a sinkhole. He did wish me luck, however. It may be sinkhole.

    You know why he laughed you out of his office? Because you went in there saying "Look! I've got an as-yet undiscovered crater in my backyard! Or maybe it's a big cave or something!"

    It makes you sound like some easily-impressed idiot who doesn't know the first thing about rocks, which is probably what you are - something that irregular and in soil that looks that soft is almost certainly not a crater. I mean, just compare it to a picture of an actual crater; they're nothing alike.

    And then you go off about "oooh when I put water on these rocks they bubble!", like you've never heard of limestone (and it sounds like you probably haven't), and "I found weird lumps of metal!" like you've never heard of (oh I don't know) humans leaving shit around.

    Seriously, you sound like the worst sort of credulous idiot. There's a reason why they say "ten hours in the lab will save you an hour in the library" - do some reading up on even the most basic geology first (and I mean fucking basic, not the awesome stuff like impact craters or mega sinkholes or what have you), then start telling people about how awesome it is. I'm sure that formation is, actually, very interesting - you don't get areas with (apparently) a lot of water and a lot of limestone without at least some neat stuff happening - but you don't need to start by making shit up!

    1. Re:You know why? by Ziekheid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You might be right at most of your points but there is no need to talk an enthusiastic person down like that. I for one am glad that people who haven't even studied this matter take interest in their local area and try to find out what it actually is.
      I agree though that you should always go for the most logical assumption first.

    2. Re:You know why? by IICV · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You might be right at most of your points but there is no need to talk an enthusiastic person down like that. I for one am glad that people who haven't even studied this matter take interest in their local area and try to find out what it actually is.

      But that's the thing! He's not taking an interest! He's literally in the process of making up an urban legend.

      I mean the parts are all there - "I've known about a place where weird stuff happens since I was a kid. I went to a well-established authority figure and he laughed me out of his office! Then I went back to the place where weird things happen and I found all sorts of strange artifacts! Oh my gosh! Tickets are $5 a person."

      Seriously, give this guy another couple of years and he'll have found ancient Mayan ruins (nevermind the fact that the Mayans never came up here) complete with alien doohickies.

      It's like this: taking an interest is looking at what's actually there. This guy is clearly only looking at what he wants to see. The overblown, sensationalist Slashdot summary is just a symptom of underlying delusions of mystery, and honestly fits perfectly with the generic urban legend narrative.

      In fact, I bet you anything the geologist did absolutely nothing even remotely like laughing the poster out of his office - the poster e-mailed the geologist some pictures; physically being inside someone's office is a prerequisite for being laughed out of it, and honestly it doesn't work that at all if you interpret the sentence as a metaphor (I mean how do you know the geologist was laughing at you in an e-mail? Is it perhaps because at some level you know that your claims are, in and of themselves, laughable?). However, that phrase fit the story so perfectly we're expected to overlook this detail.

    3. Re:You know why? by vegiVamp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > there is no need to talk an enthusiastic person down like that

      Wish I could pass some of my users on to you. They're really enthusiastic about things, I can tell you. Almost enough to make up for their utter lack of understanding or their complete inability to understand even basic concepts.

      Sometimes a good mental kicking is the best you can do for them, not to mention yourself.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    4. Re:You know why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      (Apparently) unlike you, the submitter acknowledges the possibility of being wrong, and still has a childlike fascination for the things we all know too much about to be inspired by. Also, we have yet to know what was meant by "mailed" and whether or not a subsequent office visit took place. Your post seems to reveal more about your own assumptions than the submitter's.

    5. Re:You know why? by nschubach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's been my experience that science is pretty sucky. If we called the news media every time we found a chunk of metal and predetermined it to be alien artifacts, we'd all be Scientologists.

      It has nothing to do with being "close minded" as much as it has to be about finding the truth before making up what you want it to be.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    6. Re:You know why? by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      . the submitter acknowledges the possibility of being wrong, and still has a childlike fascination for the things we all know too much about to be inspired by. ...

      Yeah. And I wonder about the vociferous put-downs that people are posting. After all, there are hundreds of known impact craters scattered around the planet. The US has had several cases of meteors hitting houses in the past few decades (two of them in Connecticut). Some years back, there was a groups of small craters (in the 1-2m size range) in a farming area in China, probably caused by the pieces of a larger rock that broke up in the atmosphere. Just a year or two ago, there was the impact in eastern Africa that was located from calculations based on several photos of the object in the atmosphere.

      It's estimate that 1-3m diameter meteors enter the atmosphere at a rate of around 1 per day. Most break up in the air and become a dust fall, but a few hit the ground.

      In general, a meteor impact is a reasonably hypothesis if you even have a roughly circular crater, which the aerial photo does have. Granted, it's only roughly circular, but it does have a hill in the center. So an old, weathered crater is a reasonable thing to consider. Or a karst sink, if the area has a lot of calcium rocks.

      OTOH, it's not too surprising if "the authorities" don't find it interesting. They probably know of lots of sinkholes and craters in their general vicinity. A new one might not strike them as very interesting, unless there's something really unusual about it.

      The best suggestion might be that the fellow get together a few interested friends, read up a bit on amateur archaeological and paleontological digging, and set to work in the depression. If there are any experts on such digging at nearby schools (or mining companies ;-), ask them for advice. With a bit of careful digging, they may add a bit to our knowledge of local history. The metals may just be from mining, or the rubble from a recent battlegound or campground or whatever. But even that could add to the store of local historical knowledge.

      Instead of trying to discourage them, maybe we could encourage a bit of digging and analysis.

      And maybe they will turn up evidence of the first real crash site of an alien spacecraft. ;-)

       

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  9. Cut it! by dvh.tosomja · · Score: 5, Informative

    Cut the stone with angle grinder, polish the cut, show us the picture. Meteorites have quite distinctive texture.

    1. Re:Cut it! by dkf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Cut the stone with angle grinder, polish the cut, show us the picture. Meteorites have quite distinctive texture.

      Also try getting some shavings from the inside of the lump and heating them strongly in a flame (a small blowtorch is ideal for this). The color of flame created will indicate what metals/metal ions are involved (OK, cruder than using a spectroscope, but easy to do with stuff that many people have lying around).

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    2. Re:Cut it! by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If it's metal, and it reacts with water, this more than likely isn't the best advice to give.

      As someone posted earlier, "Jamie Want Big Boom."

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:Cut it! by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe he should cut it with a cut-off wheel instead of a grinding wheel, unless his goal is to produce sand.
      Personally I use a miter saw with a grinding wheel to cut stuff that isn't wood, so I don't have to hold anything steady.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. Carbonates by RWarrior(fobw) · · Score: 5, Informative

    [My apologies for the lack of links: Google is your friend. The editor is being a bitch.]

    If it reacts with acid, it's carbonate (such as calcium carbonate, CaCO2). The classic test for carbonates is to dump a 5% solution of HCl (hydrochloric acid, available as muriatic acid in any hardware store) onto the sample; if it bubbles, it's a carbonate. (I know one geologist who calls this test "barbaric.") You can also use common household vinegar.

    99.99% of all carbonates on the Earth are sedimentary. Usually, they form in shallow to medium depth water when microscopic critters with calcium shells die by the kazillions and fall to the ocean floor, where they pile into layers that give us things like limestone. There is one exception, however: Oldoinyo Lengai is a volcano in Tanzania that produces carbonate lava (the only carbonate-producing volcano in the world -- all the rest produce silicates, products based on SiO2). Someday I would like to see a sample of this igneous carbonate, because while silicates are really really important in geology, they're also really really common, and thus really really boring.

    A relatively inexpensive bulk chemical analysis could tell you the exact composition of your samples, and you would probably find a pretty high iron content, which accounts for the trigger on your metal detector. My educated guess is the mineral siderite, FeCO3. It is common both in hydrothermal veins and in sedimentary formations.

    Sinkholes can form when subterrainian water flows dissolve minerals (such as carbonates), forming a cave that later collapses. When this happens, you get a crater. And yes, you can get a pretty big one, depending on how deep the cave is.

    So yes, it's a probably a sinkhole.

    --
    Remove the caps and hold to a mirror.
    1. Re:Carbonates by qvatch · · Score: 2, Informative

      The carbonate igneous mineral is a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonatite . We get them up in ontario in and around Bancroft.

  11. Sinkhole by Pentagram · · Score: 3, Informative

    Speaking as a caver, it could well be a shakehole (sinkhole). It's not the classic shape for it but they vary in shape and size. It's big, but not enormous. If it is a shakehole it certainly won't have broken any records.

    As a first step, check some geological maps. If you're above limestone, I'd say: case closed, it's a shakehole. Yes, it's above a cave (or at least where a cave used to be!) The first photo of the "new metal" looks suspiciously like limestone.

  12. Have studied Geomorphology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Finding out a origin of such negative relief forms is a hard task.
    1) Get a fine scale topographical map of it's surroundings. 1:10'000 is excellent, 1:25'000 could also work (depends on crater size). Look for any similar features around. Could this be a simple erosional form?

    2) Go to nearest geological survey department and ask for surface geological map. Depending on Your location, it might be called "Quaternary sediment cover map". I'm not from USofA and thus have no idea if You will need to $$ to get it. If they offer also an geomorphological map, take that also. Those maps will help You to understand locations geological setting. You will be able to check possibility of ordinary karst or termokarst.

    3) Compare craters location with known extent of Quaternary glaciations. In territories with Quaternary glaciations or close to glacial limits is possible to see termokarst depressions. They can be of variable size and form - starting from small, round crater-like forms up to large wally-like depressions filled with modern lakes.

    4) If You want to describe any rock sample, You need to get a clean, fresh surface. Identifying rock samples by simply pouring an acid on it's surface might just reveal presence of calcite in soil and say nothing about rock it self.

    5) Double check exact location in relief where You found those sock samples. Could there been some springs coming out or have been groundwater discharge location? Then it might be Limonite (bog ore) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limonite

    6) If it's still not clear what it is - get an hand auger (soil sampler). I use One-Piece Edelman Auger. Make a profile line over that "crater" - sample on undisturbed land, on the rim, at the bottom etc. Get coordinates for exact location; photographs; describe color, wetness, anything You see or feel with hands (pebbles, sand, dust). Making correct description sill might need an training to get familiar with methods, still You will be able to tell if there's difference in soil composition on rims/bottom in comparison with surrounding territory (if crater is young enough).

    Sorry form my language.

    1. Re:Have studied Geomorphology by JustABlitheringIdiot · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not from USofA and thus have no idea if You will need to $$ to get it.

      You don't always need to pay for a topo map. They can be found online here for free. I use these at work all the time and they are decent if not really out of date sometimes. All you need is the coordinates (can be had from google earth or maps).

      Also I agree with previous poster RWarrior(fobw) it is probably a ferrous carbonate such as siderite or something similar and you have most likely found a sinkhole. Now if they are uncommon in your area you may have something special there.

    2. Re:Have studied Geomorphology by Zcar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most US Geological Survey 7.5 minute quads are available for download in PDF from: US Topo

      With the size the OP mentions, it should show fairly well; these are 10 foot/3 meter contours and a 1200 foot "crater" should be about 0.6"/1.5 cm. Not all states are covered, yet, but there are other free USGS sources to download these.

    3. Re:Have studied Geomorphology by ShaunC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Absolutely do not apologize for your language. Your English is better than many native English speakers'.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    4. Re:Have studied Geomorphology by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

      He wasn't apologizing for his language; only lamenting its shape!

  13. Seems geologist was politer than IICV by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why are you using abusive language to a complete stranger, just because he doesn't know as much geology and chemistry as you do? Perhaps you should think about attending a course on anger management.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Seems geologist was politer than IICV by IICV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh you're looking for gentle encouragement? I'm so sorry, this is Slashdot - we only offer abuse and Soviet Russia jokes. Oh and sharks with lasers on their heads. Okay, we offer three things...

      As I said to a sibling poster: if this dude was actually looking to understand what is going on, he wouldn't be making up stories like this - he would be actually researching the area. Instead, he takes pictures of lumps of rock and names the image file "meteor"; he's clearly far more interested in telling a made-up story about the place than in actually doing the research and finding out what's happening there. I mean, really, more power to you if you want to do that - but don't demand that everyone else respect you for your made up bullshit, and refrain from pointing out how you're being dumb.

  14. Meteorwrongs by jolyonr · · Score: 4, Informative

    We get these sorts of questions regularly on my site (www.mindat.org) and, I have to say, the vast majority of times they turn out to be of entirely terrestrial origin (meteorwrongs).
    A friend at the Natural History Museum in London tells me that well over 99.9% of the items brought in as possible meteorites turn out not to be. The chances are not good.

    Now, I would not want to dismiss your findings out of hand because, of course, meteorites can be found anywhere. But the first picture doesn't look like a meteorite to me at all. It looks like a very badly corroded iron pyrite nodule, which are relatively common in some limestones and other sedimentary rocks. The second one could be a meteorite, but it could equally well be a nodule.

    Easy way to tell is break one open. If it has a radial crystalline structure then it cannot be a meteorite, it can only be an iron sulphide nodule.

    Alternatively, post pictures and descriptions on my board where real geologists and mineralogists can help you!

    Jolyon

    ps. Calcium Carbide? I had to laugh!

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
  15. Maybe yes, maybe no, hard to say from here... by rgbatduke · · Score: 4, Informative

    It could easily be a meteor crater or a sinkhole, or even an old quarry (depending on the quality of the rock). If it is a meteor crater that size, you really have hit the jackpot, because meteors are worth money. However, the people who buy them aren't idiots, so you won't make money pretending; you have to find out. If it was formed by a meteor, there would have been splatter in all directions, but more in one direction than the others. Get a metal detector and search not just inside but all around the periphery up to three or four hundred meters away. If it really is from a meteor, and nobody has "mined" out the many fragments it would have produced, and it was the right kind of meteor (many are nickel-iron, some are stony, nickel-iron are the ones you can find and identify with a metal detector) you will find some chunks that aren't just teensy bits, but are large, partially fused, chunks of mixed iron and rock. They are hard to miss -- their density is close to twice that of ordinary rock (specific gravity closer to five than three). As another poster pointed out, even stony meteors can usually be identified by sawing and polishing -- the origins of meteor rock are typically quite different from earthbound rocks and they have a characteristic structure. But limestone chunks are probably not going to be meteors...;-)

    Anyway, if you have a real crater with lots of real meteorite fragments, bear in mind that they will sell for hundreds to thousands of dollars each, depending on size, composition, and provenance. Even tens of thousands for large bits. And yes, there are geology departments at Universities that would like very much to help you search for pieces and study the crater itself, and you should give them first dibs before making money out of it as knowledge is more important than money.

    Good luck, but don't hold your breath. No matter where you are sitting, you are sitting on top of at least meteor dust as a contant rain of that drifts down from the sky every day, and fragments from tiny to small are rather commonplace. Larger fragments are increasingly rare, though, and really big impact craters (that have been identified as such) are very rare.

    rgb

    --
    Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
    1. Re:Maybe yes, maybe no, hard to say from here... by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > It could easily be a meteor crater or a sinkhole, or even an old quarry

      Given that the posted feature has a second landform that appears largely identical just to the upper left, I'm going with quarry.

  16. Acids vs. bases by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 2, Informative

    > They are composed of a metal that reacts strongly to acids.
    >The largest piece so far reacted with tap water and
    > dish-washing detergent

    Dish washing detergent is basic, not acidic.

    http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090106114510AAlzSKE

    It is highly unlikely you have a single material that reacts _chemically_ the same way to both.

  17. Re:It looks like an impage crater... of sorts by mangu · · Score: 3, Informative

    An impact crater look very differently from what happens when you toss a coin. Hint: there's a *BIG* explosion when the kinetic energy is suddenly transformed into heat.

    No matter how shallow is the angle, impact craters are always nearly circular and symmetric. The material is suddenly compressed with a huge amount of energy and heats up to thousands of degrees. The resulting explosion propagates to all directions, independent of which direction the meteor came from.

  18. I can help you with determination by sebaseba · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm an undergrad student of Chemistry and I live in a karstic region, so I might help you a bit. First it would be cool if you would measure the density of the potential meteorite (displacement of water + mass, measure first mass) and also it would be nice if we could determine for example the amount of iron in it This can be done with common household chemicals (HCl, NaOH both common available accross the globe). Iron is not so rare in such karstic landscapes (if that crater is in one), but afaik is usually not in an elemental form. You used a metal detector so you've probably found a metallic element. That's also judging from a second photo from comments, where we can see the shiny metallic lustter. Also you could maybe give me your email or something ;)

  19. Jesus. by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 4, Informative
    First of I have a degree in Environmental Science. Second, I know the history of this place for the last hundred years. Third it sets of a metal detector. Fourth the largest sample off gassed when I brought it in and washed it with water and dawn dishwashing detergent. That is all I know. I am not, nor do I wish to be making up urban legends. It may well be a sinkhole as I noted in the submission. I didn't expect this to be published on the front page, but you know what? It *is* kinda cool, and for all the name calling by a few of you who feign anger at someone like myself who actually goes out and pokes around rather then sitting in an armchair it doesn't bother me.

    This is not in Florida... And no, I won't post lat and longitude because I can see that a lot of people would probably swarm out here. I will continue detecting around the area, looking for more pieces of metal, and maybe even, god forbid go down in the bottom and dig.

    For all the constructive posts, thanks. If it is a cave, I want to go in it!

    1. Re:Jesus. by Kentari · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know where you got the idea that there haven't been meteorites (meteor remains) found at Meteor Crater. There have been, thousands of fragments, totalling over 30 tons, collected from the region, including a 600kg specimen.

  20. Radiation? by RKBA · · Score: 2, Funny

    I suggest you take a Geiger counter with you on your next trip to the crater before you go mucking about too much there.

  21. A little harsh maybe. by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The thing is that on Slashdot no one knows how old you are.
    If this poster is 14 or 15 he may be on the start of becoming a very good geologist.
    Even 18 he still is just really enthusiastic.
    I agree this is probably a sink hole of some kind and not an impact. But that is only a guess I have only a passing knowledge of geology but none of the rocks shown seem all that odd to me.
    You never educate through ridicule and for all you know you just made some 16 year old girl just getting into science cry.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.