Slashdot Mirror


Internet Blacklist Back In Congress

Adrian Lopez writes "A bill giving the government the power to shut down Web sites that host materials that infringe copyright is making its way quietly through the lame-duck session of Congress, raising the ire of free-speech groups and prompting a group of academics to lobby against the effort. The Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) was introduced in Congress this fall by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT). It would grant the federal government the power to block access to any Web domain that is found to host copyrighted material without permission."

7 of 278 comments (clear)

  1. Obama will not veto this. by MindlessAutomata · · Score: -1, Troll

    Fucking Repugs... oh, wait, that's a D.

    Obama isn't going to veto this if it passes. Just so you know.

    1. Re:Obama will not veto this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      And yet not a single one of the Republicans in the Senate will probably vote against it either despite the fact that they could block this from ever passing.

    2. Re:Obama will not veto this. by spun · · Score: -1, Troll

      His what, now? You actually believe Rand Paul has ideals? He has demonstrated, over and over, that he does not. He doesn't even have convictions, let alone ideals. He is a spoiled brat whose political philosophy boils down to "You aren't the boss of me, I'll do whatever I want to, whenever I want to and you can't stop me." Rand Paul pretends to be a board certified ophthalmologist by pretending to be a board of ophthalmological certification who only certifies Rand Paul. Then there is his Aqua Buddha incident where he kidnapped a female college acquaintance and tried to make her smoke pot. Rand Paul respects only one person's rights: Rand Paul's. Everyone else can go hang. Whenever Republicans or Corporations have asked Rand Paul to change his position, his answer has been "To what?"

      Rand Paul could not remember why Harlan, Kentucky was famous, but thought it might have something to do with the Dukes of Hazard. Rand Paul threatened to sue the reporter who broke the Aqua Buddha drug fueled idol worshiping kidnapping, even though Paul would not deny the truth of the story. He refused to reveal how old he thinks the earth is, as he is "not running for minister."

      In short, Rand Paul is a living, breathing monument to the absolute, unmitigated selfishness that is American Libertarianism. He shows, in innumerable ways, time and again, that his 'ideals' are simply, "Rand Paul gets to do whatever he likes. Rules are made by fascists and do not apply to Rand Paul. Unless they are protecting or enriching Rand Paul, in which case, they do apply."

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:Obama will not veto this. by Dishevel · · Score: 0, Troll
      Hope has always been negative. People are just for the most part to stupid to realize it.

      Hope is for losers that gave up. I fucking PLAN!

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  2. In the land of the free by unity100 · · Score: 1, Troll

    the freemen with the most money make the rules. yet, there are still a lot of ayn randists who would still attempt selling free market/capitalist bullshit to us :

    money is power. if you allow any individual or group to gain more money than others, you practically give the power in their hands. no amount of 'equality' legislation in the political arena, can offset this economic power; the one with the gold makes the rule.

  3. A race to the bottom against Islamic states by mykos · · Score: 0, Troll

    Islamic morality says that porn is evil.

    American morality says that sharing the ideas of others is evil.

  4. Re:bullshit by unity100 · · Score: 1, Troll

    limited government is as 'none' as no government. in a limited government, private corporations would fulfill the rendering of critical goods and services, giving the power over these critical facets of life into their hands. this is what private interests exactly want, since it is the closest situation to feudalism.

    they will make the people, public spend funds for military, police, enforcement, saving them headaches of paying for them, also averting the risk of rebellions and revolutions, and still govern all aspects of life outside these with their financial dominance. actually, they already do that.