Slashdot Mirror


US May Disable All Car Phones, Says Trans. Secretary

gambit3 writes "The US government may require cars to include scrambling tech that would disable mobile-phone use by drivers, and perhaps passengers. 'I think it will be done,' US Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood said on Wednesday morning. 'I think the technology is there and I think you're going to see the technology become adaptable in automobiles to disable these cell phones.' LaHood is on a self-described 'rampage' against distracted driving, and if making it impossible to use a mobile phone while in a car can save lives, he's all for it."

5 of 1,065 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Go for it by maiden_taiwan · · Score: 3, Informative

    The data show that your risk of an accident increases while 4x when you're on the phone.

    http://www.psych.utah.edu/lab/appliedcognition/

    This has nothing to do with "misuse." It's a human limitation.

  2. Re:Fucking nanny-state moron. by MarkGriz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Settle down all you knee-jerkers, that's not actually what he said

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  3. Re:Go for it by maiden_taiwan · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's a fine opinion, but look at the research. The data don't agree with you. Driving while talking on a cell phone turns out worse than all the things you mention, when actually measured. There seems to be something special about the way the brain handles a phone conversation that impairs the ability to multitask more severely.

    Don't take my word for it. Read the research.

  4. Re:So, what if I have a car with bluetooth receive by D+Ninja · · Score: 3, Informative

    I will be no more distracted than any other driver who is talking to his passengers.

    Actually, this is not true.

    The problem with talking and driving is NOT the hands free aspect. The real problem is with the way the human mind works. When you are talking to someone who is physically in your car, your brain does not need to do work to "see" that person. You don't have to imagine what they are doing or how they are looking because they are sitting right next to you. This is true EVEN IF YOU NEVER LOOK AT THEM. When you are on a call phone, part of your brain responsible for visual aspects (AKA looking at the road) is now occupied. That's why you get the "blind driver effect" in which people who have been talking on their phones don't remember driving from point A to point B (or they blackout on parts). So, bluetooth does not do anything to help you overcome this problem.

    The other aspect of talking on a cell phone is that the other person can't see what is going on around you. If someone is in a car with you, they can see that traffic has come to a screeching halt, or that someone has cut you off, or whatever the case may be and they can appropriately shut up or say something - fully understanding that you need to focus. The same doesn't happen on the cell phone.

    Now, don't get me wrong - I want the government to be hands off. I especially dislike it when they try to solve problems with technology that are better solved through other means. And, other /. posts have pointed out the various areas where there could be problems with having this type of system in place. But, it is very far from the truth to say that bluetooth is a "better alternative."

    As others have pointed out, the real solution is using common sense and actually following it.

  5. Re:Go for it by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Informative

    GPS devices don't measure acceleration. They measure approximate location. It's not hard to get a reflected signal and have a GPS device jump around. Especially if you're using ghetto-GPS (cell tower triangulation).