China Demonstrates 25+ Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
overThruster writes "The Wall Street Journal and Defense News report that China had more than 25 different unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) on display at the Zhuhai Airshow. In addition to a jet powered UAV that is potentially faster than US made drones such as the Predator and Reaper, the Chinese have developed an unmanned 'thopter' for surveillance. 'ASN showed off 10 different UAVs, including the new ASN-211 Flapping Wing Aircraft System, which simulates a bird in flight. The prototype on display has a take-off weight of only 220 grams with a maximum speed of six-to-10 meters a second and an altitude ranging from 20-200 meters. A spokesperson said the micro-UAV would mainly be used for low-altitude reconnaissance for troops in the field.'"
Gives new meaning to the phrase, "Chinese take-out"
What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
Sure ornithopters are great, but what I really want is a personal submarine that looks like a shark, or perhaps a subway train that drills its own tunnels, like a worm.
It's not technically stolen. We started by sending our manufacturing plants to China, higher Technical jobs, followed by Research jobs... Now China has l everything it needs to build new technology: Manufacturing + qualified labour + brains... Just yesterday i was thinking: Can US build a LCD with 100% us manufactured components... I'm thinking the answer is No.
BSD licensed software can't be stolen....
before china and the west come into conflict of interest. That is why we need to move industry out of there to vietnam or another friendly country.
One unintended consequence of the CIA's armed UAV air strikes is the US has basically said it is legal to target persons in third countries with UAVs. Sooner or later the Chinese will do the same. The US will protest, and China will remind them that they are only doing what the CIA has been doing for years.
Ya kidding right? Do you think there's a factory in Wyoming that makes UAVs or something?
How we know is more important than what we know.
My guess is: none. The notorious mode operandi of chinese military industry is to buy one or two pieces of a particular equipment (for instance, the finnish Patria AMV), pull it apart to the last bolt and nut, and copy the design. Chinese are supreme artists in this, and thanks to their powerful and flexible industrial base, they can start up production faster than anyone on Earth (at this point.
Various countries have sold them military drones. My guess is that none of those displayed is fruit of chinese R&D.
"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=5056235&c=AIR&s=TOP
http://sidelobe.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/zhuhai-unusual-models-on-display/
An almost tyrant government with great military power. This never ended well for humanity whenever it happened in history.
A tiny UAV can't carry any meaningful cargo
A comment which shows a surprising lack of imagination. How much does $5 million worth of diamonds weigh? Or how about large numbers of flights carrying small amounts of say, cocaine or heroin?
We have numerous technologies for shooting down missiles
Yes but this is a model aircraft traveling at 35mph and 100ft in the air, with virtually no heat signature (especially the electric ones powered by lithium batteries) and very little radar signature. How will your 5 million dollar missile distinguish between this and ground clutter?
As for infrastructure - right. You won't bust bunkers with this, but I wonder what a couple of them filled with incendiary material could do to a petrochemical tank farm or an oil refinery...
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
As far as I know we haven't outsourced our UAV development, so back to the topic of the article about UAV's and lets try to compare what they have copied.
Of course you mean we haven't legally outsourced our UAV development to China.
Hawks don't think that way though; the basic premise is the enemy is so intrinsically evil that your only option is to be evil first, beating him to the punch. Thus (by definition) a provocation or bad precedent by the good guys is just a head start on what would have happened anyways, since (unfortunately) the bad guys are so evil.