Slashdot Mirror


Swedish Man Fined For Posting Links To Online Video Feeds

hcs_$reboot writes with a snippet from TechDirt (citing TorrentFreak): "Over in Sweden, it appears that a guy has been fined for linking to an online broadcast of a hockey game. We've heard stories of people getting in trouble merely for linking to unauthorized content, but this story is even more ridiculous. The guy wasn't linking to unauthorized content. He was linking to an online video feed from the official broadcaster, Canal Plus. The issue was that Canal Plus was apparently technically incompetent in how they set up the feeds, and never intended to make the feeds public."

8 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What constitutes unauthorized access? by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some even ask you to pay to view their public content, or else they will sue. http://news.slashdot.org/news/10/10/27/2134236.shtml

  2. Re:What constitutes unauthorized access? by Xugumad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No.

    If they linked it from their front page, and said "View the game here", that's implicitly authorising access. If it was hidden behind a badly done pay wall, I think it fairly clearly implies you should be paying first, even if the technical side is a debacle.

    Leaving something unprotected is no more implying access than leaving your front door open. It's bloody stupid, but that's another matter entirely...

  3. Re:Damn it Sweden! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I guess the whole Pirate Bay issue introduced them to the wonderful world of corporate bribery.

    We got a suitable saying around here, along the lines of: once your reputation is ruined, you might as well lose all restraint.

  4. Re:If it is on the internet it is public by AxeTheMax · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If it was hidden behind a badly done pay wall, I think it fairly clearly implies you should be paying first, even if the technical side is a debacle.... leaving something unprotected is no more implying access than leaving your front door open. It's bloody stupid, but that's another matter entirely...

    Anything on the internet that is reachable without security is public by definition. Doesn't matter if it was also 'behind' a paywall; it it could be reached by a straightforward url without going through the paywall, then it was public. And it is a false analogy to compare it to the front door of a private house; it was a business website that invited access, even if it only wanted paying access. Using the locked door analogy, it is as if a pay to view facility (a cinema or museum say) had a pay counter on one street door, but left another open.

  5. Re:Damn it Sweden! by pla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You do realize Sweden used to do forced sterilization of retards and undesireables here up to the late 1950s? It was only formally abolished in 1975[...] All to create a pure society, free from weakness.

    Of course, the funny thing about that?

    It largely worked - They have one of the happiest, healthiest, most attractive nations on the frickin' planet (the present fallout of US bullying notwithstanding).

    When trying to make eugenics look like a monstrosity, you'd do better not to point out its successes.

  6. Re:Never visit Sweden by Khenke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not the laws that are flawed, it's our judges in the courts.
    A good lawyer can tweak any country's law to prove anything, it's the judges role to keep em in control.

    The Swedish judges have over the last year broken the constitution over and over and over, and no one care.
    It has gone so far that yes I do think they are bribed. Either with money or power (fast track to higher positions).

    But the worst thing is that no one (almost no one) cares. If I tell people that the judges break the constitution they don't react at all. Nothing. Blank.
    If that is from lack of interest or knowledge I don't know, but I guess both.

    We in Sweden are so used to get fucked by the authorities now days that it looks like we have just given up.
    I used to say that not for anything in the world I would live in the USA because money can buy anything, and now Sweden has become a puppet to the states. It's time to migrate to Norway (our brother country that are not as corrupt, yet).

  7. BadAnalogyGuy? Is that you? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "To play devil's advocate: the fact that I didn't lock my front door is not a reasonable assumption that I am inviting you to enter my apartment."

    If your "house" is a website on the net, and the stuff they "took" is still there when they are done, than it absolutely should be expected. For some reason when I "break in" and "take stuff" from millions of other websites, they don't even notice or care (save that they encourage it in most cases.)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  8. Re:What constitutes unauthorized access? by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's better than that. It's like asking for some photocopies, and the dude with power of attorney says "sure, just let me copy them real quick, here you go! Now, remember, it's all copyrighted unless I say otherwise, but tell your friends to ask me if they want a copy!"