The Software That Failed To Compete With Windows
harrymcc writes "When Microsoft shipped Windows 1.0 back in November 1985 — it turned 25 on Saturday — it wasn't clear that its much-delayed windowing add-on for DOS was going to succeed. After all, it was a late arrival to a market that was already teeming with ambitious competitors. A quarter-century later, it's worth remembering the early Windows rivals that didn't make it: Visi On, Top View, GEM, DESQview, and more."
Your solid and detailed argument of "Neuromancer on C64 had better graphics than on Windows" is such a solid argument I'm just not sure where to start attacking it...
OS/2 rightfully isn't on that list...
...but then, of course, OS/2 was 1/2 of an operating system.
You deserve your three digit /. ID :)
"The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
This is slashdot.
If slashdot users are using it, then it failed in the real world.
I still use OS/2 whenever I need to format 2 floppy disks at once while compiling C-Kermit and browsing the web.
That "need" come up often?