Slashdot Mirror
Boy Finds £2.5M Gold Locket With Metal Detector
Instead of bottle caps and ridicule from his peers, 3-year-old James Hyatt found a locket worth millions with his metal detector. James and his dad found the gold locket last May in Essex. Since then the 500-year-old treasure has been appraised at around £2.5million. From the article: "James’s father Jason, 34, said: ‘My son is one of the luckiest people ever. If we go to the doctors he’ll put his hand down the side of the sofa and pull out a tenner.’"
Under the British Treasure Act of 1996, such a find like this belongs to the Crown. However, the boy may be compensated as a reward by the Secretary of State.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/24/section/10
Section 4 of the Treasure Act
(1)When treasure is found, it vests, subject to prior interests and rights—
(a)in the franchisee, if there is one;
(b)otherwise, in the Crown.
My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
It is defined in the first section of the law:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/24/section/1
Meaning of 'Treasure'
(1)Treasure is—
(a)any object at least 300 years old when found which—
(i)is not a coin but has metallic content of which at least 10 per cent by weight is precious metal;
(ii)when found, is one of at least two coins in the same find which are at least 300 years old at that time and have that percentage of precious metal; or
(iii)when found, is one of at least ten coins in the same find which are at least 300 years old at that time;
(b)any object at least 200 years old when found which belongs to a class designated under section 2(1);
(c)any object which would have been treasure trove if found before the commencement of section 4;
(d)any object which, when found, is part of the same find as—
(i)an object within paragraph (a), (b) or (c) found at the same time or earlier; or
(ii)an object found earlier which would be within paragraph (a) or (b) if it had been found at the same time.
(2)Treasure does not include objects which are—
(a)unworked natural objects, or
(b)minerals as extracted from a natural deposit,
or which belong to a class designated under section 2(2).
The object found was at least 300 years old and "(i)is not a coin but has metallic content of which at least 10 per cent by weight is precious metal;". Thus, it will likely fall under the definition found in the statute.
My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
It is if you are willing to live a modest lifestyle. Even if you only get a 1% return on your investments, that is still 40k a year, fairly close to the US national average income. 2% is 80k and that is a respectable middle class income. If you can manage 4% or 5% you are looking at a wealthy lifestyle forever.
Not so crazy now, is it?
I used to work right on Waikiki beach, and every morning I'd see these old guys out there with their thousand+ dollar detectors and sifters.
every time I'd ask on of these guys what they find, they'd say "keys...lots and lots of keys".
If you found a buried metal detector with a metal detector...would the universe implode?
Don't worry; for that you need a metal detector detector, AKA a meta-detector.
Promote proofreading. Don't mod up sloppy posts.
Bah first rule of digging up pirate treasure is that you don't tell people you just found pirate treasure. Just be glad you didn't know the truth or they would have had to run you through with a cutlass (which they also found).
Awesome, another internet expert.
And get what? $600 for the 1/2 oz of gold? Yeah, that'd be smart.