Slashdot Mirror


Boy Finds £2.5M Gold Locket With Metal Detector

Instead of bottle caps and ridicule from his peers, 3-year-old James Hyatt found a locket worth millions with his metal detector. James and his dad found the gold locket last May in Essex. Since then the 500-year-old treasure has been appraised at around £2.5million. From the article: "James’s father Jason, 34, said: ‘My son is one of the luckiest people ever. If we go to the doctors he’ll put his hand down the side of the sofa and pull out a tenner.’"

3 of 169 comments (clear)

  1. Treasure Act of 1996 by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Under the British Treasure Act of 1996, such a find like this belongs to the Crown. However, the boy may be compensated as a reward by the Secretary of State.

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/24/section/10

    Section 4 of the Treasure Act

    (1)When treasure is found, it vests, subject to prior interests and rights—

    (a)in the franchisee, if there is one;

    (b)otherwise, in the Crown.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    1. Re:Treasure Act of 1996 by g1zmo · · Score: 3, Informative

      FTFA:

      The reliquary has been declared treasure trove at an inquest, meaning the proceeds of its sale will be shared between James’s family and the landowner.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
  2. Re:Correct Link by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is defined in the first section of the law:

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/24/section/1

    Meaning of 'Treasure'

    (1)Treasure is—

    (a)any object at least 300 years old when found which—

    (i)is not a coin but has metallic content of which at least 10 per cent by weight is precious metal;

    (ii)when found, is one of at least two coins in the same find which are at least 300 years old at that time and have that percentage of precious metal; or

    (iii)when found, is one of at least ten coins in the same find which are at least 300 years old at that time;

    (b)any object at least 200 years old when found which belongs to a class designated under section 2(1);

    (c)any object which would have been treasure trove if found before the commencement of section 4;

    (d)any object which, when found, is part of the same find as—

    (i)an object within paragraph (a), (b) or (c) found at the same time or earlier; or

    (ii)an object found earlier which would be within paragraph (a) or (b) if it had been found at the same time.

    (2)Treasure does not include objects which are—

    (a)unworked natural objects, or

    (b)minerals as extracted from a natural deposit,

    or which belong to a class designated under section 2(2).

    The object found was at least 300 years old and "(i)is not a coin but has metallic content of which at least 10 per cent by weight is precious metal;". Thus, it will likely fall under the definition found in the statute.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.