Slashdot Mirror


Utah vs. NASA On Heavy-Lift Rocket Design

FleaPlus writes "Utah congressmen Orrin Hatch, Bob Bennett, Rob Bishop, and Jim Matheson issued a statement claiming that NASA's design process for a new congressionally-mandated heavy-lift rocket system may be trying to circumvent the law. According to the congressmen and their advisors from solid rocket producer ATK, the heavy-lift legislation's requirements can only be met by rockets utilizing ATK's solid rocket boosters. They are alarmed that NASA is also considering other approaches, such as all-liquid designs based on the rockets operated by the United Launch Alliance and SpaceX. ATK's solid rockets were arguably responsible for many of the safety and cost problems which plagued NASA's canceled Ares rocket system."

13 of 285 comments (clear)

  1. You dont... by MrQuacker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You don't need to be a rocket scientist to figure out what lobbyist wrote that clause of the bill...

    1. Re:You dont... by camperdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In this case the law is effectively mandating that NASA use a particular supplier: ATK. As I understand it, the authorization bill for the new rocket system specifies that it must be a shuttle derived system; the idea being that it is cheaper to use what you've already developed than to start from scratch. The problem with this approach, now that the shuttle program is at an end, is that a number of the facilities that manufacture the shuttle systems have been shut down and dismantled. It may not be cheaper anymore.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:You dont... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, look at the context,

      Saddam was Irans biggest enemy, the one they'd fought a war against.

      The Taliban were the next most dangerous,

      The US destroyed Saddam, installing a pro-Iranian regime in Iraq.

      They removed the Taliban from power, leaving Afghanistan with an Iranian funded government,

      Which enemy of Iran will the US destroy next? Saudi or the USA?

      My money is on the USA. The process is already advanced.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  2. I'm confused by tancque · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A law to dictate which supplier to use? That sounds like something from soviet Russia.
    Every time I think I remotely understand the US something shows that doesn't make sense.

    --
    Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast!
    1. Re:I'm confused by FridayBob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like most businesses, ATK will hate paying taxes (and likely bend over backwards to avoid doing that), but obviously love receiving tax money in the form of government contracts. It also looks like they've worked hard at oiling a number of prominent state politicians to make sure they keep those contracts regardless of whether their technology is outdated or not.

  3. Read this as.... by Eggplant62 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We got bought by this rocket manufacturer right here and we promised them that, with our legislation, they'd get all the business from NASA. Now, NASA is tossing a monkey wrench into the whole works because they want to consider other rocket manufacturers, and our feet are being held to the fire to deliver on what we promised. We can't let NASA just select any old rocket manufacturer or we'll end up in cement shoes at the bottom of the ocean.

  4. Re:Utah sucks... by unkiereamus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the people in Utah are happy, what does it matter what the other 49 states think of them? That's what freedom is all about.

    Of course if Utah came begging for a bailout, like what Greece and Ireland did in the EU, then I suggest we tell them "too bad" and let them figure it out by themselves. Same goes for California, New York, or any other state that overspent beyond their means. But overall I think Utah has been well-behaved and limited spending, and therefore doesn't deserve the criticism you aim at them.

    In 2005 (the last year I could easily find number for) CA received 79 cents of federal spending for every federal tax dollar paid, NY was 78 cents and Utah was $1.07. To give you some framework for those numbers, CA works out to have sent ~$286,627,000,000 to the Federal Government, and received ~$242,023,000,000 dollars worth of federal funding. A disparity of 44 billion.

    Who's bailing out who exactly?

    --
    I needed a sig so people would know who I am, but I was too drunk to make something witty, so you get this instead.
  5. Re:Move along, nothing to see by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just a question? Is it not the responsibility of Congressmen to represent their constituents? I'm not stating anything about the validity of what they are saying, I'm just pointing out that one reason Congressmen (and women) are elected is to represent their state. So in this case, these Congressmen are doing their jobs. Again, I didn't state anything about lobbying or science; I was making a purely political point.

  6. Hey, what happended to all that Tea Party shit? by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess the election is over and Republicans don't have to play pretend anymore.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  7. PIGS IN SPAAAAAAACEEEE!!!! by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hey, wait, you're considering designs that don't mandate using boosters built by a specific contractor based in our state? That can't be legal.
    Too bad we can't vote to recall senators from other states.

    The pork must flow.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  8. Politicans need to leave NASA alone by jonwil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Back when Wernher Von Braun created the Saturn 5, he was given the freedom to design the BEST rocket for the job. And that rocket put 12 men on the surface of the moon.

    When they built the space shuttle, they made compromises in its design in order to ensure companies located in key congressional districts got contracts and as a result, the Shuttle Challenger blew up and killed 7 people. (I have no clue if the aforementioned design compromises were responsible for Columbia)

    The politicians need to leave NASA alone and let NASA buy and fly the BEST rocket for the job. Regardless of whether that rocket is made by ATK, Boeing, SpaceX, the Russians or some guys on a sheep station in the Australian Outback. And they need to get out of the way of the private space industry and let it thrive, only getting involved in so far as ensuring that 3rd parties and their property are not harmed/damaged and that the work done by these space companies is not turned into nuclear missiles aimed at downtown DC.

  9. Re:Move along, nothing to see by Raenex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just a question? Is it not the responsibility of Congressmen to represent their constituents?

    Within reason. They are also supposed to do what's right for the country. Pork that ends up harming the rest of the nation is unethical politics.

  10. Re:Corrupt politicians owned by lobbyists by Javagator · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If everyone knows that all politicians are corrupt ... then why do we never do anything about it?"

    These politicians are from Utah and they are stealing for the people of Utah. You don't vote out the crooks when they are your crooks.