Slashdot Mirror


PayPal Demos Auto-Debit Gumball Machine

ForgedArtificer writes "At their recent developers conference in San Diego, CA, PayPal unveiled a proof-of-concept gumball machine that would instantly pay for a gumball through a PayPal account using a smart phone and a QR code, sending a confirmation of the purchase through Twitter. Ok, maybe we all don't really care if we can get a gumball without a quarter, but the possibilities for this technology are endless."

124 comments

  1. endless possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "but the possibilities for this technology are endless."

    Seems Slashdot editors can't even seem to spell 'beginningless'

    1. Re:endless possibilities by Sulphur · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought you paid for police chases afterwards.

    2. Re:endless possibilities by zonky · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, everyone will be able to quickly and easily swap cheap payments via paypal, then there will be a fraud allegation, and someone's paypal account will be frozen permanently.

      People stupid enough to trust paypal with their record of appalling behaviour deserve what they get.

    3. Re:endless possibilities by Lillebo · · Score: 1

      ...with their record of appalling behaviour...

      Could you please elaborate on these allegations?

    4. Re:endless possibilities by xaxa · · Score: 1

      "but the possibilities for this technology are endless."

      The example given in the article is crap: "Imagine that you read the first chapter of a book at a friend's house and would like to buy it to read the rest. Pull out your phone and with two quick taps a copy is being shipped to you through Amazon."
      You can already do this, books have barcodes printed on them! I've bought CDs on Amazon while at a friend's house doing this.

      I don't think there are any more possibilities than my contactless credit card provides, except that this is on a phone, but in Japan (and Hong Kong?) they have contactless payment modules on their phone.

    5. Re:endless possibilities by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I don't know if they're "endless" or not, but I see one fatal flaw in it: It involves PayPal.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  2. Twitter by jrumney · · Score: 4, Funny

    sending a confirmation of the purchase through Twitter.

    My wife is looking forward to when the local strip club starts using this technology. Privacy be damned.

    1. Re:Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .... Strippers will now start getting QR codes tattooed.

    2. Re:Twitter by meyekul · · Score: 1

      I doubt that the stripper will like where you are sticking your phone, though. I mean, dollar bills are intrusive enough...

  3. Banking regulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How is PayPal *not* a bank again? O.o

    1. Re:Banking regulations. by igreaterthanu · · Score: 2, Informative

      PayPal is a registered bank.

      --
      I dream of a nation where a man is not judged by his skin color but by an number assigned by a credit rating agency.
    2. Re:Banking regulations. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Informative

      PayPal is [paypal.com] a registered bank.

      Depending on where you are. From your link:

      https://www.paypal.com/uk/
      "PayPal was granted a bank license with the Luxembourg bank authority."
      "PayPal Luxembourg will be regulated to the same standard as all major European banks. Banking laws and standards in the European Union ensure that customers are just as protected by a Luxembourg bank as by a UK, French, or German bank."

      Not a lot of good outside the EU.

    3. Re:Banking regulations. by Tolkien · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep. Everywhere else they are entirely unregulated, and they will definitely want it to stay that way for as long as they can get away with it.

    4. Re:Banking regulations. by cob666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      PayPal wants everybody to believe that its a simple escrow service but I agree that its acting more and more like a bank, if they are considered a banking entity in the UK and other countries in Europe then they should be operating as a bank in the US. PayPal simply has far too much control over YOUR money and regardless of what their TOS state it should be far more difficult for them to arbitrarily hold people's money and/or freeze their account.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    5. Re:Banking regulations. by hedwards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An escrow service doesn't generally get to keep the money that it's moving. Usually they get some sort of a cut of the transfer whether or not it's successful. But the remainder has to be given to either of the two parties involved in all cases. Either the intended recipient or if that's not possible back to the originating party.

      Paypal however takes the position that in the middle they own the money and can do with it what they like. They can pass in on as intended or they can refund it back or secret option C they can just keep it and drag their feet giving it back.

    6. Re:Banking regulations. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I don't understand; if you know that they operate a certain way, why would you let them have your money in the first place? You say they need to be regulated as a bank, but why is that necessary if you can protect yourself from them by not having anything to do with them in the first place?

    7. Re:Banking regulations. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1, Interesting

      True. But increasingly, some avenues only accept PayPal. eBay being the obvious one.
      e.g. Last year, I needed a new bulb for my DLP flat panel TV. Everywhere else, it was $3-4-500. Found several, new(?) on eBay for $100. The only payment allowed/accepted was PayPal. No way I'm linking PayPal to an actual account of mine that has actual money/credit. So...go to the local drugstore, buy a prepaid card, put enough money in it to cover, link that card to a PayPal acct....then actually buy the thing. PITA, especially if I were buying regularly from eBay.

    8. Re:Banking regulations. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Well how else are they going to raid money from people for 'infractions'.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    9. Re:Banking regulations. by t33jster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yep. Everywhere else they are entirely unregulated, and they will definitely want it to stay that way for as long as they can get away with it.

      Well, not exactly unregulated, but unless you're specific about what sort of regulations you feel are missing, the rest of this is purely pedantic. It's much more of a clusterfuck than that. For instance, I count 42 states (well, 41 + a District) here. As a former employee of PayPal's AML Compliance department, I can tell you that paypal is regulated (AML/CTF - not consumer protection regulations which is probably what you're bitching about) in the US (FinCEN), Canada (FinTRAC), Australia (AusTRAC), China (HK Police) the EU (CSSF) and anywhere outside of that in Singapore (MAS). A year ago when I left, there was talk of adding legal entities in 4 or 5 other countries, primarily in Asia and Latin America.

      To the GP's point about why PayPal is not a bank (in the US anyhow), is that US banks issue credit and US money service businesses merely move money. I would certainly concede that the Bill Me Later unit of PayPal is operates purely on the technicality of the laws and/or regulations that separate banks from MSBs (BML makes a decision on whether to extend credit, then a bank issues the credit with the understanding that BML will buy the debt a few days later). There was often talk of becoming a bank, or at least chartering a subsidiary bank in order to allow the credit issuing to move completely in house. Ebay divesting Skype was supposedly a part of that plan, although I never understood why, nor can I say whether PayPal is any closer to becoming (or more likely starting) a bank. More of what PayPal does falls under the EU's legal definition of a bank, so PayPal is a bank there.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' for great justice.
    10. Re:Banking regulations. by Shoten · · Score: 1

      Simple: their customer service is WAY more self serving than that of any real bank!

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    11. Re:Banking regulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I needed a new bulb for my DLP flat panel TV.

      No-one "needs" anything for a TV. Just dump it when it breaks again, you'll find you have a lot more time in life.

    12. Re:Banking regulations. by blackdew · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure how it works in most of the world, but here the law applies to anyone. Registration as a bank gives you some protection from those laws (stuff like money laundering and tax evasion by your clients) and in return you have more reporting to do and have to follow some basic regulations set by the national bank.

      I sure as hell hope that in most of the world (or at least those countries where paypal have representation and assets) anyone who actually looses money from their actions can go to court and have them pay back disregarding registration as bank, this is how sane laws work.

    13. Re:Banking regulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it should be far more difficult for them to arbitrarily hold people's money and/or freeze their account.

      Makes me think of this situation.

      Where Paypal completely fucked over charitable donations by locking it down, blocked returns for a while, and then...this.

      Although it's taken over a day for them to do it, they are issuing complete refunds (except for foreign money orders; anybody who used Paypal to convert foreign currency to US dollars have lost money on the "conversion fees"... despite the fact NO PHYSICAL MONEY CHANGED HANDS. I guess the mere process of adding one of those stupid "£" signs to a series of virtual numbers costs a lot of money).

    14. Re:Banking regulations. by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      eBay sellers can accept other forms of payment. The catch is, only the potential buyer can bring up the subject. You may not be able to mention in your listings that you accept any forms other than PayPal, but there is nothing stopping you from informing the buyers of what eBay's policies actually allow. You just have to be able to word it so that you are not actually soliciting other forms of payment.

      Then again, I don't think eBay is cracking down too hard on alternate payments anyway, because I do not think that they are quite stupid enough to not realize that they will make more money from a sale that is paid by a method other than PayPal than they would make from a sale that does not happen at all.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    15. Re:Banking regulations. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      So, this inconvenience justifies forcing PayPal by law to behave differently, even though they aren't forcing anything on you?

    16. Re:Banking regulations. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume he cares only about himself, and not about other people who might not know about their practices?
      That's like saying Madoff shouldn't be arrested, as long as you know you shouldn't put your money there.

      (Working) regulation sets a minimum standard below which we as a society don't want business to work. People shouldn't have to be guinea pigs to find out about such practices.

    17. Re:Banking regulations. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      One could say the same about Slashdot, yet here you are.

    18. Re:Banking regulations. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Even in the EU it isn't that much help. For example in the UK when there is fraud on an account the bank has to prove that the customer was negligent or absorb the cost of putting it right themselves. Some banks tried to weasle out of it by claiming things like Chip & Pin made fraud impossible unless the customer gave away their PIN but the regulator made it very clear that was not the case.

      PayPal on the other hand assume you are guilty until you can prove otherwise.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:Banking regulations. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What I see is a (possible) mixing of businesses... a "cartel" if you will. But for example, if you buy something from ebay, by default they will automatically ship it to your PayPal address, whether you asked them to or not.

      Once I sold an item via ebay to someone in Italy, even though I specified that my sale would only be to US customers, because even though his listed address with ebay was in Italy, his PayPal address was in California, and ebay went with that. WTF??? What if I was selling something that was illegal to sell outside the US? I could be tricked into it if someone buys via ebay.

      They can't claim to be separate companies if they are sharing all their records willy-nilly! Or, as in this case, saying the OTHER company's data is more valid than your own.

    20. Re:Banking regulations. by delinear · · Score: 1

      He saved time by not signing in, though.

    21. Re:Banking regulations. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed anyone uses it unless they are forced to by eBay because not only are the fees very high but the amount of fraud that takes places is too.

      Fraud on PayPal is common because the dispute resolution system is flawed and makes it too easy for people to make bogus claims. Say you buy something but the seller sends it by normal post instead of getting a signature on delivery. You can claim you never got and there is pretty much nothing they can do to counter your claim so you will get your money back. In contrast if you bought the item via Google Checkout they only care about the trasaction so if you wanted to make a false claim it would have to be via Small Claims Court or something. That alone seems to keep people honest.

      I know some people who habitually claim for anything they didn't sign for on receipt via PayPal. There does not seem to be any checking or statistics kept on the frequency of claims so they can do it as often as they like. One guy I know got in ~30 PS3s with the Yellow Light of Death fault to fix and then re-sell but as most of them came from private sellers who didn't know about the PayPal scam he ended up paying for about of a quarter of them with the rest refunded.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:Banking regulations. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Meh, my browser signs in for me. Vimperator macros ftw.

    23. Re:Banking regulations. by ccguy · · Score: 1

      "PayPal Luxembourg will be regulated to the same standard as all major European banks. Banking laws and standards in the European Union ensure that customers are just as protected by a Luxembourg bank as by a UK, French, or German bank."
      Not a lot of good outside the EU.

      Not any good here either. They still do things like blocking access to funds for a any amount of time they want, demand lots of documentation at any time. In Spain for example they don't have a contact phone, physical address, or any place to go with the documentation to. In order to protect themselves about possible fraud they want you to send so much documentation that anyone that can get it (paypal employee, mailman whatever) can easily open bank accounts, credit cards, etc on your name.

      Anyway, the competition is even worse. Moneybookers for example owes me 400 euros. At some point they decided that I had used my account too much, so they want to know how was I. They wanted a color photocopy of my passport so I told them to fuck off and close the account. They said 'OK, but we are keeping your funds until you send us what we asked for'.

      Again, I'm OK with going somewhere with my passport or ID, have an employee check it and get it back without any copy made. Asking for anything else is unreasonable.

    24. Re:Banking regulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I stopped buying from e-bay. I have not logged into my account there sense they mandated that all sellers accepts paypal.

    25. Re:Banking regulations. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed anyone uses it unless they are forced to by eBay because not only are the fees very high but the amount of fraud that takes places is too.

      The fees aren't that high - they're in line with a lot of other merchant accounts. And Paypal's so far the ONLY way for a small time seller to accept a credit card, which is the universal online payment mechanism. It's why Paypal and eBay are so closely tied together - they need each other. If you're selling some old junk you found in your attic, getting a merchant account is next to impossible unless you're planning on doing at least a certain amount of business every month. And yet, having to have the buyer go out and get a cheque or money order, mail it out, having to wait for it to arrive, then you going to deposit it and waiting for it to clear, then shipping... it can easily take a month.

      The funny thing is, how come there's no alternative to Paypal? If I want to sell my one item online, I'd like to accept credit cards, yet no one is offering me a small-use merchant account other than Paypal. Because if you can't accept a credit card online, you can't really be an online store. Gift cards maybe, but unless you're big enough to have people stocking them, same issue. Google Checkout's just a glorified merchant account, too - unless you're a business, you can't really have a checkout account.

      Also, some people use Paypal because we're fed up of having to change our cards annually because some processor or another had their data stolen. Happened to me last year (bank called about a fraudulent charge) and this year (a store's credit card processor got broken into). It's why you should be VERY cautious if you see any iTunes charges on your card as people test credit card numbers. (iTunes is a very popular way to test credit cards because you can easily make a new account and charge something cheap to it).

    26. Re:Banking regulations. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The fees aren't that high - they're in line with a lot of other merchant accounts. And Paypal's so far the ONLY way for a small time seller to accept a credit card, which is the universal online payment mechanism.

      I am a small time seller and I use Google Checkout. It is open to individuals and free to sign up to. The fees are about 1/4 those of PayPal.

      You can use it in a variety of ways including emailed invoices, simply "buy now" buttons, Google's own shopping cart or any number of others.

      It's why Paypal and eBay are so closely tied together - they need each other.

      No, it's because eBay owns PayPal so they refuse to allow any competing systems.

      how come there's no alternative to Paypal? If I want to sell my one item online, I'd like to accept credit cards, yet no one is offering me a small-use merchant account other than Paypal. Because if you can't accept a credit card online, you can't really be an online store. Gift cards maybe, but unless you're big enough to have people stocking them, same issue. Google Checkout's just a glorified merchant account, too - unless you're a business, you can't really have a checkout account.

      Clearly you know nothing about Google Checkout because everything you just said is wrong. It isn't a merchant account at all, it is in fact fairly similar to PayPal for individuals. Actually it is better because the interface is easier to work with and fraud is lower.

      Also, some people use Paypal because we're fed up of having to change our cards annually because some processor or another had their data stolen.

      Similar to PayPal the seller does not see any of the buyer's card details on Google Checkout. All you can see is if it passed the various anti-fraud checks they do.

      Personally I trust Google far more than PayPal to keep my personal data safe. PayPal has been hacked in the past and is also rife with buyer fraud.

      Google Checkout has never lost any data as far as I am aware.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re:Banking regulations. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      No-one "needs" anything for a TV. Just dump it when it breaks again, you'll find you have a lot more time in life.

      Would it make a difference to your snooty anonymous ass if I said it was for my 61" PC monitor? Because that's what it's mostly used for.

  4. My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by igreaterthanu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My smart phone does. This will never be able to replace other forms of money until they get that one sorted.

    --
    I dream of a nation where a man is not judged by his skin color but by an number assigned by a credit rating agency.
    1. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by ziggyzaggy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      your credit card can't make 25 cent payments. I believe we'll go to a cashless society, all electronic money. That way the banking cartel can get a cut of every transaction no matter how small, and the government can tax, monitor and control all transactions no matter how small. If they consider you a pestilent person, they will cut off your ability to buy and sell.

    2. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your credit card can't make 25 cent payments.

      Sure it can. It may not be practical, at the moment, given the way the processors and card issuers structure their fees, but it's absolutely possible.

      I believe we'll go to a cashless society, all electronic money. That way the banking cartel can get a cut of every transaction no matter how small, and the government can tax, monitor and control all transactions no matter how small. If they consider you a pestilent person, they will cut off your ability to buy and sell.

      Government will never enact legislation that would inhibit cash bribes.

    3. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by igreaterthanu · · Score: 1

      I just used a credit card as an example that the majority of Slashdot readers can understand. Normally I would use this which charges no fees to either me or the merchant. I would use that to buy something for 25cents and the merchant would not complain at all.

      --
      I dream of a nation where a man is not judged by his skin color but by an number assigned by a credit rating agency.
    4. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by Nermal6693 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. My first thought when reading the summary was "how is this any different from swiping an EFTPOS card?". Obviously it's using a phone instead of a card, but the net result is the same.

    5. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by igreaterthanu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      how is this any different from swiping an EFTPOS card?

      PayPal gets it's 1% or whatever the current rate is.

      --
      I dream of a nation where a man is not judged by his skin color but by an number assigned by a credit rating agency.
    6. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by snookums · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm pretty sure EFTPOS does cost the merchant, but it's a small flat fee per transaction (I think something on the order of 10c), rather than a percentage of the sale that a credit card company charges. This is why most merchants do have a minimum EFTPOS transaction amount (often $5 or $10).

      --
      Be careful. People in masks cannot be trusted.
    7. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by noidentity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here in the US we have a device which also charges no fees to either the buyer or the seller. They have a nice feature in that if you lose one, nobody can access the rest of your money.

    8. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by igreaterthanu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Holding US currency is essentially the same as giving the Federal Reserve an interest free loan and it takes much longer to count and hand out change than most electronic transactions. In addition it is nice and easy for any thief to steal. Yes cash is good for fall-back but it has it's issues as well.

      --
      I dream of a nation where a man is not judged by his skin color but by an number assigned by a credit rating agency.
    9. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by jrumney · · Score: 2, Informative

      It depends on which country you're talking about. There is no standard for debit cards, as there is for credit cards. In the UK, debit cards incur a flat fee, which is why you see a lot of signs in shops specifying a minimum purchase for debit card use. In New Zealand, which has the highest debit card use in the world (and where debit cards are colloqually known as EFTPOS cards), there is no charge to the merchant.

    10. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Government will never enact legislation that would inhibit cash bribes.

      You can execute bribes in 25 cent increments? Cue the two bit _____ jokes.

    11. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Holding US currency is essentially the same as giving the Federal Reserve an interest free loan
      It is but then holding money in your paypal account is essentially the same as giving paypal an interest free loan and many accounts at banks (particularly business current accounts) also pay negligible interest.

      In addition it is nice and easy for any thief to steal.
      On the other hand the money at risk is limited to the ammount of cash you have on-hand. With a credit or debit card the ammount of money at risk can be much less.

      Depending on your local laws you may not personally be liable for that theft but someone's got to pay for it (often the merchant that accepts the fraudulent transaction).

      it takes much longer to count and hand out change than most electronic transactions
      hmm, given the response speed of most "chip and pin" credit card terminals i've used or the time it takes to sign a receipt and for the merchant to check that signature (badly) I somewhat doubt this. Most cashiers i've seen are pretty quick at picking change.

      Overall cash isn't perfect but so far all of the alternatives like to pile on fees and hassles such that for small transactions they aren't reasonable.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      can be much less.
      That should have said can be much greater

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    13. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by igreaterthanu · · Score: 1

      On the other hand the money at risk is limited to the ammount of cash you have on-hand. With a credit or debit card the ammount of money at risk can be much less.

      Not so if you have a card that requires a pin and will not work without a pin.

      Depending on your local laws you may not personally be liable for that theft but someone's got to pay for it

      True, but this assumes fraud actually takes place. With EFTPOS (which is different to Credit) a pin is required and the card will stop working after (3?) incorrect attempts. It is quite hard to find out what your pin is if you actually take care to cover the terminal when you enter it.

      it takes much longer to count and hand out change than most electronic transactions

      I have noticed the same with Chip and Pin, but EFTPOS is probably twice as quick, if not more. After swiping the card I can enter my pin almost instantly (unlike with Chip and Pin) and after entering a pin it usually takes about 2 seconds for the transaction to go through, during which I can be placing my card back in my wallet.

      --
      I dream of a nation where a man is not judged by his skin color but by an number assigned by a credit rating agency.
    14. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      >\

      Overall cash isn't perfect but so far all of the alternatives like to pile on fees and hassles such that for small transactions they aren't reasonable.

      I disagree entirely! I have tens of thousands of dollars stuffed under my mattress!

      Now if you'll excuse me, I'm feeling rather tired. I think I'll have a smoke before I fall asleep.

    15. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your credit card can't make 25 cent payments.

      I believe we'll go to a cashless society, all electronic money. That way the banking cartel can get a cut of every transaction no matter how small, and the government can tax, monitor and control all transactions no matter how small. If they consider you a pestilent person, they will cut off your ability to buy and sell.

      Here in Finland parking meters take credit cards just fine. I can pay minimum of 20 cents. Why wouldn't it be possible?

    16. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I have noticed the same with Chip and Pin, but EFTPOS is probably twice as quick, if not more. After swiping the card I can enter my pin almost instantly (unlike with Chip and Pin) and after entering a pin it usually takes about 2 seconds for the transaction to go through, during which I can be placing my card back in my wallet.

      EMV (Chip + PIN) cards have a microchip which performs encryption (a key is unlocked with the PIN and a key on the terminal), which is much slower then reading some numbers. It looks like NZ might be upgrading.

      Retailers don't have to use the chip, although almost all do as it reduces their liability (they aren't liable if a PIN is used and the card stolen). The only one I've found that doesn't is a branch of McDonald's. There I just swiped the card, and within a second it was "OK". The time saving is evidently worthwhile to McDonald's, for the sake of the cost of a burger.

    17. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Here in Finland parking meters take credit cards just fine. I can pay minimum of 20 cents. Why wouldn't it be possible?

      Of course, even if there's a 10c fee it's probably still cheaper than paying someone to collect the money from loads of parking meters and maintain the coin detection mechanisms.

      Parking meters with cash can also be a target for criminals.

    18. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention: here contactless cards allow payments of under £15 to be made quickly without a PIN.

      Visa's version..

      Last time I looked the only places you could use the cards were big coffee shops, now it seems loads of places have them. They should advertise them better!

    19. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by delinear · · Score: 1

      Not so if you have a card that requires a pin and will not work without a pin.

      Most cards have the fall back option of a signature (a lot of countries require this for disability discrimination reasons, not everyone can operate the keypads). Theoretically that should be reasonably secure, although anecdotally I've noticed these days they rarely check or care if the signature on the card matches the one you give them (I know this from personal experience as my own signature seems to look different every time I write it, they generally glance at it and process the payment anyway - I have been challenged on this precisely once in the almost 20 years that I've used a debit card).

    20. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by arth1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And how is this different from what people in Japan and parts of Europe has been doing things for a decade now, paying for small purchases from machines with their mobile phones, whether it be soda dispensers, parking fees, or fags.

      This is news, how? Except that you jump through hoops to pay through Paypal instead of simply getting it charged to your next phone bill?

    21. Re:My credit card doesn't run out of batteries by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

      My smart phone does. This will never be able to replace other forms of money until they get that one sorted.

      They already solved this a long time ago, you don't need any power in your phone to make a payment. PIN verification can be done at point of sale using the merchants terminal.

      Please don't think that your misunderstanding of the very basics of mobile NFC payments is validated by the moderators who also appear to misunderstand the very basics of mobile NFC payments.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  5. Pinball mabybe. by JDmetro · · Score: 0

    Gumball no.

    1. Re:Pinball mabybe. by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Slot machine?

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    2. Re:Pinball mabybe. by JDmetro · · Score: 0

      Gambling is a tax on people bad at math.
      Unless you are talking about a different kind of slot machine. You know the one that give you a black eye when you swipe your credit card through their crack.

    3. Re:Pinball mabybe. by delinear · · Score: 1

      Gambling is a tax on people bad at math.

      Whereas for those who are good at maths it can be quite lucrative.

    4. Re:Pinball mabybe. by JDmetro · · Score: 0

      And those who are good at lying can have a very lucrative career as a politician.

  6. Killer App by godunc · · Score: 1

    My wife is looking forward to when the local strip club starts using this technology. Privacy be damned.

    ...but it would be a great application for a lilypad arduino. (http://www.arduino.cc/en/Main/ArduinoBoardLilyPad)

  7. A: Because it disrupts the flow of a message by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Q: Why is starting a comment in the Subject: line incredibly irritating?

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:A: Because it disrupts the flow of a message by Cruorin · · Score: 0, Troll

      A: Because you are too lazy to read the subject lines

    2. Re:A: Because it disrupts the flow of a message by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The title is not the beginning of the first paragraph.

  8. Endless possibilities! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Endless possibilities! For PayPal. They're salivating at the thought of all that new money they can freeze indefinitely for whatever reason they can come up with.

  9. of course by Ryanrule · · Score: 2, Funny

    paypal gets a penny on every gumball

    1. Re:of course by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      Only a 4% fee? Are you sure? No 'small-value fee'? Or 'QR-code-usage surcharge'?

  10. No way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paypal - no way. Paypal with Twitter - absolutely, positively no way.

  11. Here come the overdrafts by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wonderful. Since Paypal is linked to checking accounts now you can expect that should a hold be placed on a check you deposit or if there's a bank error you'll be in for a $33.05 gumball.

    1. Re:Here come the overdrafts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it weren't for the recent legislation that requires people to opt-in to that "service".

      I've eaten my share of $37 hamburgers, and despite all of my strongest libertarian leanings, I have to say I smiled a bit when forced overdraft "protection" was outlawed.

    2. Re:Here come the overdrafts by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Didn't know about this, been complaining for years. I may need to have a word with my friendly banker.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    3. Re:Here come the overdrafts by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Or when paypal decides that even though you specified you wanted to pay with your credit card, it takes it out of your bank and refuses to stop trying to take the money out of your bank DESPITE the fact that they already got the money from your credit card, even when you call customer service. Fortunately my bank was understanding and now I am boycotting paypal. They want to play games, they can do so without my money.

    4. Re:Here come the overdrafts by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Never link your "real" bank account to Paypal. Only ever link a transactional account that you only put the amount of money in that you want to transfer to Paypal, or clear it to your real account when you withdraw from Paypal.

      It's sad that you have to do this, though. Once you give Paypal your bank account info, it has total access to your money.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  12. Endless? by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

    In the future your money will just slowly leak out of you?

    1. Re:Endless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/future/present

  13. Thank you by rshxd · · Score: 0

    May this innovation help people impulsively spend their money that they don't have

  14. ...endless stupidity by holophrastic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So let's see. The gumball is a simple sphere that cost a penny to produce, and was produced in a batch of thousands. The gumball machine -- read dispensor -- cost ten dollars to produce, adn was produced in a batch of hundreds. The consumer is standing not twelve inches away from a needless and insignificant candy treat.

    The perfect solution is not:

    a more expensive dispensor, more competant consumer, a mobile phone, a fancy barcode -- read smart phone -- a web-site -- read web browser -- a privacy policy -- actually four -- Internet infrastructure, cellular infrastructure, a phone plan, a data plan, customer service, tech support, a collections agency, anti-fraud measures, and a PIN.

    The perfect solution is a hammer. The quarter was already a nuissance. This is just stupid.

    Oh yeah, and a bank account. How silly of me.

    1. Re:...endless stupidity by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

      proof of concept. what are you so mad about?

    2. Re:...endless stupidity by holophrastic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not proof of concept. It's a fun sunday tinkering in the basement.

      Try to count the number of things you could do with that sort of concept -- actually. Then think about how many of those things would be better off as a result. Odds are, it's very close to none.

      People like to do such things -- link together a dozen systems to show how cool things can be when you link together a bunch of systems. And it is really cool -- it's like art. Entertaining and totally useless.

      It's almost never better to link together multiple systems as opposed to building a dedicated single-structure solution. Sure it's often cheaper, and faster, and worse, and worser, and worsest.

      A chain is only as strong as its weakest link -- because it has absolutely zero redundancy on any one of its many links. But it's easier and cheaper to manufacture, and it's more flexible than a cable.

      So what solution would have you rely on, in this case, your bank, twitter, your phone, your ISP, your phone plan, and the dispensor's isp, its plan, its twitter account, and its paypal account?

      Talk about surface area for bugs, adn for attack, and for privacy, fraud, and general distrust.

      The same would hold true no matter what you're buying over such a system.

    3. Re:...endless stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gumball machine cannot dispense candy right now. Please try again in 30 seconds.

    4. Re:...endless stupidity by delinear · · Score: 1

      Besides, the only place this is really useful is for micro-payments (if you're using it to purchase expensive goods or services you're really asking for trouble), and we're already coming up with better methods of doing that, both on cards and built directly into mobiles, so as a proof of concept it's a little late to the party.

    5. Re:...endless stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the closest I can see to a credstick so far. Need to have something on the drawing board for when the awakening happens and we all convert to the nuyen for currency.

    6. Re:...endless stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, profit is evil! Down with the capitalist pig-dogs!

    7. Re:...endless stupidity by andrea.sartori · · Score: 1

      It's a fun sunday tinkering in the basement.

      I know it's completely off-topic, but this is at least the 4th thread today where basements come out at a certain point. Is it Basement Day somewhere?

      --
      Mostly harmless.
    8. Re:...endless stupidity by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      Be sure to only purchase one gumball and wait. it may take up to 2 minutes to dispense your gumball.

      Your phone is now locked until the transaction completes.

  15. Technology is already used in Japan by Sepiraph · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think Japan is the among one of the first to widely adopt to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_payment

    1. Re:Technology is already used in Japan by Jeeeb · · Score: 1

      Living in Japan I find it to be little more than a poor substitute for a proper cash card. Unfortunately though proper electronic payment services are woefully under-developed here :(

      In Tokyo you can also use train passes to pay at vending machines and at department stores near the train station. Seems really high tech until you realise that it's just another ad-hoc solution to the fundamental problem of crappy electronic payment services.

      If you want somewhere to be jealous of take a look at somewhere like Australia. You can pay just about anywhere with an eftpos card. They charge a straight fee rather than a percentage of the price. They require a PIN rather than signing. You can withdraw money when paying with cards at shops and you can use them at any ATM in the country. Thanks to proper direct debit systems when making online purchases, rather than asking for your card details most Australian retailers just asked you to deposit money in their account with a reference number attached. No need to trust their credit card handling infrastructure.

      Anything less than that just seems at least a decade out of date. Even if it does involve your mobile phone. Or in this case your mobile phone + a long list of internet buzzwords.

    2. Re:Technology is already used in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite common in Finland also. I've used my phone to buy tram tickets, soda and pizza sometimes. Uses direct operator billing.

    3. Re:Technology is already used in Japan by LucidBeast · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Finland you can't find a soda machine that you can't pay with a mobile. You can also buy Pizza.

    4. Re:Technology is already used in Japan by icebraining · · Score: 1

      You could be describing Portugal. The ATM/debit card system is actually rather nice here.

    5. Re:Technology is already used in Japan by alvarl · · Score: 0

      Almost the same in Estonia, and increasingly so in other Baltic countries and many other places in Europe. The middle man may be different but this is pretty similar to what Fortumo is doing (fortumo.com). The wiki article sums it up.

    6. Re:Technology is already used in Japan by heneon · · Score: 1

      And at least you used to be able to order a pizza on a phone you just borrowed from someone on the street, for "an important call". Then give the phone back to the owner, walk to the pizza place, grab your pizza and the phone owner pays it in the phone bill. I am not sure if that is still possible, though...

    7. Re:Technology is already used in Japan by delinear · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it's pretty much exactly the same here in the UK. I use my debit card for almost all my payments (some shops have a minimum payment amount, most don't care because of the sheer volume they're dealing with). It's just so much more convenient than having to remember to get cash - and if I ever do need cash, as you said, the methods of getting it using the card are ubiquitous. Doing all of this via the phone seems like it's adding an unecessary layer of complication (not to mention having to remember to charge the phone up, or the fact that my £500 smart phone is probably a more tempting prospect to a thief than my PIN locked debit card, etc).

    8. Re:Technology is already used in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also being in Japan and using Mobile Suica all the time instead of cash.... I'm confused.. I think it is a *solution* to older crappy payment services.

      Unlike the Paypal solution, mobile suica is easy, fast, free, and doesn't require network access or battery power, except when you need to recharge.

      In fact, the only negative is that when you have say... 2000 yen on your card and you want to spend 4000 yen, you would have to go take out cash and charge the card first (which would defeat the point... except you avoid annoying coin change). If you are using mobile suica, you avoid the cash withdrawel and charge, but it takes maybe a minute to charge your phone, since you have to run the mobile suica app, log in, select charge, pick the amount, and wait about 30 seconds for it to authorize and charge. Still, you can do that while you are in line at the supermarket, and it's for SURE faster than going to the ATM.

      The positive side of the Suica method is... the payment itself is instant, requires no infrastructure, and is secure. (Basically a contactless smart-card). Since you only need the infrastructure to be available occasionally for charging/reconciliation/audits, it isn't really susceptable to many of the problems that the Paypal solution is.

      The only *bad* think about using Suica to pay is that a some places (mom & pop Ramen shops) don't take it still. I tend to avoid those places.

  16. Its not that bad but the line should repeat intext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  17. Why not challenge-response? by snookums · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A more interesting type of system would use a QR code challenge-response. A small screen on the gumball machine, or at the supermarket checkout flashes a QR code. You point your phone camera at it and details of the transaction come up on the screen. If you hit "confirm", your private key is used to sign the transaction and produce a response QR code which appears on your screen and is read back by the merchant.

    This way, your phone doesn't need to connect back to the payment gateway provider at all. This is an advantage if there is bad reception inside the store, or your provider is having a bad day, or your pre-paid plan ran out, or you only have an iPod and not a smart phone. Banks could probably even produce dedicated devices that performed only this function and provide them to customers.

    --
    Be careful. People in masks cannot be trusted.
    1. Re:Why not challenge-response? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I use this if I dont have a smartphone, only an iphone?

    2. Re:Why not challenge-response? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and then you get mugged, and your account is cleaned out.

  18. This gives me an idea for a T-shirt by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1

    "I just gave PayPal access to my bank account, and all I have to show for it is a stupid piece of gum*."

    Then, in small print:

    "* I chose to pay cash for this T-shirt."

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  19. Why is Twitter involved? by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why run this through Twitter? If the server wants to send an SMS message, it should just send an SMS message using an SMS gateway. Why package it as a "tweet?"

    (I suspect why. So they can spam you. It's illegal to send unsolicited commercial SMS messages in the US. If PayPal makes you "follow" them on Twitter to get transaction confirmations, they can then send you ads, too.)

    1. Re:Why is Twitter involved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My suspicion is more for the simple marketing value of the name Twitter being involved. The weight many companies and people give to Twitter is staggering - e.g., CNN broadcasting any fucking thing any idiot sends them on Twitter as though the twit speaks for an entire generation of people. If you don't have a good idea, add the name Twitter and suddenly it's a much better idea.

    2. Re:Why is Twitter involved? by saintm · · Score: 1

      Yup, that'd be my guess too.

      SMS is old hat Granddad, get with the new twitter/mash-up/facebook party. ;)

  20. Stay away ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... from the 'Prophylactics' brand machines. Their chewing gum tastes like rubber.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  21. Thumbprint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't lose it, can't be stolen, and just as hard to copy as your cellphone. Also everyone has one! Except for the MIB of course

    1. Re:Thumbprint by Dthief · · Score: 1
      Cant be stolen?

      Have you never seen a movie, or been passed out drunk while your friend makes a mold of your thumb?

      --
      www.RacquetUp.org - Helping Detroit Youth
  22. The possibilities for the technology... by thegarbz · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The possibilities end before they even start.

    I like many people here will avoid PayPal like the plague if I can. So let's take paypal, add the privacy issues of Twitter, and the insecurities of being able to deduct money without requiring a passcode that is immune to someone stealing my mobile phone. I think people who use this kind of payment system deserve whatever they get.

    Actually here's silently hoping that these are rolled out everywhere, a hacker gets access to a few accounts and rips people off for millions. Crossing my fingers that this puts paypal out of business.

  23. Already have this here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    We already have something similar here in Finland. We have some Cola vending machines that you call with your cellphone which in turn is some sort of service number that charges the amount for whatever drink you want onto your cellular bill. Really handy no cash needed. Although in comparison to the article this is somewhat different but almost the same. Things like this really take off here since _a lot_ of people here basically live a cash free life.

  24. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would 4chan do with this?

  25. We already have that technology! by Kagetsuki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While it's not linked to a paypal account we've had IC payment here in Japan for a very long time. I've been buying things from vending machines with my phone for maybe 6 years now and as far as I know I was a late adopter.

  26. Not Funny. Billed by Facial Expressions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MFW Naked Lady: 8->
    >>Smartphone billed for receiving entertainment.

    MFW Police Department LOLI-entrapment on street-corner: :-/
    >>Smartphone billed for not reporting Child Endangerment to Social Services.

    MFW George Carlin: 8D
    >>Smartphone billed for receiving Phylosophy degree.

    MFW Saturday Night Live: ;_;
    >>Smartphone not billed for entertainment, SNL billed for uppers-drugs assigned from Suicide Booth.

    MFW Goatse: ;-(
    >>Smartphone not billed, BATFE(ces) is on the Scene to seize your Smartphone for interacting with Terrorists.

  27. For your protection, by Compaqt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Paypal has withheld your gummy bear for 180 days. Because you accessed the gummy bear from a location other than your usual location, we will also hold your $.25 while our anti-fraud department investigates.

    To increase trust in the Paypal community, verify your account. To verify, fax a recent utility bill, send your debit card PIN and a half-chewn gummy bear as a DNA sample.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    1. Re:For your protection, by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The minimum PayPal fee is more than the cost of the gumball so the owner of the machine looses money with every one sold.

      The gumball would also have to be mailed to you with proof of delivery otherwise you could claim it never arrived. Any transaction where the receiver collects the item in person cannot safely be paid for with PayPal because the only evidence they accept as proof that the buyer has the item is a postal tracking number with signature on delivery. Even then the buyer could return it for being "not as described" and if you receive a turd in a box the only way to contest the item was not in the condition you sent it in is to report the matter to the police as fraud.

      In my city the police won't deal with anything to do with PayPal. I don't know if it's a national policy or just local.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:For your protection, by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Chewn"? Hm. It ALMOST sounds like a word. Other than that, I sympathize completely.

    3. Re:For your protection, by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Chewn"?? Hm. It ALMOST sounds like a word. But other than that, I know exactly what you mean.

    4. Re:For your protection, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "chewn"?

    5. Re:For your protection, by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Hehe, caught me. "chewn" is a word you'll find in the Urban Dictionary as opposed to Wiktionary.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  28. Why? by ForgedArtificer · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to avoid posting on my own story, but I think I do have to clarify a statement I made, from what I've seen here.

    Yes, you're all absolutely right that nobody really wants PayPal to be the ones in charge of this, first off. Never said we did.

    Beyond that, though... I think there's a serious point that everyone is missing, perhaps just because PayPal was what a lot of people focused on.

    People are mentioning credit cards, debit cards, EFTPOS... and yes, they are all capable of doing much of what this does already. Absolutely, a credit card could be used for this purpose if you wanted to buy a gumball with a credit card and someone was silly enough to set up a machine for that purpose.

    What can't be achieved with any of those is the ability to purchase anything, instantly.

    For example: let's say you're sitting in a doctor's waiting room, you pick up a book and read the first chapter. Then you have to go for your appointment. You want to finish the book - you think it's fantastic. So you scan the code on the book and instantly buy a copy and have it shipped to your house.

    Another example: you see an amazing movie in the theatre. On your way out, you scan a code and instantly preorder your DVD copy.

    Going further, you can tie other functions into the payment - scan a code at a restaurant, your table is reserved and you will receive an SMS when your table is ready. Scan a code, you've reserved the next game at a pool table, and now the next game is keyed to your phone and won't start without it. Reserve tickets to a concert, your phone directs you to your seat and the seat is locked upright until you scan in. Reserve plane tickets, same thing, and your phone also functions as your passport and flight documents.

    That's what I mean by the possibilities being endless. It allows for tying far more value to an EFT device, to the point where we will be able to buy nearly any standardized manufactured product the moment we see it without ever having to go to a store or find it on ebay.

    Scary? Oh yeah. I can't even begin to imagine my own spending habits - which are bad enough as it is - with the ability to instantly purchase anything I see. It's exciting too, though, and will add a whole new level... no, will completely redefine our economy and marketing. Advertisements become more valuable, as anyone can buy directly from them. Storefronts lose value... I'm not so keen on that, but on the other hand, it means that stores will have to find new ways to be unique, and not just cookie cutter big box stores... and it will probably lower prices across the board.

    I don't exactly hold an economics degree, but I'm still fascinated to see where this all leads.

    --
    The right to offend is central to the right to free speech.
    1. Re:Why? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I don't exactly hold an economics degree, but I'm still fascinated to see where this all leads.

      Sounds to me there's money to be made wearing QR-coded T-shirts around photogenic tourist sites.

      Photobombing for fun and profit!

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  29. Venue by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1

    PayPal Innovate conference was in San Jose, not San Diego.

    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns