Slashdot Mirror


George W. Bush Live From Facebook

tekgoblin writes "Facebook has just announced that George W. Bush is going to be present November 29th to answer questions about his new book, Decision Points. The discussion will happen on Facebook Live at 2PM PST."

8 of 372 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I hope it's moderated by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stuff he can be indicted for is already in the mainstream press. He admitted ordering water-boarding of detainees. Water-boarding is inhumane and a form of torture. If the US recognised the authority of the ICC, he'd be in the Hague, not giving Q&A's.

    Yes, I do know I've just paraphrased my sig.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  2. Re:I hope it's moderated by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even without recognizing the authority of the ICC, the US has punished users of waterboarding (both Americans and captured foreign opponents) independently, and some of the legal precedent on the subject actually comes from crackdowns on certain rather dodgy police forces which had stumbled upon this most excellent method of closing cases...

    Furthermore Ronald Reagan, practically a saint among the right, was the one who pushed for the US ratification of the UN convention against torture, saying:

    "The United States participated actively and effectively in the negotiation of the Convention . It marks a significant step in the development during this century of international measures against torture and other inhuman treatment or punishment. Ratification of the Convention by the United States will clearly express United States opposition to torture, an abhorrent practice unfortunately still prevalent in the world today. The core provisions of the Convention establish a regime for international cooperation in the criminal prosecution of torturers relying on so-called 'universal jurisdiction.' Each State Party is required either to prosecute torturers who are found in its territory or to extradite them to other countries for prosecution."

    Even if we have not the slightest interest in giving the ICC the time of day, we have a legal obligation to prosecute torturers we find on our soil, and in some cases to extradite them to the jurisdictions where their crimes took place, assuming extradition agreements are in place.

    We can only assume that Ronald Reagan was actually a soft-on-terror deep-cover liberal...

  3. Re:I hope it's moderated by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny, waterboarding is the only form of "torture" that Marines do to each other on weekends for fun. Not even remotely kidding. I was in the Marines, and I have friends who waterboard each other for fun.

    There are people who eat broken glass, inject their cocks with cocaine and headbutt iron posts for fun, that doesn't mean it is a legitimate treatment for political prisoners.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  4. Re:I hope it's moderated by Jawnn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny, waterboarding is the only form of "torture" that Marines do to each other on weekends for fun. Not even remotely kidding. I was in the Marines, and I have friends who waterboard each other for fun.

    I don't know which is more pathetic; your friends' idea of fun, or your complete lack of understanding of what torture really is all about. As others have observed, anything your friends do to you utterly lacks the requisite psychological dynamic that truly qualifies something as torture.

  5. We're supposed to be better than that. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've read Musashi, Sun Tzu, and Machiavelli. All of them claim that the end justifies the means. However, we claim as Americans to be better than that. We claim to believe in that every human being possesses certain inalienable rights by virtue of his humanity. We cannot espouse such an ideal while also claiming that in war the end justifies the means. The two are contradictory.

  6. Re:I hope it's moderated by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are you one of those who have managed to ignore the steady stream of FBI and other professional interrogators who claim that torture is, at best, no more effective that conventional techniques and, at worst, actually directly counterproductive, along with causing you to stoop to your enemy's level?

  7. Re:Cue Bush Derangement Syndrome by icebraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, it's odd how people feel strongly when someone starts a war which hundreds of thousands of people. What's up with that?

    I mean, I don't especially appreciate any of your last presidents, Obama included, but G.W.B. was more than simply a bad president.

  8. Re:Cue Bush Derangement Syndrome by machinder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Then you're not paying attention. Threats on the president's life have skyrocketed since Obama took office. Right wing politicians fantasize about "second amendment remedies." There was a national day of prayer for his death.

    You're wilfully remaining ignorant if you truly believe that there was more venom directed agains Bush than against Obama.

    I know that Americans tend not to care what the rest of the world thinks about your country, but most of us think your tea partiers are nuts. Here's this wishy-washy, do-little centrist president, and you lot are going on and on about his socialist communist tyranny? And you invite open racists from European nationalist organisations to speak, but then claim the Tea Party isn't racist. Your infrastructure is crumbling because no one has the political will to use tax dollars to fix it, but you're Taxed Enough Already? We all think you're nuts.