Slashdot Mirror


8-Year-Old Receives Patent

Knile writes "While not the youngest patent recipient ever (that would be a four year old in Texas), Bryce Gunderman has received a patent at age 8 for a space-saver that combines an outlet cover plate with a shelf. From the article: '"I thought how I was going to make a lot of money," Bryce said about what raced through his brain when he received the patent.'"

142 comments

  1. Considering how long it takes to get a patent... by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Considering how long it takes to get a patent, he must have been in diapers when he submitted it. Kudos to him.

    And the invention is a good idea too. My cell usually rests on the kitchen floor while it charges.

  2. so sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Something about this story just makes me want to cry soo hard. Faith in humanity lost yet again..

    1. Re:so sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Insightful

    2. Re:so sad by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      What made you sad? That an eight year old had a very good idea? It may not have been original to the world, but it was original to him. I, for one, see a future engineer. Nothing about that makes me sad.

      Go troll elsewhere.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:so sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article: '"I thought how I was going to make a lot of money," Bryce said about what raced through his brain when he received the patent.'"

      I do not see a future engineer, all I see is a future shell of a man cranking out useless commercial crap. There is no engineer here just another money grubbing human being that has no interest in the advancement of society but only the advancement of their own pockets. It pains me to see such vile behaver in someone as young as this.

    4. Re:so sad by MyLongNickName · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Oh, please. Get over yourself.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:so sad by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was my first thought too. We see cartoons where talking animals kick over a rock and it's a lump of gold and "GUH GUH GUH GUH GUH GUH GUH GUH GUHGUHGUHGUHGUH O_O" ... I don't even do that when a hot 18 year old girl sits in my lap. I mean I make a grab for the hips and keep her close but hey. I certainly don't get an unmitigatable hard-on over a couple tens of thousands of dollars in front of me; my first thought is, "What's the catch?" (the catch is you have to market this shit, and you're minimally likely to change our cultural view of what outlets look like; this is a gimmick.)

      A better man would have thought about the practical purpose of such an invention. A thinking man. A man who is going to invent something even better.

    6. Re:so sad by windcask · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Advancement of society" is completely subjective. Maybe somebody someday will spend the time he normally used picking up his charging cell phone off the floor coming up with an idea for curing cancer. I'm just happy the kid has a bright future ahead of him.

      There was a time where insulting a child was off limits (particularly one you know nothing about), but I know that's long in the past...

    7. Re:so sad by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What made you sad?

      It makes me sad too. Here's an 8-year-old kid who is already turned into a money-grubbing materialist by his parents. The quest for money is the most empty and fruitless thing in life but our society idolizes it beyond everything else. He should be out playing with his friends and teasing girls and enjoying his youth instead of writing patent applications and worrying about how much money he's going to make and what useless crap he's going to buy with it. Not only that but he's going to take his money and feed it straight into the pockets of overpaid professional sports players, who certainly don't need it. I don't blame the kid because he's probably just emulating his patent-lawyer dad, but it would be nice if our society was less focused on money and material possessions and more on things that actually matter. Maybe the kid will turn out alright, but I don't hold much hope.

    8. Re:so sad by kheldan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IN THIS COMMENT: Butthurt Anonymous Coward cries and whines over the fact that someone of single-digit age came up with a simple yet innovative idea that might just put him through college one day, while the AC OP sits lonely and fat in his stepmother's basement, unable to even hold down a job at the local Burger King.
      Stop being such a fucking whiner, AC. Go back to community college and actually learn some job skills (Protip: XBAWKS360 doesn't count as "job skills") and maybe you'll actually get a job someday.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    9. Re:so sad by windcask · · Score: 1

      The quest for money is the most empty and fruitless thing in life but our society idolizes it beyond everything else.

      You say that as though it's fact. People are achievement-driven, not money driven. Money is just part of the equation of a successful life. I'd say getting a patent when you're eight is a good first step towards success. I don't know about you, but where I grew up the kids who were at the top of my class were more often than not the best athletes (and the richest, too). If I were a betting man, I'd say that kid's probably spending more time with his friends and enjoying his childhood than you think. His dad's just trying to take give him a head start in life; I see no fault in that.

    10. Re:so sad by gstoddart · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There is no engineer here just another money grubbing human being that has no interest in the advancement of society but only the advancement of their own pockets. It pains me to see such vile behaver in someone as young as this.

      Seriously, it can be two things.

      You can make the world a better place, and get some for your own stack.

      Altruism is all well and good, but the profit motive is perfectly reasonable as well. Maybe some of the truly Open Source die-hards think we should all live in communes and evolve beyond the need for money like in Star Trek ... in the meantime, I still expect to get paid.

      However, having said that, he's the son of a patent lawyer ... he will almost never do anything for the good of society without considering the paycheck. Then again, neither will most people.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    11. Re:so sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may not have been original to the world, but it was original to him.

      If that's so, then he shouldn't have gotten a patent on it.

    12. Re:so sad by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      The quest for money is the most empty and fruitless thing in life but our society idolizes it beyond everything else.

      You say that as though it's fact. People are achievement-driven, not money driven. Money is just part of the equation of a successful life. I'd say getting a patent when you're eight is a good first step towards success. I don't know about you, but where I grew up the kids who were at the top of my class were more often than not the best athletes (and the richest, too). If I were a betting man, I'd say that kid's probably spending more time with his friends and enjoying his childhood than you think. His dad's just trying to take give him a head start in life; I see no fault in that.

      All true, except you ignore GP's comment entirely. Remember, it's not money itself that is the "root of much evil", but the love of money. This child exhibited that love. Instead of replying "I thought it was neat" or "I thought up a new invention", he said he was all about the muhnee.

    13. Re:so sad by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      And how do you know this kid doesn't do that? Does the paragraph Slashdot summary give you that keen insight into his life. Again... get over yourself.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    14. Re:so sad by EL_mal0 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      An eight year old, on the other hand, thinks about the cool hockey equipment and tickets he could get with even a modest sum. To an eight year old, hundreds of dollars is a lot of money, and the tens of thousands that you pass off as no big deal is a fortune.

    15. Re:so sad by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      My first thought was "Oh look, someone learning that the patent system only works for the Big Boys". If he thinks his riches aren't coming fast enough now, just wait until the market is flooded with cheap Chinese-made ripoffs.

      That said, it looks like a fairly good idea if it's made with the right materials (hard plastic+"rubberized" coating to protect shins). Shame I didn't think of it first.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    16. Re:so sad by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      When you're raised in a society that indirectly praises the greedy and corrupt, what do you expect? He was shaped by his environment, if he was shaped at all.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    17. Re:so sad by HaZardman27 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It pains me to see an adult (I'm assuming) get so butt-hurt about an 8 year-old succeeding that they'll whine this much about so-called "vile behavior." He didn't come up with this design to save the freaking world, he recognized his father's problem and then realized he could make money for solving it. Do you go to work every day for free?

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    18. Re:so sad by ffreeloader · · Score: 2

      Oh, for Pete's sake. Think about this for a minute.

      Money has never been my first priority in life. My brother? It's always been his first priority in life and I despise the guy as he's an insufferable prick and as cruel a human being as I know of because of money being his first priority. He's so tight he squeaks when he walks, and doing something for someone else is always at the very bottom of his list of priorities. My old man was a prick too, but at least he helped other people when he had the money, and my brother hated him for helping others.

      That being said, if I had received a patent on an invention of mine, my first response wouldn't have been another invention, but how I could put the proceeds coming from this invention to work for me. You know, pay off bills, investments I could make so the money would work for me, buy some land, etc.... If the rewards were big enough to do more than that I'd think about what I could do for others with it but I have needs too and if I don't consider my own needs first I'll never really help anyone else because I'm not being responsible.. But, condemning an 8 year old kid for having dreams of things that 8 year old's like is just stupid and mean-spirited, as you're condemning a child for not being mature.

      Also, the question asked, and the answer given, could very well not be what the kid does with his money. All he did was answer the question posed to him, and he already may have changed his mind. He isn't going to get an immediate return on his money, and it sounds as if his parents are responsible people. He will have a chance to rethink his priorities before he gets any money back on his invention, and the experience of having to deal with delayed gratification may well teach him something. Even if he does buy a few hundred dollars worth of sports equipment what's that to the possible income from his invention? Probably only a very small part, and I'll bet you that you've spent more on entertainment in your lifetime than this kid has stated would be his first purchases. Plus, you're much older than he is, so what's your excuse for blowing money on entertainment?

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    19. Re:so sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way I see it, he's an 8 year old trying to fund his hobbies with his work, just like the majority of people I know. He's not trying to make money to be evil... he's trying to make money to buy hockey equipment. You might as well bitch about a 16 year old who gets a summer job to save up for a car... or a mid-career IT worker who moonlights to pay off their house before retirement. Damn them all for wanting money.

      The fact that he filed a patent does not define who he will be as an adult. Stop speculating that he will turn out to be a scumbag just because you don't agree with his motives.

    20. Re:so sad by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      He didn't come up with this design to save the freaking world, he recognized his father's problem

      I had the same problem and solved it with much less fan-fare. I just set the phone atop the charger, like this.

      Do I get a patent?

      and then realized he could make money for solving it

      No, he realised he could make money by preventing anyone else from solving it in the same way that he thought of. Now if they want to use a little shelf, they have to buy it from him.

      At least my solution doesn’t infringe on his patent, so he can’t sue me...

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    21. Re:so sad by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

      His father founded a patent law firm. If there's any sort of vicious greed in this story, it lies with the father. How many 8 year-olds even understand patents?

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    22. Re:so sad by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      If there's any sort of vicious greed in this story, it lies with the father. How many 8 year-olds even understand patents?

      Oh, I agree. It’s rather atrocious that he’s already seeing moneybags, but I’d blame his dad before I blamed him.

      Also, 8-year-olds are smarter than you perhaps realise... plenty intelligent enough, at least, to be taught that own patents = get rich = buy lots of stuff.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    23. Re:so sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have anything like that I just steal WiFi from a laptop someone threw away cause they didn't know how to fix it. I am fine keeping my spirit clean of monetary filth.

    24. Re:so sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money has never been my first priority in life. – by ffreeloader (1105115)

      Obviously not, if you expect everybody else to pay your way, ffreeloader.

    25. Re:so sad by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

      I don't doubt the intelligence of an 8 year-old, I'm more in doubt of the average 8 year-old's understanding of business shenanigans. When I was that age, I simply had no concern for anything like that, though to be honest that hasn't changed much.

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    26. Re:so sad by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I bet he doesn't make any money.

      Delusions aside, even (ESPECIALLY) an 8 year old shouldn't suddenly see dollars and gold pieces spinning around his head the moment he achieves something. Achievements are first personal, then monetary. Money isn't a human factor, no matter how much you want to think it's "human" to want wealth; the human factor is to be proud of your work, not to see everything as potential cash (which doesn't really equate to wealth).

    27. Re:so sad by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

      LOL. You're a funny guy, and I appreciate humor.

      But, I should think that when you start using the irony of me using a Red Skelton character-inspired username you should look first at the yellow stripe running down your back starting at your forehead and ending at your butt, as clearly exists from your choice of the username coward, and not only that, but an anonymous coward on top of that.... ;)

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    28. Re:so sad by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

      Very good. You just want to use the fruits of everyone else's monetary filth. Wow. What a strong level of integrity and strict adherence to your philosophy of life. You're a paragon of virtue, without a doubt. I'm really impressed....

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    29. Re:so sad by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      Oh, for Pete's sake. Think about this for a minute.

      Money has never been my first priority in life. My brother? It's always been his first priority in life ...

      My brother lost his first tooth to an accident. He fell down stairs and knocked it out. This was long before it would have fallen out naturally (maybe age four?) He went through the usual ritual of putting it under his pillow and the Tooth Fairy left him some money for it just as she had done for me when I lost teeth.
      Our mom came upon him the next day hitting himself in the face with a wooden block trying to break his other teeth out for more money. This sort of approach would never have occurred to me.
      Fortunately, he's not an insufferable prick, just a really (self-destructively at times) hard worker.

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    30. Re:so sad by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

      I bet he doesn't make any money.

      You may be correct, but he does have a dad that knows how to create wealth from ideas. It's his profession, he's good enough at it to have his own business, and that raises the odds for his son to make money from his idea by a significant amount. An 8 year old without a father who understands how to monetize patents has a far greater chance of failing to make money. I'd say this kid has odds in his favor that he'll make money that are many times greater than the average kid.

      I've known a few people who invented things and they didn't create the invention with money in mind. However, when it became clear that the invention would have a substantial monetary reward they didn't ignore that fact nor fail to plan how they would/could spend the money. Every one of them had plans to spend a part of that windfall on something they wanted, not needed. That a kid would think of fulfilling his dreams of getting sporting goods so he could play his favorite sport/s is just as proper for his age as is an adult looking to use some of the money to fulfill their dreams.

      It looks to me as if the kid hasn't been given everything he wants, you know, spoiled. If he was, he would already have that gear as his parents aren't poor.

      Your assumption that this kid created his invention with only money in mind is quite a stretch. I'd say it's a pretty arrogant assumption too, as neither the kid, nor anyone else, has said what his motivation was other than his dad complaining about the mess of wiring on the counter. Maybe his whole motivation was to fulfill a need his dad had talked about. I don't know what it was, and neither do you. I'm just willing to give the kid a break and you're willing to attack his character with no evidence to support your position.

      The kid talking about what he wants to do the money is not the same thing as his motivation for the idea itself. Liking the monetary fruits of an idea, and the motivation for the idea are not the same thing. Saying they must be the same is a logical fallacy.

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    31. Re:so sad by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The kid talking about what he wants to do the money is not the same thing as his motivation for the idea itself.

      Buying hockey equipment is not what I'm talking about. The quote given was, "I thought how I was going to make a lot of money." Then the question was raised about what to do with the money. His personal achievement was, "I am gonna be rich!" Not "Wow I invented something, and here is the patent!"

    32. Re:so sad by windcask · · Score: 1

      Remember, it's not money itself that is the "root of much evil", but the love of money. This child exhibited that love.

      And I'm sure that when I was eight, I would have traded my parents away for a Super Nintendo. Kids tend to be superficial and don't have the self-reflective capabilities that adults have; you have no idea how this child will turn out based on scrutiny of one sentence he said when he was a pre-pubescent child. So what's your point?

    33. Re:so sad by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

      Why should he mention the patent? The context of the entire article and interview was in the context of his already having been granted a patent. The interviewer obviously knew about it, so why would the kid think of showing off the patent itself to the interviewer unless the interviewer asked to see it? They did show the interviewer the product as there was a picture of it with the article.

      Also, what's with your reading your thoughts into his statement. And, his statement was actually, wow, I'm going to make a lot of money, not I"m going to be rich. What's a "lot of money" to an 8 year old? Is it anything like what you consider to be a "lot of money"? I doubt it.

      With the kid being very aware of what his dad does for a living, and the school class on inventors he's taken, it's not an unexpected logical leap for him to think he will make money too. He most likely hears how inventors make money on their inventions on a daily basis. Unless he's completely stupid he's going to associate that same reward with his invention.

      I can't think of a single adult I've ever known who wouldn't have been excited about making a lot of money. That includes some very spiritual people whose goals and life weren't wrapped up in materialism. I'd be pretty excited about a windfall too, and I've never made money my #1 priority.

      In fact, I've been mocked, and my parents and siblings have always thought there was something wrong with me, because I have quite a few priorities above making money or becoming rich. Doesn't mean I wouldn't get excited over a windfall if it came my way, but it's not anywhere near my first priority in life. I've given the last $20 I had to my name to someone I thought needed it more than I did, and I've done it more than once. I've also come close to getting fired a few times because I knew the cost of the repair for the retired person's furnace/AC/appliance I was working on couldn't afford me or the parts I installed. Instead of coming back from what should have been a $300 service call I came back with $50 or so out of my own pocket and the owner wasn't pleased.

      So, because I would get excited about a windfall and think about what I could get with it, does that cause you to assume I'm a materialistic money grubber too, as that's your assumption about this kid?

      Last but not least, just how introspective are most kids? Do they think deeply about their own motives? Do most of them even understand their own motives? Do kids often answer in a way that they think someone wants to hear? Have they thought out their own value system by age 8?

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    34. Re:so sad by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The quest for money is the most empty and fruitless thing in life

      So, providing for your old age, so that you won't be a burden on your family, neghbors, and country, bleeding them to their deaths, that is the most empty and fruitless thing in life? How shallow. Money is the reward for production, and used for buying the productive effort of others. The earlier a person learns to be productive, and the more productive he is, the better a person he is (other things being equal).

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    35. Re:so sad by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Any activity is evil if you can accomplish the same thing by killing yourself.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    36. Re:so sad by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Get over yourself.
      Get over yourself.
      Get over yourself.
      You're like a broken record...

    37. Re:so sad by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      The earlier a person learns to be productive, and the more productive he is, the better a person he is

      Spoken like a perfect little drone. A+!

    38. Re:so sad by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Kids tend to be superficial

      And where do you think they learn this? The parents, and our society.

    39. Re:so sad by windcask · · Score: 1

      On the contrary. Kids are born that way. They want what they want, and they want it now. Parents and society stay that way because they never grow up.

    40. Re:so sad by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Get over yourself.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  3. wtf by richy+freeway · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These things have been available for years. Also the link to the patent is wrong.

    1. Re:wtf by Arancaytar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      These things have been available for years.

      When has that ever stopped a patent?

    2. Re:wtf by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Too true.

    3. Re:wtf by airfoobar · · Score: 1

      Not only is he the youngest patent recipient, he'll also become the youngest patent troll! Hooray for the system.

    4. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      But he's just an 8-year-old boy! Probably lives below the poverty line! Give the dog his day.
      </troll>

    5. Re:wtf by snookerhog · · Score: 1
      Indeed. I've seen one of these in my kitchen for years.

      Perhaps the whole idea is just that no jury would convict an 8 year old?

    6. Re:wtf by Palidase · · Score: 2, Informative

      He isn't the youngest patent recipient. The youngest was a 4 year old who created a device for grasping round knobs on doors and cabinets, intended for peopel with physical disabilities.

    7. Re:wtf by mysidia · · Score: 1

      These things have been available for years.

      Hence the need for the patent. To prevent copycats, or litigate / force them into paying royalties if there are already copycats.

    8. Re:wtf by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Whee... didn't even RTFS, eh? The youngest patent recipient is a 4-year old in Texas.

    9. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      On Power Shelf's site they have a video stating she thought of it in April 2008. They apparently filed for patents at some point, but in the article referenced the boy invented it in 2007, and assumedly filed a patent quickly (dad is attorney).

      So it may not be prior - IANAL but I assume whoever files first is the winner

    10. Re:wtf by Java+Pimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only the first link is similar to the kid's "invention" because it is the only one that is a replacement wall plate. The kid did improve on the invention by placing the shelf "above" the outlets instead of below so you can actually stack things on the shelf without blocking the outlets. Of course IANAPL but the kid's idea is probably sufficiently different from the first link that neither infringe on each other's "IP". I mean he didn't patent "wall plate shelves" (overly broad) but only his "design" of the wall plate shelf (specific)...

      Pretty good for an 8-year old if you ask me...

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    11. Re:wtf by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Only the first link is similar to the kid's "invention" because it is the only one that is a replacement wall plate. The kid did improve on the invention by placing the shelf "above" the outlets instead of below so you can actually stack things on the shelf without blocking the outlets. Of course IANAPL but the kid's idea is probably sufficiently different from the first link that neither infringe on each other's "IP". I mean he didn't patent "wall plate shelves" (overly broad) but only his "design" of the wall plate shelf (specific)...

      Last I checked, most outlets were pretty symmetrical, so that "below the plug" shelf can be turned 180 degrees around and made into an "above the plug" shelf. It may not look nice (if it was designed to below the plug), but anyone with a screwdriver could trivially turn it around if twas that useful.

      Hell, there's enough bad handymen out there that at least several people would've installed it upside down. Other than looking funny, they probably don't know better.

      No, there's got to be more to this patent than simply turning it around...

    12. Re:wtf by neowolf · · Score: 1

      I guess the Patent Office still doesn't know about Google. Lots of prior art, existing products, and I've made a couple of tiny shelves above my own outlets as far back as ten years ago.

    13. Re:wtf by AltairDusk · · Score: 1

      First thing I thought of when I saw the picture. I've seen these for sale many times, often the shelf was positioned below the outlet but I find it hard to believe changing the shelf location warrants a patent.

    14. Re:wtf by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, most outlets were pretty symmetrical, so that "below the plug" shelf can be turned 180 degrees around and made into an "above the plug" shelf.

      Do you not have grounded plugs where you live?

      Around here, most plugs are three-prong. And, even most of the newer two-prong plugs have a wider blade on one side which will only go into the socket one way to provide some grounding.

      In my house, if it's intended to go into the plug one way, it's *only* going to fit in one way. There is not 180 degree rotational symmetry for most things.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    15. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sound like he has in-house council, his dad is patent lawyer. He'll make lot of money in suing the prior competition because his lawyer expenses are lower.

    16. Re:wtf by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2

      unless you're in England, "Outlet Cover" is not synonymous with "Outlet Plug"

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    17. Re:wtf by Java+Pimp · · Score: 1

      But wait... I'm confused... Aren't we at slashdot supposed to be upset because the patent system doesn't enable people to innovate on existing inventions... They are so broad that no one can solve the same problem in different ways...

      Now we're upset that this kid did get to improve on an existing invention? I'd be willing to bet you could get a patent on a wall plate shelf with the shelves off to the side of the outlets. Unless this post now constitutes prior art...

      I would argue it should be as simple as turning it upside down. If that wasn't listed in the claims of the original invention, shouldn't it be fair game for anyone else?

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    18. Re:wtf by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      unless you're in England, "Outlet Cover" is not synonymous with "Outlet Plug"

      Fair enough, I wasn't thinking in terms of the actual faceplate.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    19. Re:wtf by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      Patents are invariant over Euclidian similarity transformations of translation, rotation and scaling. Meaning you can't patent "the same thing but bigger" or "rotated 180 degrees." At least you shouldn't be able to.

    20. Re:wtf by kimvette · · Score: 1

      The wall cover will fit either way as single and double gang NEMA 1 and NEMA 5 outlets are symmetrical externally.

      Besides, even if they were not symmetrical would be a trivial matter to install an outlet fixture upside down.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    21. Re:wtf by serbanp · · Score: 1

      Pretty good for an 8-year old if you ask me...

      Come on! is this innovative enough (not obvious to a person skilled in the art etc) to merit a patent? I think not. Just because a patent lawyer thought it's neat to have his kid's name on a shiny plate there is no reason to actually do it.

      The USPTO has a severe case of diarrhea, approving so many useless and, very often, frivolous patents (there are 200,000 granted each year). There is no need to further inflate the statistics with this crap.

    22. Re:wtf by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Besides, even if they were not symmetrical would be a trivial matter to install an outlet fixture upside down.

      See, now there you go sounding like an engineer or something.

      True story -- some friends and I went out for lunch, and when one guys sandwich arrives, the bottom bread was torn and the sandwich would have fallen apart/made a mess.

      The solution, of course, was to invert the sandwich so the structurally sound piece of bread was on the bottom. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    23. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Patently wrong?

    24. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't remember where, but I just saw an inductive charger that just plugs into the wall and the device sits on it and leans against the wall.

    25. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something like this...

      http://www.homedepot.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10051&productId=202203571

      This is an idea that does not seem to support a patent...?

  4. to bad billy mays is not around to sell this! by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    to bad billy mays is not around to sell this!

    1. Re:to bad billy mays is not around to sell this! by assemblerex · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shouldn't that be in all caps?

    2. Re:to bad billy mays is not around to sell this! by Java+Pimp · · Score: 1

      See now that is funny!! somebody mod this up please!

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    3. Re:to bad billy mays is not around to sell this! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      to bad billy mays is not around to sell this!

      There's always the Shamwow guy. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  5. Great! by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    Now you can take an 8 year old to court.

    1. Re:Great! by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      Now you can take an 8 year old to court.

      Don't you mean, now an 8 year old can take YOU to court?

    2. Re:Great! by sconeu · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, that's just in Soviet Russia

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  6. What's in a number? by geegel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The age seems pretty irrelevant. He actually invented an useful contraption, which he intends to produce and sell. This is actually a patent working as it should.

    --
    right...
    1. Re:What's in a number? by geegel · · Score: 1

      Whoops, just saw the posts containing prior art. That kinda throws a wrench into my whole argument.

      --
      right...
    2. Re:What's in a number? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's funny to me is that an 8-year-old achieved more than most Slashdotters of all ages have.

    3. Re:What's in a number? by Metrathon · · Score: 1

      Getting a patent on something you can already order from amazon?

    4. Re:What's in a number? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when your father works in the patent lawyer industry?

    5. Re:What's in a number? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      How do you know that he didn't file for the patent before you could order similar on Amazon?

      And assuming this eight year old really invented it himself and was unaware of any other similar devices, I think it is damn impressive anyhow.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    6. Re:What's in a number? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      It doesn't seem like this took any serious R&D, and that this would be something that was more or less a Eureka moment, and then a small amount of time figuring out the specifics for how to do implement it. Piano prodigies and the like are more impressive IMO.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    7. Re:What's in a number? by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      ORLY?

      Well, I invented this:

      http://ompldr.org/vNmQ5ZA/bilde.jpg

      I doubt it’s patentable, though. It makes too much sense and you don’t need a silly shelf.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    8. Re:What's in a number? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      So he has to compare with Piano prodigies? I think I agree more and more with the OP's assessment of this kid versus the average Slashdotter.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    9. Re:What's in a number? by Whatsisname · · Score: 1

      This is actually not at all how patents are supposed to work. Patents were designed to encourage inventors to disclose the secrets of the invention. There is hardly any tricky engineering that went into this.

    10. Re:What's in a number? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      As far as amazing kids go, that's more or less the standard, and even that's sort of played out. It's cool that he came up with it, but it's hardly newsworthy, at least not beyond a 5 minute spot on the local news or an article in a local newspaper. The big news is that he got a patent at such a young age, and that was because his dad's apparently a patent attorney, not because he's a masterful engineer.

      One could even reasonably argue that giving him a patent is the wrong way to do things. It's conditioning him to see his conceptions primarily as ways to get money, and that mindset can squash the creativity that allows a young kid to see solutions to problems in the first place.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    11. Re:What's in a number? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Boy is Slashdot filled with a lot of jaded people...

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    12. Re:What's in a number? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Because we don't all adulate a small child for figuring out something one could reasonably expect a small child to figure out? It's a shelf, and this kid figured out a moderately creative way of hanging it. I'd probably be proud of him if I knew him, but I wouldn't expect people who didn't to really care.

      Incidentally, it seems that a misleading angle on the photograph misled me into thinking it was something a big more creative than it actually was. I was thinking that it was am outlet plug cover (like the ones that protect babies from shocking themselves) that doubled as a shelf. You lose a plug in the process, but it can be moved without having to take the outlet cover off, which is behavior that hotels generally frown upon.

      image of the basic idea is here: http://yfrog.com/emlolinventionp

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  7. Pass Code by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would this pass U.S. electrical codes? I am not an electrician, but wonder if the hazard of weight busting the cover would present a problem.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Pass Code by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Unless you're still using a cell phone from the 80's, I don't think weight is going to be much of an issue.

    2. Re:Pass Code by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      But you will find that electrical codes anticipate misuse and are often overspec'd. I just wonder if this is one of those cases.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:Pass Code by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or imagine that because there is a shelf protruding that it is much more likely that someone kicks it, something falls on it, or something else unexpected suddenly puts tremendous torque on the plate.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    4. Re:Pass Code by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      Probably not much of a hazard with MOST receptacles, where the box was anchored to a wall stud during initial construction. But when an electrician installs additional receptacles AFTER the sheetrock is in place, most of the time they will use an "old work" or "cut-in" box, which is essentially clamped onto the sheetrock itself. Sheetrock has very little structural value.

      The shelf on the top could act like a really nice lever to bust the box loose from the wall if some idiot puts too much weight on it.

      If this kid is planning to sell these, I hope he has some serious product liability coverage when the inevitable accident occurs.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    5. Re:Pass Code by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      I suspect the shelf will just bend and break. The outlets are usually very sturdy (obnoxiously so) and usually attached to a stud. The shelf is weak, in comparison.

    6. Re:Pass Code by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      If this kid is planning to sell these, I hope he has some serious product liability coverage when the inevitable accident occurs.

      This is the problem with 8 year olds running businesses. Instead of thinking about these issues, he thinks "Now how can I sell these so I can buy a hockey puck?" Actually I take that back; most businesses don't have the foresight to realize these issues. He'll make a fine capitalist!

    7. Re:Pass Code by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Apparently you have never worked on an old house. Often, you will find outlets attached to the lath(sp?) board.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    8. Re:Pass Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this kid is planning to sell these, I hope he has some serious product liability coverage when the inevitable accident occurs.

      Excuse me, I need to go patent a new business model.

    9. Re:Pass Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true, unless they're retrofit outlets, in which case they are attached to the drywall and are UL/NEC approved and therefore the device must anticipate such usage.

      That being said, standard UL approved outlet covers are made out of very brittle plastic and will break if you just overtorque the screw, nevermind put load on them, so I expect UL isn't all that picky on these things.

    10. Re:Pass Code by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'd put the onus the other way: if you're such an idiot that you put that much weight on a shelf designed to hold a cellphone charger, your busted sheetrock is not my problem.

      Seriously, there comes a point where the consumer has to exercise common sense. You can't expect the manufacturer to exercise sense for you for every little thing. If it weren't for personal injury lawyers (and the extremity of that issue is documented by the absurd "do not whatever idiotic thing no sensible person would even think of doing" disclaimers found on so much merchandise today), maybe it would still be a two-way relationship and not always the mfgr's fault, no matter how stupid the user is.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:Pass Code by v1 · · Score: 1

      I think clipping a plugged in wall wart is going to be more destructive, that has potential to damage the actual outlet itself. if the coverplate is removed it's just a bit of broken plastic that doesn't require an electrician to replace

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    12. Re:Pass Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or uses it to hold their drink and potentially cause a house fire.

    13. Re:Pass Code by Dilaudid · · Score: 1

      Yes. Or if you poured mercury on yourself while using it, you might electrocute yourself.

  8. Corrupt legal system. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Convict?!? What would happen is that the kid's father, probably the one who really "invented" this, would sue and then settle out of court for tens of thousands of dollars. Rinse - repeat. Considering how expensive it is for us hoi polloi to defend ourselves in court, the kid's father will clean up with out of court settlements.

    Let's face it, our legal system is corrupt. He who has the most money, or free legal advice, wins!

    1. Re:Corrupt legal system. by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Be still my beating heart - "hoi polloi" spelled - and used - correctly(!!) - by an AC - on Slashdot! Perhaps there's hope for our education system after all ..... Naaaahhh.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Corrupt legal system. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He most likely attended a private school. I attended a parochial school system for 12 years, and after a decade of heavy drug abuse with no usage of, or refreshing of, my high school English skills, I was still in the 95th percentile in English skills when I thought about going to college. That tells me the public school system in this country very lousy.

    3. Re:Corrupt legal system. by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      I attended a parochial school system for 12 years, and after a decade of heavy drug abuse with no usage of, or refreshing of, my high school English skills, I was still in the 95th percentile in English skills when I thought about going to college. That tells me the public school system in this country very lousy.

      Damn. You had me up until that last bit.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  9. Patents Can Be Easy by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    The market segment, sales and production can be the most difficult.

    Good thing he has supportive parents in more ways than one.

    Maybe this will set Bryce off on a lifelong career?

  10. Re:Considering how long it takes to get a patent.. by Unkyjar · · Score: 4, Informative

    He was 6 when the patent applied for. I guess it also helps that his father is a lawyer that founded a law firm actually named Patent Technologies LLC.

  11. Father Helped A LOT by TidMiste · · Score: 1

    If you read the articles, you'll see that his father is actually the founder of a patent law firm. An 8 year old gets a patent extremely fast as compared to the years many corporations wait for just as legitimate patents, and no one sees that maybe his father pulled a TON of strings for it? In the real world, he would wait as long, if not longer, for that patent to roll through the patent office as a major corporation would have to wait. His father is teaching him about patents the wrong way. Sure, the kid has some success coming for him, but when he's older, he'll learn the hard way that it is NEVER that easy.

  12. I call shenanigans by damn_registrars · · Score: 0

    Not on the 8-year-old and their patent, but on the patent mentioned that was issued to the 4-year-old. You don't really expect us to believe that a patent was issued to someone in Texas for an invention that had nothing to do with killing people, do you?

    Sheesh, I wasn't born yesterday.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:I call shenanigans by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Ah, you are wrong. You see the "device to aid elderly to turn door knobs" was designed to help her great-grandma get into the shotgun closet. that way if the pistol on the counter isn't the right tool for the job, granny has options.

      I am glad I could clear that up for you.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:I call shenanigans by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      designed to help her great-grandma get into the shotgun closet

      Guns can be kept in closets? That in and of itself would likely be news in Texas.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    3. Re:I call shenanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      up here in new england we prefer to keep them in the back pockets of crack dealers and stick-up kids.

  13. Fire code violation by srussia · · Score: 1

    I hope he earns enough to cover the class-action suit after someone trips on this thing and starts an electrical fire.

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
  14. Dangerous by samjam · · Score: 3, Informative

    I saw one of these demo'd a while back on Dragons Den as the "inventor" tried to get funding.

    The dragon nearly showed that while it looks like a shelf, it's really a lever for exposing high voltage electrical wiring.

    So we appreciate the idea behind it, but it's so obviously got dangerous and potentially operational modes that can occur in normal (not intended) use.

    Better to tie your phone to a piece of string and tie the string to the charger - then if anyone yanks or kicks it, it'll just pull the charger out. I realise that this won't work on flimsy US sockets, I also realise that a half-out plug can be a fire risk as well as cause damage to the connectors that can make it a permanent fire risk, so it's still a bad idea - even making a shelf out of the charger is a bad idea

  15. Coming next week! by Nailer235 · · Score: 1

    Next week's headline: "Eight year old's patent invalidated over prior art."

  16. Bryce, Bryce, Bryce by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    You have to sue people to make money from patents. Your daddy is the lawyer. He's the one who's going to makes money from your idea, not you.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  17. Patent Existing products by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    http://www.slipperybrick.com/2009/06/the-power-shelf-holds-your-gadgets-while-they-charge/

    I have had a device EXACTLY like this for over 10 years now. I bought one in 1999 at a strange thrift/junk store.

    Glad to see the patent system not checking to see if something exists already.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  18. Better Design Already Exists by TrekkieTechie · · Score: 1

    Not only have products like this been on the market for some time -- even big enough for laptops -- ThinkGeek sells a better one that keeps your phone from falling.

  19. at this rate.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the age of 12 he will be patent trolling.

  20. Sounds like sour grapes to me. by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    Here is a kid with developing engineering an entrepreneurial spirit, and you are poo-pooing it.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  21. My kid can beat up this kid!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had to go there... sorry... carry on...

  22. ...further illustrating patent system is broken by RapmasterT · · Score: 1

    Kid or not, the undeniable fact is this is a previously existing "invention" that has been on the market for about a decade (at least). 10 seconds with google produced a half dozen variations, so I doubt the kid, or parents were unaware of prior art.

    The fact that the patent office actually awards patents on things that are extraordinary slight variations on existing products is just showing how broken our patent system is. THAT is the story here, not some tinkering kid (although I would encourage him to keep at it, the world needs more As Seen On TV crap).

  23. Re:Considering how long it takes to get a patent.. by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    *double facepalm*

    Either his father encouraged his son to make the patent as a sign of goodwill to educate his child on how to become an entrepreneurial inventor, or he owns a patent troll company and needed to file a patent and used his son.

    I'll let ./ readers make up their mind.

    I'm hoping it was not the latter. Patent doesn't seem broad enough for a troll.

  24. Hockey Tickets by Lifyre · · Score: 1

    You know it's sad when the most interesting part about the article was that he wants to buy hockey skates and Buffalo Sabres tickets...

    --
    I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
  25. Yeah, Right by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

    Ya know, kids invent useful things all the time. People in general often invent useful things all the time. Just that almost no one has a patent attorney for a dad that's willing to force a patent through on the inventor's behalf. Ladies and gentlemen, we are not looking at the next Mozart or Da Vinci -- we are looking at the next Bill Gates whose real success wasn't a brilliance with computers, but having a shifty lawyer for a dad to teach his kid how to manipulate and leverage the laws in his favor, regardless of the merits of the actual invention.

    --
    "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. Prior art by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    Does this look familiar to anyone. They have been around for years. It looks like the kid patented a minor change to an outdoor cover plate so the door opens perpendicular to the wall.

  28. Re:Considering how long it takes to get a patent.. by Thinboy00 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ./ != /.

    ./ == . == $PWD ( == ~ ?)

    ...damn it /.! This isn't ascii art and I'm not yelling!

    --
    $ make available
  29. Re:Considering how long it takes to get a patent.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's most likely the former. Pretty much every child thinks of a few things like this (the idea is prety obvious but it takes a mind not encoumbered by "life experience", to think "why isn't there a shelf here? maybe I should put a shelf here." rather than "damn I need a longer cord" ), but since no one takes children seriously the only time anything comes of all those ideas is when their parents happen totake the inmitiative and add their voice supporting the child's (in this case by filing a patent).

  30. Re:Considering how long it takes to get a patent.. by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

    Yes, I can pronounce it, but are you sure you know what that means? Also, do you know what an outlet cover plate is? Because I'm pretty sure you don't cover all the outlets in your house with phone chargers and if you do you might want to look into switching as it's probably the reason your little kids keep dying from electrocution.

  31. Re:Considering how long it takes to get a patent.. by Liquidretro · · Score: 0

    The fact that his dad is a Patent lawyer and founder of a patent company is quite important here.

  32. Actual patent by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

    The actual patent references Westmeister, who is referred to at buypowershelf.com, the company behind the product at Amazon.

    http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=9&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=gunderman&OS=gunderman&RS=gunderman
    http://buypowershelf.com/Photos/Times%20At%20Home%20With%20Lynn%20Fetzer%20Westmeister.pdf

    Searching for Westmeister in the patent database brings up the Gunderman patent.

  33. Re:Considering how long it takes to get a patent.. by Shadyman · · Score: 1

    Outlet plate covers with a little place to put your cell phone already exist. Just not a 'shelf', it's more of a 'bowl' or a 'cup'. We've got a couple of them.

  34. Re:Considering how long it takes to get a patent.. by clone52431 · · Score: 1

    the idea is prety obvious but it takes a mind not encoumbered by "life experience", to think "why isn't there a shelf here? maybe I should put a shelf here."

    And I’m not sure whether to blame Tetris or my engineering degree for the idea “hey, why not just set my phone on top of the charger itself?”

    --
    Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
  35. Re:Considering how long it takes to get a patent.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay for free advertising, I guess?

    Speaking of an 8-year-old and a lot of money... the costs associated with filing a patent are "a lot of money". The cost is right at the pinnacle of what a "reasonable man" can afford for such extravagances - but chump change to a large corporation. There really needs to be a fee structure associated with patent filing.

  36. Re:Considering how long it takes to get a patent.. by dudpixel · · Score: 1

    and did you seriously expect that the patent office would objectively search for prior art before just granting the patent?

    all we need now is a patent on patents and the world will explode.

    --
    This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
  37. Re:Considering how long it takes to get a patent.. by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    the thing about all this is, i could almost swear i saw this exact thing for sale in a catalog over a year ago.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  38. Re:Considering how long it takes to get a patent.. by CarbonShell · · Score: 1

    I always have my doubts when I read these kind of reports because far to often after reading more details it usually is the parent that often pushes their super 'protégé' children and amazingly in the same field as they themselves work.

    Instinctively I'd call it a ploy to use the child's age to create public interest in the product they are selling.
    If it were not for the 'child wonder', would it have raised this level of interest?
    Follow the money!

    There are naturally exceptions but often enough it is not so crystal clear.