Slashdot Mirror
Free IPv4 Pool Now Down To Seven /8s
Zocalo writes "For those of you keeping score, ICANN just allocated another four /8 IPv4 blocks; 23/8 and 100/8 to ARIN, 5/8 and 37/8 to RIPE, leaving just seven /8s unassigned. In effect however, this means that there are now just two /8s available before the entire pool will be assigned due to an arrangement whereby the five Regional Internet Registries would each automatically receive one of the final five /8s once that threshold was met. The IPv4 Address Report counter at Potaroo.net is pending an update and still saying 96 days, but it's now starting to look doubtful that we're going to even make it to January."
So, I keep hearing all this news about them running low... What happens when we run out?
-Taylor
Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
Because I'm on it right now yet I see no AAAA record. Pretty much anyone on Comcast can get a 6rd address at the drop of a hat; native dual stack is coming. Other providers will have to get on the bandwagon soon I gather. Whine endless about the end of ipv4 after you've already made arrangements to join the modern age.
what needs "public" IPs? What /really/ needs them? routing interfaces between networks, and websites using ssl. Since a very large percentage of the web surfing population is still using windowsXP or older, we can't use TLS (which has been around for ages). So instead, every single ssl-enabled site needs it's own IP. I work at a small company, and even we could release hundreds of public IPs if WindowsXP could use tls instead of ssl.
I can announce and route down to a /32. It's up to my peers to accept that announcement. Some may and some may not. It depends upon politics, payment, router memory and BOFH whim.
A /24 is commonly the longest network accepted for re-announcement, but that is not a hard rule.
-- I have a private email server in my basement.
IP address reclamation will get us back at least 40% of the address space.
But not necessaries usable addresses on routable boundaries.
-- I have a private email server in my basement.
It will, ARIN will start handing out /28's. You think routers are choking on routes now, just wait. Edge networks that are multihomed will be ok, you can drop large swaths of announcements and still get plenty of diversity; in the core however....gonna suck for them. Or not...we'll see how it goes.
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four10
er, I have several publicly routable /29 blocks at several clients. Care to clarify your statement? As posted, it is misleading at best.
Why is IPv6 not based on MAC adresses? I've never understood this. Every piece of electronics capable of connecting to a network has at least one unique hardware id already. Why do we need a new one? Is there are reason not to just use this number? Or have I misunderstood, and this actually IS the plan.
I doubt that, there'd be no reason for anyone to write it up to not understand 240*
"Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
> I agree that the MAC address based network address is
> scary but I wonder how much of a signature they already
> have from other properties of my computer.. I wonder
> how long before the IPv6 address is used to try and
> prove that it was a specific computer that generated
> some traffic.
Here's a computer-user IQ test. Question "what is your MAC address?"
* Typical user... I don't got a Mac, I got a Winders PC.
* Competent user... checks his network config and supplies answer.
* l33t h@x0r d00d... what do you want it to be?
I'm not repeating myself
I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user