Slashdot Mirror


Tofu Activists Spoof Meat-Based Indie Game

Faulkner39 writes "In response to the recently released independently developed platformer Super Meat Boy, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has released a Flash-based spoof game titled Super Tofu Boy. The spoof attempts to mirror the original by featuring a protagonist made of tofu and an antagonist made of meat in a statement promoting animal rights. Ironically, however, the original game is about a human boy who is vulnerable because he lacks skin (Meat Boy), raising the question: 'is the spoof in reality really about cannibalism?'" The Super Meat Boy team posted a response on their Twitter feed.

34 of 420 comments (clear)

  1. Streisand effect by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had never heard of Super Meat Boy.

    1. Re:Streisand effect by mcvos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's wht the PETA spoof is so important for them. On their site they explain how they've been trolling the PETA forums, hoping for this to happen. Apparently with success. It's a weird kind of PR, but it works, because now you've heard of Super Meat Boy. Thanks to trolling, PETA and Slashdot.

    2. Re:Streisand effect by Yvanhoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a weird kind of PR, but it works, because now you've heard of Super Meat Boy. Thanks to trolling, PETA and Slashdot.

      I am feeling I am becoming too old for this century...
      And I am not even 30...

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    3. Re:Streisand effect by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2

      I tried to be funny and I am insightful...
      Now if this present observation gets labeled funny it will be depressing...

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  2. I feel about PETA like PETA seems to feel about me by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 5, Funny

    They offer downloads for PC and Mac. What, no Linux version? You mean I have to play the version on the website to play in Linux?

    If they won't give me Linux Tofu Boy, then I have absolutely no incentive to cease my consumption of meat. Clearly, they don't care about me, so I will continue to not care about them.

    I should go have a double down or something later....

    --
    Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
  3. PETA by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, maybe they could have spent some of that development money on outreach for their shelters, so that they wouldn't have to kill 86% of the animals they shelter.

    But no, I guess making video games, stockpiling red paint, and placing ads of naked hippies should really come first.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    1. Re:PETA by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem is that PETA don't think *any* animals should be domesticated, so mostly they don't even bother to try to rehome animals.

      Quite often they don't bother to find out if they're abandoned or unwanted - a couple of years ago two PETA activists were arrested for basically trapping cats and dogs (and indeed, going into people's gardens to catch them) and killing them. They claimed that the animals were "abandoned" or "strays", but couldn't offer any convincing reason for thinking they were. They weren't interested in animal welfare, they just liked stealing then torturing and killing people's pets.

    2. Re:PETA by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would not mind agreeing with you if it weren't for the fact that this is directly against PETA's stated goals. They want to eliminate ownership of animals, and eliminate the euthanasia of animals. Never mind that their central office euthanizes thousands of animals a year.

      It's not so much that I am against their ideals. I just can't stand f**ing hypocrites.

    3. Re:PETA by jamesh · · Score: 2

      If a domesticated animal has been abandoned and unwanted, the most humane thing to do is end its suffering as quickly and painlessly as possible.

      And having done that, it seems like of a waste not to eat its meat, make clothes out of it's skin, and glue out of its tendons.

    4. Re:PETA by jamesh · · Score: 2

      It's not so much that I am against their ideals. I just can't stand f**ing hypocrites.

      Bah. Hypocrisy is everywhere. What bugs me is that they somehow think that they know what is ethical in the first place. Who are they to decide that it is wrong for an animal to suffer? Seeing a suffering animal invokes feelings of sadness, horror, and disgust in most people (or in me at least) and they want to see it stop, but that's just how our brains are programed and it doesn't make it wrong. There have been studies that show that people who enjoy inflicting cruelty on an animal are more likely to grow up to be , but that doesn't mean that letting animals suffer or causing animals to suffer is wrong either.

      Unless there is some sort of god above, I don't think there is any innate law of the universe that determines what is wrong and what is right, it's up to us to decide. And just because PETA are noisy and violent doesn't make their point of view valid.

      </rant>

    5. Re:PETA by Gaygirlie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is that PETA don't think *any* animals should be domesticated, so mostly they don't even bother to try to rehome animals.

      That's one thing I've never understood. What exactly is wrong with an animal having a caring owner, someone to trust to, a warm home, no need to be afraid of predators, and not having to get cold and sometimes go days without food? I myself have two cats and I would say they are MUCH better off here with me than out there in the Finnish winter. Hell, you don't need to be an expert or anything to see that they actually like their life here. Even if I open the door and let them out they come back after 3 minutes, they just simply don't want to go there.

      So, I just simply do not understand PETA and their ideals.

    6. Re:PETA by HungryHobo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't you see man! It's like slavery! thinking you can "own" an animal.
      We can't "own" our animal equals!
      keeping a pet is so like exactly the same as slavery!

      or something absurd like that.

      either way everyone knows: dogs have owners, cats have staff.

    7. Re:PETA by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The reason PETA are disconnected from reality is that they are projecting their own self-loathing onto the arena of animal rights issues, rather than addressing animal rights with logic and rationality. The driving thought in a militant PETA member's head is that humans are disgusting worthless bullies and animals are perfect and angelic. Because humans are in a position of power over animals, they are evil, and revenge must be sought at every opportunity. They're projecting their own self loathing, and their own feelings of powerlessness onto an unrelated issue. When the time comes for them face a logic rebuttal to their behaviour, cognitive dissonance kicks to protect them from facing the fact that they have become the very bullies they despise.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    8. Re:PETA by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just can't stand f**ing hypocrites.

      Dunno why not, they're just as good in the sack as everyone else.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    9. Re:PETA by LingNoi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the goal is actually REDUCTION OF ANIMAL SUFFERING, it isn't "cruel" (anyone unsure of the meaning, get a fucking dictionary) to the animals to painlessly kill them.

      Logic failure.. So what if we rounded up all the homeless people; it wouldn't be cruel to painlessly kill them too? I'm sure lots of homeless people wouldn't mind you killing them because you believe they are suffering just as I'm sure the cats and dogs that are homeless wouldn't mind too.

      Before you start a debate about animal != human that's exactly what PETA is campaigning for. Rights for animals, so they're pretty much hypocrites.

      I can see from your post however that you believe people or animals should be killed regardless of if they want to. I wonder how you will feel later on when you yourself are getting old and your own death squad is coming for you.

    10. Re:PETA by Gaygirlie · · Score: 2

      Don't you see man! It's like slavery! thinking you can "own" an animal.
      We can't "own" our animal equals!
      keeping a pet is so like exactly the same as slavery!

      That's what they seem to claim, indeed. However, in slavery the slaver puts the slaves to work for him or her to produce something of value, but pets do not need to work, they do not produce anything, they just exist. Even when some people take their dogs out to hunting or something the pet actually most often enjoys it, it's not forced to it, it's good for it, and again is not slavery in the least bit.

      Of course there are some really horrible owners, but I atleast am not aware of any single one. A regular person usually takes good care of their pet or pets and provide for them in all the ways they might need. That is VERY different from what real slavery is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery

    11. Re:PETA by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Moral relativism is fine so long as you remember two things:

      • Everyone is under no obligation to respect any beliefs not their own.
      • You are part of the group Everyone, not an outside observer.

      Example: Westboro Baptist Church has every right in the world to believe their wacky shit. I have every right in the world to believe the world would be a better place if they were to all be raped, tortured, and then fed into a wood chipper. Neither of us has to give a happy damn about seeing things from the other's point of view.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    12. Re:PETA by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      I hate to think what horses have. If they're so badly treated then think about this - who gets up at 6am to go out in the snow and bring who their breakfast?

      And yes, you don't "own" a cat, they just come and live with you.

    13. Re:Peta by PitaBred · · Score: 2

      Not really. Genetics don't change that quickly. We've been eating meat for millions of years, and those dietary needs won't change. Most of the western world does eat a lot more meat than they need, but a healthy vegan needs supplements to make up for missing nutrients easily available in meat. Even more so for children.

    14. Re:PETA by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2

      That's one thing I've never understood. What exactly is wrong with an animal having a caring owner, someone to trust to, a warm home, no need to be afraid of predators, and not having to get cold and sometimes go days without food?

      Nothing at all. And I'm vegan.

      In fact, this is probably a good time to point out that not all vegans think the PETA people have their heads on straight. Just because I don't want to contribute to the cruelty that happens in factory farms doesn't mean I think animals should have the right to vote or whatever.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  4. We all know PETA is crazy by Dracos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They'll attempt to demonize any mention of carnivorous behavior, often without a complete grasp of what they are attacking-- as seen here. A boy with no skin must be countered with a lump of tofu? Obviously no one there actually played Super Meat Boy.

    PETA can't rightfully preach about animal rights while euthanizing tens of thousands of unwanted pets every year. Hypocrisy at its finest.

    1. Re:We all know PETA is crazy by dafing · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As a Vegan, I'm always interested when these issues come up on my usual websites. I, like many of the other Animal Rights people here visit Slashdot, Ars, Engadget, Gizmodo etc daily, we dont cause any fuss, but when these "stories" arise, "ohhhhh, they're hypocrites", or "I'm gonna have me a big steak, yummy mc yum yums!!!111!!!" are the usual posts.

      I'm also quite against PETA, they have a New Welfarist approach, I despise how they have Women pose and RE promoting Veganism, "screw the principle" http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/ingrid-newkirk-on-principled-veganism-screw-the-principle/

      "PETA can't rightfully preach about animal rights while euthanizing tens of thousands of unwanted pets every year. Hypocrisy at its finest.".

      They can "preach" Animal Rights while also practising euthanasia you realise? Just as I love being alive, but were I to have Cancer such as others in my family, I could well imagine rather being dead, than to die slowly over the months. Now, I much prefer the idea of No Kill shelters, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-kill_shelter , I dont know how practical they are in real life. I've had family members who've volunteered with the SPCA etc, I myself have no hands on experience of this kind.

      I agree with practically NOTHING coming from PETA, I think it must obviously be wrong that they "put to sleep" so many animals each year.

      However, please dont write off Animal Rights because of PETA's actions.

      http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/ and these shows http://bit.ly/veganpodcastinfo were useful for me.

      I also promote Veganism through videos of my Chicken Friends (such as "A Day in the Life..." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zj8gL8lj-Yg ), and through my show http://coexistingwithnonhumananimals.blogspot.com/

      --
      --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    2. Re:We all know PETA is crazy by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      I need to preface this by saying that I have absolutely nothing against vegans, especially when their viewpoint is presented logically and clearly and calmly, as you have.

      I have issues, however, when some vegans decide to claim the moral high ground over me, because I continue to eat meat. Let alone when they try to evangelise me. And I realize, baby with the bathwater. It's not fair to lump all vegans together in the same boat in the same way that it's not fair to lump all the Christians in the same boat: many, if not most of them just want to live their life in peace, and in keeping with what they consider ethical. It's just that a few wackjobs manage to mess it up for the rest of the world. In this case, we're talking about PETA, and they're a perfect example.

      That said, some people simply don't have a metabolism that allows them to get proper nutrition from a vegetarian lifestyle. I'm one of them. My body needs amino acids that I simply can't get from anything other than red meat (and I have food allergies to keep in mind). Now I don't eat red meat that often... in fact, I really only eat meat once or twice a week at all (including fish), but I would risk serious health problems if I were to stop eating meat entirely. I do hope that when you started being a vegan, you had tests done to make sure that you were/are getting the nutrition you need to be healthy, as it could be years before you really notice or are at risk from something like a calcium deficiency. (bad example, because brocoli and other dark green vegetables are loaded with the stuff).

      As for PETA itself, they're nuts. I have met exactly one person who supports PETA that isn't nuts. I keep pets: I have 2 cats and a dog. One of the cats just showed up at my door one day as a stray... we fed him when he'd take it from us, but he was quite happily living as feral and hunting his own food. He'd just decided that our house was a good place to declare as his territory, and we were OK with that. For about 6 months, there wasn't any change in our routine... he'd come knocking from time to time for food, but otherwise he'd be happy to hunt mice, voles, chipmunks, squirrels, and the occasional bird on our property; then one day in December, it was about -35 degrees outside, we convinced him to come inside. He bolted for the basement, and we didn't see him for 3 days, but now, years later, he's part of the family. PETA probably would have put him to sleep, but he's such a gentle and affectionate animal, I can't believe he was once feral. The other two animals we share our home with came from the humane society, and they were both rescues. If you listen to the hardline PETA folks, we're cruel to our pets, because we keep them inside when they're meant to be free, but I think the PETA folks are nuts. I also think that it would be downright cruel to turn the cats out, or the dog for that matter, when I know that a house cat probably couldn't survive a Canadian winter outside, not when it gets down to -40'C some nights (and that's before you count in the wind chill, I've experienced -60'C including the wind chill).

  5. Peta by Teun · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Peta should stick to their valid core business of fighting ill treatment of animals.

    Vegetarians are a whole different and sad subspecies of humankind, they try to deny we've been eating meat from animals since many millions of years.

    As a matter of fact we've become the creatures we are because we ate animals, for example there is strong evidence of a correlation in humanoids starting to eat seafood and a jump in intelligence that led to the making and use of tools.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  6. Re:Meet the Characters by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Informative

    They think that's gross? The villain of SMB is Dr. Fetus, a fetus in a jar. Bosses include a happy ball of blood, a meat boy clone made of feces and a living pile of corpses. Oh and animals constantly get murdered by the saw blades everywhere as they try to flee from the carnage as Dr. Fetus destroys more and more of the world.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  7. Bunch of dicks by GF678 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No, not PETA, the developers of Super Meat Boy.

    After hearing about this game I was curious as to whether a Linux version was available or in the works. I ended up at http://www.indiegames.com/blog/2010/10/indiegamescom_podcast_5_super.html, and a commenter put a link to a podcast with the developers here: http://www.levelfortytwo.com/2009/12/talk-is-cheap-12-21-09/

    The relevant bit starts at 43:55. Basically, they think that a Linux version would mean it would have to be open source, which obviously it doesn't. To quote one of the developers: "Linux can fuck off as far as I'm concerned." Gee, thanks. I don't mind if you're not going to bother making a port to Linux, but to not even bother to understand what people are asking and instead resorting to profanity shows these guys are a bunch of closed-minded dicks.

  8. It's probably about cannibalism... by Grapplebeam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Because their president wants to be cooked at a barbecue when she dies, to disgust people from eating meat. Or something. Honestly, the idea was so nuts, I forgot to take notes on why, and merely listened to the what. Because when you're spoon-out-your-eyeballs crazy like that, it's hard not to be inadvertantly entertaining and terrifying at the same time.

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree.
    1. Re:It's probably about cannibalism... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      It used to be SOP to eat the dead in many cultures. There's still tribes where the custom is for the new chief to eat the heart of the old one when he dies. What's crazy about that? People are made out of meat. Crazy would be killing them to eat them when the alternative is not starvation but merely menu boredom.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. What does eating meat add to you? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    Well, it is a more concentrated form of protein, which leaves you more time from gathering roots and berries, to like, build stuff, like pyramids, dams, hospitals , a civilization and the like.

    This guy had a good take at it all: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Bronowski

    My girlfriend had a veggie book, that claimed that eating meat was against human instinct; "who would ever think of eating a nice, cuddly squirrel?"

    I countered with a quote from Benjamin Franklin, "hunger never saw bad bread'.

    Veggieism is an ethical, rather than a physiological evolution. If you decide to be a veggie, make sure that you take many vitamin supplements. Otherwise, you will devolve what your hairy assed ancestors discovered . . . eating meat is good for you, and efficient.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  10. It's dicks, all the way down... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Indeed, I hate PETA as much as any right-minded individual, but these guys pulled a dick-move. They basically trolled the PETA forums with a bunch of sock-puppet accounts in order to goad them into action and to get publicity for their game, which seems, judging by the /. comments, to have not made it onto many peoples' radar. Yet again, PETA have made the world a worse place in which to live. This time by giving these tumbling tumbling dick-weeds the publicity they are so obviously desperate for.

  11. Re:Meet the Characters by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2

    That's one of the reasons why nobody takes PETA seriously: They operate on the same level as 4chan trolling Habbo Hotel. I mean, I've seen some fairly grown-up actions from Anonymous but PETA consistently acts like an antisocial teenager.

    Plus, whenever they want to "parody" something it's always mean-spirited and extremely badly researched, ending up carrying a lot of unfortunate implications - such as Super Tofu Boy, which manages to casually describe eating animals as being identical to cannibalism. Way to go, PETA.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  12. Re:Not a bad attempt... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So your'e saying that Tofu is presented as a complete replacement for Meat but is neither as tasteful (cf. the STB backstory) nor as satisfying? How deliciously ironic.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  13. Re:The sanity in vegetarianism. by clone52431 · · Score: 2

    raw meat is instinctualy repugnant

    No, it’s culturally repugnant. And even so, plenty of people still consume raw meat on a regular basis.

    In addition to the obvious sushi, many forms of smoked or dried meat are not cooked (e.g. jerky and many varieties of ham), any good steak should be raw in the middle (and anyone who prefers their steak turned into shoe leather is an idiot), steak tartare is considered a delicacy, Caesar salad dressing is made with raw egg, etc. etc. etc.

    What’s more, cooking meat creates carcinogenic compounds, so if it weren’t for the risk of disease and parasites, meat would be healthiest if it was consumed raw anyway.

    --
    Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
  14. You are probably for animal WELFARE, not rights by abbyful · · Score: 2

    Animal WELFARE = treat animals humanely, co-exist with animals, if animals are killed for food it should be as quick and painless as possible.

    Animal RIGHTS = extinction of domestic animals, zero human/animal interaction
    (yes, I know humans are animals, by animal I mean non-human animal)