Slashdot Mirror


GM Loses Money On Every Volt Built

thecarchik writes "Doug Parks, vehicle line executive for the 2011 Chevrolet Volt, GM's range-extended electric vehicle, confirmed Tuesday that the company loses money on every Volt it sells. The expensive 16-kilowatt-hour battery pack, which likely costs GM somewhere between $8,000 and $12,000, is clearly too expensive to let the company build hundreds of thousands of Volts right away. Just 10,000 Volts will be built in 2011, though GM is working to increase that number. GM plans to chip away incrementally to lower the costs of the specialized components in the Volt, especially the power electronics. The price of consumer lithium-ion cells has fallen 6 to 8 percent annually since their 1989 launch; the large-format cells in automotive packs seem likely to follow the same curve and as costs are lowered the Volt may stop being a loss for the company."

9 of 471 comments (clear)

  1. This is only temporary by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is only an issue in lower volume production runs.

    Although they can never overcome the cost penalty associated with each vehicle, they can make it up in volume.

    1. Re:This is only temporary by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This got modded +5, Insightful? Good grief, Charlie Brown.

      FWIW, the US government wasn't buried in debt or routinely running massive deficits until Reagan/Bush Sr. Then Bush Jr. came along and for the first time ever the government was stupid enough to start wars (which are really quite expensive) with not only no plan to pay for them, but while cutting taxes at the same time. Today, the same people who voted for the likes of Dick "deficits don't matter" Cheney are screaming bloody murder about "Obama's deficit spending" with no apparent comprehension of how surreal this and their other behaviors are.

      Meanwhile, Congress (at the behest of the party of "fiscally responsibility") is deciding whether to saddle us with $3.6T or $4.2T of further debt by extending the Bush tax cuts for the next 10 years. The same titans of responsibility absolutely refuse to consider the idea of paying off our debt with taxes, but can't seem to name anything that consumes more than .1 percent of the federal budget when pressed for programs to cut.

      (I consider the modern Republican party to be nothing more than a scam that seeks power for the explicit purpose of perverting the United States into some combination of theocracy and corporate plutocracy. I hold the Democrats in marginally less contempt; At least they generally offer the people a reacharound while they're screwing us)

    2. Re:This is only temporary by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      (I consider the modern Republican party to be nothing more than a scam that seeks power for the explicit purpose of perverting the United States into some combination of theocracy and corporate plutocracy. I hold the Democrats in marginally less contempt; At least they generally offer the people a reacharound while they're screwing us)

      The Democratic Party exists to occupy the space that would otherwise be taken by a real opposition party. They're like the placebo thermostat building maintenance installs in the office so the workers can think that they're adjusting the temperature and quit complaining.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  2. That's fine... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 5, Funny

    It won't be a problem. They can make it up in volume.

  3. Re:Not Surprising by PixelJaded · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Obviously you've never worked in a highly competitive mass-market industry. $1 billion R&D / tooling cost is pretty normal for a mass market GM vehicle platform. If you're selling 1+ million vehicles at $50k then $1,000,000,000 is chump change. If you spend $100 million on development / tooling you'll either lose out badly on unit costs, lose out badly on quality or both against someone like Toyota, GM, Ford, Volkswagen, etc. who are plowing the $1+ billion necessary into each platform. This is not news purely because GM went into the volt expecting to lose money the first few years. Its not the million vehicles they sell over the next few years that they care about (that's tiny compared to their pure petrol / diesel volume), its the several million hybrids or all-electric vehicles they expect to be selling every year by 2020 that they're focusing on.

  4. This no big deal by Howard+Roark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a well known fact that all hybrids lose money at first. Toyota lost something like $5000 on each early model Prius. This will all work out.

    --
    Howard Roark, Architect
    I believe in a Man's right to exist for his own sake.
  5. In the Red vs Negative Margin by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you spend $1,000,000,000 developing a product that you sell for $50k then you will make a loss to start with - no matter what.

    That's not what this is about. This is not about fixed or one-time costs. This is about gross margins on each item sold. That means the delta between what you can sell a given instance of the product for, and what it cost to make that particular instance above and beyond any expenses already incurred.

    If you spend $1bil to develop a product and tool the factor etc, then prior to making or selling any product you are $1bil in the red. You have lost this amount of money even if you never sell a single product. So this cost alone cannot be used to say that you lose money on every item sold.

    If, in addition to those costs, building an instance of the product costs $40k in labor, materials, and energy and you sell it for $50k, then you have a gross margin of $10k, and after the sale your total balance for the project is $999,990,000. You have made $10k on the sale. Sell enough product at this margin, and you'll eventually pay off the R&D expenses and the project as a whole will be in the black.

    If, on the other hand, it costs $60k to build that product and you sell it for $50k, then your gross margin is $-10k, and your balance after the sale is $1,000,010,000. You have lost $10k on the sale. Every product you sell is actually costing you more money, not making you money. Unless costs are cut or prices raised, you can never pay back the expenses, because every sale simply costs you more money.

    That is what it means to say "GM loses money on every Volt built".

    However, TFA itself seems to be slightly confused on this distinction, and does not provide any link to the actual alleged quote. If Doug Park actually said that they are going to lose money on every Volt sold, then the 'gross margin' sense is what he meant. If he said that they don't expect the Volt (as in the project) to be profitable for several years, then that most likely means they are selling the Volt for a profit and hope to make back their expenses in several years.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  6. Re:Next question by Black+Gold+Alchemist · · Score: 5, Informative

    Who is building all the new power generating plants we'll need when millions of drivers have electric cars? Now is the time to start. You can't build those plants overnight.

    No one is, because no one needs to. Four big EV denier myths:

    More electricity needed - debunked. Here's the link to the original Oak Ridge Nation Laboratory Report (currently down).

    More global warming - not true. DOE estimates average of 1.3 lbs CO2 per kWh. Coal (the worst CO2 emitter) emits 2.1 lbs CO2 per kWh. Electric cars get between 4 and 10 miles per kWh. Worst case, that means 0.5 pounds of CO2 per mile. 1 gallon = 19.4 lbs of CO2. So, that's around 38 mpg CO2 emissions equivalent in the absolute worst case scenario. In the average case, we are looking at around 59.7 MPG. Diesel emits more CO2 than gasoline, by a factor of about 1.15. So, worst case is 43.7 MPG diesel, and average is 68.7 MPG diesel. These numbers are EPA testing of Tesla roadster and Rav4EV.

    Rare lithium - peak lithium is a Li.

    Toxic batteries - lithium-ion is largely non-toxic. Tesla was working on recycling before the cars even hit the streets. Lead acid (which is toxic) is 97% recycled.

    --
    Responsibility is an addiction
    Virtue is a temptation
    Community is a cartel
  7. Re:Not Temporary, Microeconomics is stubborn by guyminuslife · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, it wouldn't be a conspiracy theory to not believe in a conspiracy. Unless that were the conspiracy. My question is, who is behind this conspiracy to make us believe that there's a conspiracy? Clearly they're doing it to draw attention away from the truth of their non-conspiracy. Perhaps this GM bailout could have absolutely nothing to do with the Illuminati and the Freemasons. Maybe the Volt isn't a coverup for the Kennedy assassination. Once you go down the rabbit hole...you'll probably find rabbits.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.