Slashdot Mirror


Feds Warrantlessly Tracking Americans' Real Time Credit Card Activity

PatPending writes "A 10-page Powerpoint presentation (PDF) that security and privacy analyst Christopher Soghoian recently obtained through a Freedom of Information Act Request to the Department of Justice reveals that law enforcement agencies routinely seek and obtain real-time surveillance of credit card transactions. The government's guidelines reveal that this surveillance often occurs with a simple subpoena, thus sidestepping any Fourth Amendment protections."

2 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. Re:We are all suspects, welcome to the police stat by pspahn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    37%, 10%, 100%, completely irrelevant if elected officials actually did the things people want them to do. If someone wins with 37%, well that's great and all, but that doesn't mean that the other 63% are going to disagree with everything that person does. There is too much importance placed on the election, and very little importance placed on what the elected subsequently do.

    I vote third party precisely because I want to siphon votes away from either a Demican or a Republocrat. There is no "lesser of two evils". They are both equally shitty.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  2. Re:A records subpoena is a court order. by moeinvt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I understand your argument correctly, you're saying that a law enforcement officer can, with NO search warrant, and with no intervention whatsoever by a court:

    - Track every credit card purchase that I've ever made up to the present moment
    - Search through the history of transactions I've made at my local library
    - See records of all of my telephone calls
    - view my accountant's copy of all of my tax records
    - review any and all personal correspondences that I've sent to friends
    - see my complete transaction history at my bank
    - review all of the stock/bond transactions that I've made with my broker. ...

    I certainly hope that no court would subscribe to your bizarre interpretation of the Fourth Amendement.