Slashdot Mirror


Two Major Ad Networks Found Serving Malware

Trailrunner7 writes "Two major online ad networks — DoubleClick and MSN — were serving malware via drive-by download exploits over the last week, experts say, after a group of attackers was able to trick the networks into displaying their ads by impersonating an online advertising provider. The scheme involved a group of attackers who registered a domain that was one letter away from that of ADShuffle.com, an online advertising technology firm. The attackers then used the fake domain — ADShufffle.com — to dupe the advertising networks into serving their malicious banner ads. The ads used various exploits to install malware on victims' PCs through drive-by downloads, according to information compiled by security vendor Armorize."

4 of 330 comments (clear)

  1. Noscript wins again by wizardforce · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One more example of why ad blocking has its security benefits. What's worse is that doubleclick and friends are used by pretty much every site out there including Slashdot. It's a shame that although a lot of people would be willing to support sites like Slashdot allowing a few ads to load occasionally; doubleclick just isn't trustworthy enough to allow that.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:Noscript wins again by cappp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And this is why I blanket block all ads on all sites. It's an incrediably blunt instrument, but its the only way to avoid this kind of thing apparantly.

      What sucks is that I'd actually like to support the sites I frequently visit, and ad views clearly have a significant effect on their various bottom lines, but I just can't justify exposing myself to whatever that week's ad-based crazy shit danger happens to be. It's similar to how I feel about porn sites - the responsible part of my wants to subscribe and send them a little cash for the assistance rendered by their presentation of jiggly bits being jiggly...but that same responsible part is also well aware that any kind of commercial interaction with said pornographers has a suspicious way of going horribly wrong.

      So now I find myself chosing between doing that right thing - supporting the services I use - and the secure thing. And as it happens, the secure thing wins out.

    2. Re:Noscript wins again by Ecuador · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are not bad on the insulting department. Not great on the how things work department though, but with that attitude you can't possibly be helped.

      Just so we are clear, originally I did not think you were dumb. My tone was aiming to make it clear to you and to other people that debit cards are a bad idea regardless how well you think you have thought things through. In my second favorite forum (FW Finance) I have read so many stories about how people have gotten screwed, it is not even funny. For example, do you know that debit card transactions are processed by the end of the day in an order the Bank decides? What do you think will happen with a fraudulent charge the same day as a legit purchase? Also, did you know that normally a merchant asks for authorization before putting a charge through (and gets declined in your case if you don't have funds), but at least the VISA network also allows charges WITHOUT authorization (and think whether a fraudster will ask for authorization)? That was probably how I got a negative charge on an account that had no overdrawing and if you think a negative balance on your bank account does not mean that is your money missing, you are sadly mistaken.
        Anyway, I at least hope you don't use a really bad (customer-friendly-wise) bank (like, say, BofA).
      And to re-iterate, no, I did not think you were dumb, but you did come out as a douche with your second post.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  2. Re:I've seen stuff coming from MSN for quite somet by mlts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of my honeypot VMs I use for Web browsing got hit by that when I was visiting a top named site.

    In my experience, now that a lot of users are not just running executables willy-nilly, compromised ad networks serving up malicious pages to try to compromise browsers or add-ons is the #1 threat in my book.

    To drive the point home, I use AdBlock on the main machine I use for Web browsing. I have yet to see a single script related to PC Antivirus. In reality, AdBlock provides more protection than most AV utilities, because once the Web browser is compromised, most AV utilities are completely useless in detecting and stopping that.