Slashdot Mirror


Operation Payback and Hactivism 101

Orome1 writes "While individual acts of hacktivism are inconvenient, something else happens when hacktivists group together — they commonly perform a DDoS attack. Techniques have advanced to automate the process, making the attacks more powerful and thus more able to bypass security controls — the effect, however, remains the same. Let us take a look at the recent Operation Payback which has gained notoriety in the past few months."

8 of 423 comments (clear)

  1. It is Not DDoS by arthurpaliden · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is not DDoS or cyber-war it is cyber-picketing. It used to be that when you had a disagreement with a company people picked it and disrupted its business that way. Well, welcome to the 21 century you can now picket the business from the comfort of your own home.

    1. Re:It is Not DDoS by Ephemeriis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is not DDoS or cyber-war it is cyber-picketing.

      It used to be that when you had a disagreement with a company people picked it and disrupted its business that way. Well, welcome to the 21 century you can now picket the business from the comfort of your own home.

      Interesting. Though I loathe the "cyber" prefix... That doesn't seem like a completely inaccurate description. Hadn't thought of it that way.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    2. Re:It is Not DDoS by amRadioHed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No picketer ever stopped someone from entering a store. Such an action would be an arrestable offence, as it would involve, at minimum, the physical assault of prospective customers, and probably trespass...

      ...neither of which apply to the online equivalent.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  2. Re:This isn't activism by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bet that's the same thing the people in power said back in the '60s...

    --
    - These characters were randomly selected.
  3. Re:Can we PLEASE.... by Moryath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Programming is a hacking subculture. Or, program hacking is a subculture of hacking generally.

    The people who are program hackers today, would have been gearheads 60 years ago, constantly tweaking their engines for performance.

  4. Re:Let's break the law by orphiuchus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    These people don't have the attention span to actually do anything like that. They are just like the hippies who thought that sitting around, singing, and doing drugs instead of contributing to society would change things. Everybody wants a shortcut, the truth is that the best way to change things is through hard work within the system, only stepping out of it when that fails.

  5. Re:This isn't activism by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They weren't preventing anyone from talking, they were however doing what they could to disrupt business.

    You know, under normal circumstances I'd be very against what those acting under the "Anonymous" label have done, just as many on Slashdot are right now. But these are not normal circumstances. We have a government - correction, we have an establishment, because this is an unholy alliance of government, big business, and big media, all of whom are covering up and even assisting with each other's crimes, that's gone rogue. And not just mildly rogue, it's an establishment that's fraudulently launched wars, kidnapped, tortured, raped, and destroyed. There are literally tens of millions of direct victims of this government, and hundreds of thousands of people victimized to the point of being tortured, raped, kidnapped, or killed.

    Two years ago this country reacted to what little was getting out by electing someone who had claimed to be against this (and made it a big part of what he supposedly stood for) since he first hit the national spotlight in 2004. And his actions on taking office? To continue virtually every aspect of what made the previous administration so evil, in some cases going further.

    Meanwhile, when there's even a hint that some of the truth will come out, the establishment has lead Denial of Service attacks of their own, with the major credit card companies abusing their monopoly to make it harder for such acts to be funded, and Amazon.com going as far not merely to disconnect Wikileaks, but to spread smears against them, smears they're continuing to spread today.

    So I'm ambivalent about the hacker attacks. Frankly, I think most of the "victims" deserve it - in fact, they deserve much worse. In a decent world, we'd see:

    1. Amazon.com facing lawsuits for breach of contract, and facing serious libel lawsuits for the disgusting smears they're peddling and continuing to peddle
    2. Visa and Mastercard facing monopolist charges, with the real possibility of facing either nationalization or a major break-up
    3. Various directors, found to have knowingly participated in conspiring to these denial of service attacks against Wikileaks, finding themselves personally liable, fined, and barred
    4. Given what they're trying to cover up, I wouldn't even feel criminal charges against these thugs occur. If I tried to cover up crimes even a fraction as bad as those they're trying to cover up, I'd be facing jail time.

    Be very clear about this: these organizations are doing what they're doing for no other purpose than to assist a rogue establishment in preventing the people from knowing the about the crimes it has committed. They're helping in a campaign to prevent people from knowing that the government, and the media, lied about the wars they started. They're helping in a campaign to prevent people from knowing that, for example, private contractors can rape and kill with impunity, that the government will continue to give them money after they've done so, and that the media will, just by being asked, not report upon it, or if it does, bury it where it will not be seen.

    This is what is being hidden. This is what people like Jeff Bezos are more than willing to be a part of.

    And I'm supposed to be upset about a bunch of frustrated "hackers" trying to bring down their web servers? Why? They're not engaging in violence, they're not preventing anyone from speaking, and the "right" options - the ones everyone are supposed to use before breaking the law - have been denied in the worst way possible. Democracy was tried. The law isn't even available.

    I'm not going to encourage anyone to assist with the DDoS attacks, and not going to engage in them myself. But I simply cannot condemn them. And frankly, if Jeff Bezos or the directors of the major credit cards were in front of me right now, I'd spit on them.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  6. Re:This isn't activism by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Guess what, the Taliban calls you a "spoiled brat acting like thugs".
    Iran calls you that.
    North Korea calls the western world that.

    It makes it a lot easier to hate the other side if you give them a derogatory name and belittle them.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.