Slashdot Mirror


Hands-On With Google's Cr-48

adeelarshad82 writes "While Google has made it clear that Cr-48 is nothing more than a test prototype, it was interesting to see the machine Google used to demonstrate Chrome OS. Out of the box, the Cr-48 conjures images of the Black Apple MacBook, from the plain, rubberized chassis to what looks like the same chiclet-style keyboard. The 12-inch notebook weighs about 3.8lbs and comes with a clickpad which recognizes one finger as a left click, while a two-finger tap triggers a right-click function. The laptop obviously contains a hard drive for storing backup data, but the capacity is unknown. The notebook comes with a lone USB port on the right side, which has limited functionaly. For now, thumb drives, hard drives, cameras, printers and other USB peripherals do not work with Cr-48. Google is working on getting its Chrome OS to recognize storage drives, but it's a work in progress. Once Chrome OS does recognize storage drives, users can probably install other OSes on Cr-48 for fun. Video playback seems to struggle with Hulu videos, while YouTube clips were okay. The device operates at a 1,280x800 resolution, which means the Cr-48 can theoretically support 720p video playback, but the videos were capped at 480p." Engadget posted photos a Cr-48 teardown if you'd like a look at its guts. An article at InfoWorld suggests Google needs to work on the cloud offerings underpinning the device.

33 of 158 comments (clear)

  1. Huh? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unknown capacity? I checked the about:system logs, although I have a hard time reading them, it seems to indicate sda1 is 16gb in size. Correct me if I'm wrong though.

    Also I think I was able to get 720p; I'm not sure. But it's easy to check, I'm sure you can try lowering your desktop res and seeing if YouTube caps the resolution. But I doube it.

  2. How much storage isn't what you should ask... by Salamanders · · Score: 2

    The storage was the biggest mind-bending moment for getting going with the CR-48. I unwrapped it, wondered "how much storage does it have" and then a moment later realized that my thinking had become very un-dude. It doesn't matter how much storage it has!

    1. Re:How much storage isn't what you should ask... by Nadaka · · Score: 2

      Storage for me is still a factor. To put it in perspective, my phone has more storage than the CR-48.

  3. I found John Resig's review to be interesting by rsborg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here:

    The trackpad is absolutely infuriating. It’s as if Google attempted to create a similar trackpad to the Macbook Pro but just got it all wrong. There is two-finger scrolling (good) but no acceleration. Tap-to-click is frustrating and I disabled it immediately. There is no three-finger swipe-to-go-back gesture (which I miss a lot). Performing text selection is absolutely insane. It seems like any combination of having two fingers on the mouse pad simultaneously throws the laptop into “scroll” mode. It’s so bad that it makes me not want to write things on the laptop until it is fixed. As mentioned before there appears to be physical way of doing a right click – but I can’t find a single place in the UI where right-clicking has an effect.

    I found this almost exact issue with the cheap netbook trackpads. Too bad Google didn't put a bit more effort into their prototype there.

    The keyboard is easily the best part of the Cr-48 hardware. Replacing Capslock with a “New Tab” button is truly inspired. I’ve found myself already starting to rely upon it very heavily. The keyboard feels good to type on and the large Ctrl + Alt keys make for easy key combinations (important when using screen).

    Sounds great.

    Right now my ideal laptop would be: Take a 13 Macbook Pro, replace the HD with an SSD, replace the DVD drive with more battery, add 3G. I would use that laptop until the end of time.

    This is pretty much my setup (external battery unfortunately, and USB 3G card).

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:I found John Resig's review to be interesting by beelsebob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Looks like someone's cranky that apple got their trackpad drivers right and can't cope with the idea that apple can produce things that work well.

    2. Re:I found John Resig's review to be interesting by RobertM1968 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hmmm... I know you in particular weren't really complaining, but numerous of these reviews are. And I can't figure out why...

      (1) it's a prototype

      (2) it should be the lowest common denominator - not the highest. Best way to test and tweak things. It's why I know what I download/install/test on my T-Mo G1 (or on an ADP1) will work very well on other hardware.

      (3) They (Google) paid for 60,000 of these (in money or other considerations) - did you really expect TEST PROTOTYPE versions to be uber-high end?

      (4) A lot of the complaints seem to be about unfinished or untweaked stuff... to that, I have to say "DUH!!!!" - that is, after all, the purpose of this testing. To see what needs to be improved. To see what needs to be replaced/re-written. To allow testing while Google finishes off other parts of the software for these types of devices.

      I dunno... that's my opinion on this. Yours may vary. :-)

    3. Re:I found John Resig's review to be interesting by taucross · · Score: 2

      Apple, by its own admission, doesn't produce things that work well. They produce things that "just work".

      --
      "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
  4. Weird by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2

    I've read case studies about product life cycles... watching something go from cutting edge, proprietary and lucrative to being a virtual commodity with low (normal?) profit margins. yet it is weird living through this with the PC. I remember my first PC around '79... very expensive and not able to do much. Today, PCs are way overpowered for what 99% of the population needs. New features are not driving much in the way of additional sales.

    Google looks to make the "PC" experience consistent for everyone with much less fussing and fewer options. While I rebel against this myself, I must admit that for most folks, Google's offering seems to make a lot of sense.... most people just want to get on the net, send an email and check out facebook. Google offers this without having to configure anything.

    So yeah, we have moved from the wild frontier to the "just another product" category. In some ways I will miss it... in others I think it is overdue. And no, Google isn't the first offering like this.... however it is the first from a company with enough financial, technical and social connections to make it work.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  5. I was disappointed by Google... by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and here's why:

    While the Cr-48's big event recently could be seen worldwide over the internet infrastructure that Google itself supports, testing of this device was only limited to those residing in the US!

    This was unfair to those outside the United States. Making things even worse was the fact that at registration, one only came to this realization after being asked about what the U.S. State of residence is. This would be after asking for all other information!

    Google should have allowed those without a U.S. shipping address to be billed for any expenses if they really wanted to be part of the testing regime. Heck...Google has "Google Checkout", right?

    I was not happy at all. Google being a worldwide company would have benefited a lot from worldwide input.

    How am I wrong?

    1. Re:I was disappointed by Google... by Ultra64 · · Score: 3, Funny

      How dare google not offer free things to everyone in the world!

    2. Re:I was disappointed by Google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but when doing any sort of LIMITED testing, you generally want to have some constraints on the testing conditions, correct? Wouldn't geographic location seem to be a reasonable constraint then? Or are you one of those people whose first instinct when testing something is to throw as many random variables into the mix all at once?

  6. Just a Prototype by Dialecticus · · Score: 3, Funny

    While Google has made it clear that Cr-48 is nothing more than a test prototype...

    I'm waiting for the final version, which I presume will be called the C-64. I hope my old "Little Computer People" disk is still viable...

    1. Re:Just a Prototype by sorak · · Score: 3, Funny

      While Google has made it clear that Cr-48 is nothing more than a test prototype...

      I'm waiting for the final version, which I presume will be called the C-64. I hope my old "Little Computer People" disk is still viable...

      I thought the final version was going to be Cr-48 beta.

  7. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why on Earth do people care about this thing? You've got a big community that used to be mostly Open-Source advocates, and you can't even install software on this darn netbook. The *only* benefit to the average consumer is its low cost.

    Right now we've got a bunch of idiots figuring out what tasks they'll use this for instead of their laptop or their netbook. The answer is none. If you are fortunate to own either of those devices, they'll do everything that this stupid thing will do *and* all of the stuff that they normally do. There is no reason at all for you to want a CR-48, aside from feeling cool that you got to be part of a Google beta program.

    1. Re:What? by DragonWriter · · Score: 2

      Why on Earth do people care about this thing? You've got a big community that used to be mostly Open-Source advocates

      And a demonstration device running what is mostly (entirely?) an open source OS (Chromium OS is open source, not sure if Chrome OS has closed components -- I thoght Flash was, but the popular Chromium OS builds apparently have "full Flash support", so unless they've replaced the built in support with something else...)

      I think I might detect a connection...

      and you can't even install software on this darn netbook.

      So?

    2. Re:What? by Chyeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We've done this before, anyone remember thin clients?

      Maybe this time 'the cloud' will take off, maybe not.

      But either way, yes this has the potential for being big.

    3. Re:What? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 2

      We've done this before, anyone remember thin clients?

      Maybe this time 'the cloud' will take off, maybe not.

      But either way, yes this has the potential for being big.

      Bingo! And there were some companies that made (and still do) extensive use of them. CompUSA used them a lot for various of their systems, all hooked to their own "cloud". The market still exists, if there are people out there willing to fulfill the right needs.

      Fortunately, Microsoft seems to have given up on their thin client model, and has no idea what cloud computing is. That gives me hope that true cloud computing will find it's place, driven by those who do understand the potentials. Heh, to think that one of the big honchos in Microsoft's Office Online stuff cited their vast "cloud computing" experience as their botched takeover of Hotmail (and subsequent half decade to finally migrate it from Solaris and FreeBSD to Windows) made me laugh my ass off.

  8. of course hulu was slow by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

    it's flash. Youtube was serving up H.264 (or possibly WebM).

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:of course hulu was slow by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Hulu doesn't use the newer video acceleration features in Flash, YouTube does.

      With the right hardware hooks, you can play back a BluRay rip on a machine that has no hope of dealing with Hulu.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  9. Timing... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 2

    Well, I am glad I got in my request for one days before this story got posted here. Hopefully that will improve my chances.

    Anyway, simple fact is, a lot of things have moved, or will be moving into "the cloud" - especially with the popularity of AndroidOS based phones. I for one never ever ever want to go back to managing and maintaining contacts on a damn cell phone again. Much rather be able to add them "to the cloud" and edit/change them from my PC/phone/whatever from "the cloud" - and replace my phone with another Android based phone (hey, my G1 is definitely up for retirement) and need do nothing but log in. Same goes for a variety of other Google Services.

    Whether this laptop is great, sucks, whatever; true cloud computing (ie: forget Microsoft's lame commercials - they understand cloud computing as much as they did/do object oriented programming... inotherwords, not at all)... true cloud computing is going to become a lot more prevalent in this day and age. Jumping on that bandwagon early as it grows is a good thing. If Google doesn't get this right on the first time out, I am sure they will work on improving it.

    1. Re:Timing... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I for one never ever ever want to go back to managing and maintaining contacts on a damn cell phone again. Much rather be able to add them "to the cloud" and edit/change them from my PC/phone/whatever from "the cloud" - and replace my phone with another Android based phone (hey, my G1 is definitely up for retirement) and need do nothing but log in. Same goes for a variety of other Google Services.

      I like the cloud for contacts and calendar, too. But, I dont' want to give Google any more info on me than they already have.... so I am running a Zimbra server that lets me push stuff to my phone. Giving Google full control over all my info, documents, and apps, does not sound like a good time to me.

      And why can't you use your own cloud servers? I'm only a half decent programmer, but I know how to use both dedicated/our own cloud servers AND link what data I need/want to through Google's services for where there's overlap (like contacts, maps, docs, picasa, etc). It's very very easy. All the APIs are in place. Anyone with just a little programming skill can do it.

      Heck, you can even run your own versions of Google's services to "disconnect" from them yet still run the same services solely for you and/or your customers.

  10. Not really... by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Today, PCs are way overpowered for what 99% of the population needs. New features are not driving much in the way of additional sales.

    Perhaps, "needs" but not what they want. Take for instance what most people like to play their music with: iTunes. On a PC it is a memory hog, is laggy and needs a lot of power to run correctly. Sure, most people don't "need" iTunes, Foobar2000 does a great job organizing music on Windows, VLC is great at playing music/videos, etc. but most people are familiar with and want to use iTunes. And what about video playback? And forget about gaming without a dedicated video card, etc.

    Plus, prices are still stagnant. Despite that generic Leveno netbooks have been out without a spec boost or anything for a year or two now, I don't see any real drop in prices. Bottom-end computers aren't getting any cheaper, despite them essentially doing less and less every year. I'd have no problem buying the Cr-48 if it cost less than a normal netbook (or heck, a bottom-end laptop!) if I'm going to be able to do less with it, the price needs to reflect it. I don't want to pay $300 for a netbook anymore, and if it is only in the "cloud" the price should be around $150 or so.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Not really... by Ephemeriis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Today, PCs are way overpowered for what 99% of the population needs. New features are not driving much in the way of additional sales.

      Perhaps, "needs" but not what they want. Take for instance what most people like to play their music with: iTunes. On a PC it is a memory hog, is laggy and needs a lot of power to run correctly. Sure, most people don't "need" iTunes, Foobar2000 does a great job organizing music on Windows, VLC is great at playing music/videos, etc. but most people are familiar with and want to use iTunes.

      Do they actually want to use iTunes? Or do they use it because it plays nice with their iPod, lets them buy music, and isn't horrifyingly complex? Would they maybe be happier if they could just use an iPod independently? If they could buy their music right on the iPod and never have to touch a computer for their music?

      It's been my experience that most people don't really want to use a computer at all... What they want to do is play music, or write a letter, or check their email, or whatever. They've got some task they want to accomplish. Some goal in mind. And right now those tasks typically involve a computer.

      But if you had a simple hardware appliance, like the iPod, that enabled them to do their task without ever touching a general-purpose computer? Most of them would be thrilled.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    2. Re:Not really... by Darkness404 · · Score: 2

      Most people don't want to learn anything, most people want to use the same thing that they were brought up using. The vast majority of people don't want to advance. And if you show them anything electronic that they aren't pressured in to using because of some outside force, they won't use it. How many older people only learned to use a computer because their boss was throwing away the typewriters and they were forced to use DOS? How many people would still be using DOS if it came pre-shipped on most computers and they used DOS at work? Heck, how many people would rather use XP (or earlier) than deal with Vista or 7? People don't want to learn to use new things unless they are pressured. If they wouldn't be looked down upon by others (and tapes were still sold in stores) how many people would still be using a Walkman? Etc. If they still sold the same phone, how many people do you think would would still be using a simple phone?

      I've tried switching people who weren't fans of Windows over to Linux and the vast majority switched back to Windows, why? Because it was different. People don't want to change unless some outside force makes them change. Unless there is a force preventing people from going back, or outside pressure to conform, the vast majority of people won't change.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:Not really... by beelsebob · · Score: 2

      Or do they use it because it plays nice with their iPod, lets them buy music, and isn't horrifyingly complex?

      Why are these not good reasons to want to use something? Playing music in a non-horrifyingly complex way is pretty much exactly what most people want!

      Would they maybe be happier if they could just use an iPod independently? If they could buy their music right on the iPod and never have to touch a computer for their music?

      They can. The music store is available on all iPod touches and iPhones, and doesn't need a computer to provide the music at all – of course it'll automatically back up for you when you plug in –another reason to want iTunes.

      But if you had a simple hardware appliance, like an iPod, that enabled them to do their task without ever touching a general-purpose computer? Most of them would be thrilled.

      Yep, that's yet another reason why iPods are so popular ;)

  11. Re:UTTER FAILURE by RobertM1968 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    NO CAPS LOCK KEY.

    Isn't this the second nail in the coffin for this thing recently?

    I DON'T KNOW, I NEVER USE MY CAPS LOCK KEY. WHAT'S IT FOR?

    Seriously though, except for programming/development, or for those who LOVE SHOUTING IN EVERY POST/MSG/ETC BECAUSE THEY DON'T KNOW BETTER (or those who still program in the original MS-DOS BASIC), I don't see it as a big problem.

    Heck, even for programmers (I often type those special "certain things" in ALL CAPS), I still find it easier to simply hold down the shift key (which is actually how I did the capitalized section above). Maybe it's all a matter of the keyboard, but I find on my Model M, it's very easy to hold shift with my pinky and type with the remaining fingers relatively normal.

  12. The "cloud" is worthless by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For most practical things, the "cloud" is worthless as a primary storage device. Yes the "cloud" can be useful for backing up data off-site as you noted with contacts with Android. There are some big drawbacks to the "cloud" though.

    A) Lack of access. There are many places where it is impossible to get any internet connection (or at least anything that you aren't paying out of the ass for), travel is the number one reason I use my laptop on the go. If I'm on a bus that doesn't have wi-fi on it, I have no internet. Yes, you can buy things through cell phone companies that let you use the internet, but they are expensive and now they are even eliminating unlimited data, giving you a tiny amount of usable data at a high price at low speeds.

    B) It is more expensive. For the price of two months of cell phone data service, you can get a decent 500 GB - 1 TB HDD. Yes, I know that hard drives fail, but assuming that they don't fail within 2 months of use, you are essentially saving money by storing your things locally and only using the "cloud" for backups on your home internet connection.

    C) It isn't secure. The "cloud" is only as secure as your trust for the person or company that has your data. It shouldn't surprise you that the companies who push the "cloud" as a revolution are the same people who make money off of mining your personal data? Sites like Google and Facebook. Now, I'm not saying that either of those sites is 100% untrustworthy, but still, their main source of income is through selling data to advertisers and selling ads. Not to mention that break-ins and the lack of data integrity is possible, not to mention the legal implications as governments have been known to plant evidence, add that plus a willing company and you have potential jail time for doing nothing wrong.

    D) Internet connections aren't uniform. Sure, in a big city or an affluent suburb fast, free, wi-fi is prevalent, with enough money you can buy a nearly lag-free 4G modem and use 4G for surfing the web and accessing the "cloud", but lets say you go to visit your obscure relatives for a family reunion in Middleofnowhere, Iowa. Suddenly, your 4G isn't going to work there, you might not get any service at all, and the house you are staying at has no internet beyond dial-up.


    Yes, eventually the "cloud" might change the world. But right now, you'd be foolish to buy into this Chrome OS hype.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  13. Color by ISoldat53 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why isn't it a silvery metallic color?

  14. storage devices, how odd... by hitmark · · Score: 2

    Iirc, earlier chromeos builds had storage devices show up as "tab" on the bottom of the screen. Much in the same way that they have IM sessions show up right now. I wonder if this proved to cumbersome for users once the devices started containing large numbers of files and directories.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  15. More the pity by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Out of the box, the Cr-48 conjures images of the Black Apple MacBook, from the plain, rubberized chassis to what looks like the same chiclet-style keyboard. The 12-inch notebook weighs about 3.8lbs and comes with a clickpad which recognizes one finger as a left click, while a two-finger tap triggers a right-click function.

    From what I've seen, the design of this prototype is quite nice and does conjure thoughts of other elegant notebook designs such as the MacBook or ThinkPad. However, by the time this thing reaches production it will be marred by horrible beveled designs in cheap plastic, substandard parts, and a plethora of ugly stickers announcing the system internals. I understand that the need to cut costs means that not every notebook can be visually pleasing to the eye, but is there such a need to make them ass ugly?

  16. chromium 48? by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    chromium 48 has a half life of 21.6 hours. so this laptop won't last very long

    give google time to do 4 version revisions, to chromium 52. that version is a stable isotope, i mean operating system

    wait, what?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  17. Shouldn't that be "CR-49"? by jamrock · · Score: 2

    I mean, isn't that the accepted leetspeak spelling for "crap"?

  18. Cr-Os by EnsilZah · · Score: 2

    Apparently the chromium-osmium alloy is pretty hard (thought I'm not sure about the exact applications) so that would be a nice name for a stable version.