Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Why Special Effects No Longer Impress

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the bored-now dept.

brumgrunt writes "When an advert for toilet roll now has a CG dog in it, have we come to the point where special effects have no lasting impact whatsoever? As Den of Geek argues, 'Where we once sat through Terminator 2 and gasped when Robert Patrick turned into a slippery blob of mercury, we now watch, say, Inception and simply acknowledge that, yes, the folding city looks quite realistic.'"

2 of 532 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Two words: Star Wars by swanzilla · · Score: 1, Informative

    Three words: Han shot first

    --
    0 = 1 + e^(Alt something)
  2. Forrest Gump by Stele · · Score: 4, Informative

    As others have pointed out, good stories seem much harder to come by these days.

    I think back fondly to Forrest Gump - a movie CHOCK FULL of "special effects", none of them "visible". Every one added something to the story or visual style of the movie in a totally realistic way.

    I think Transformers 2 finally confirmed for me that stuff blowing up wasn't enough. Why someone bothered to make The Expendables I have no idea.