Designer Arrested Over Anonymous Press Release
An anonymous reader writes "A Greek designer named Alex Tapanaris, whose name appeared on the PDF press release circulated by online trouble-makers Anonymous has had his web site disappeared and, according to reports, the unfortunate chap has been arrested. THINQ managed to talk to Alex on the phone, and while he wouldn't confirm his arrest, he 'certainly sounded spooked,' the web site reports. 'No comment,' he said and hung up. The press release sought to explain Anonymous's aims and lack of any formal organization. It explained that the Anonymous name is applied to a shifting roster of individuals who come together on an ad hoc basis, depending on individual concerns and practical, day-to-day matter such as who happens to be online at the time. Clicking on the document's properties revealed Tapanaris as its named author."
Is he charged with designing graphics? With sympathizing with an unsavory group? How the heck would that arrest warrant look? How is the creation of that document even something in the vicinity of a crime?
The worst possibility is to be stalked by legions of anti-wikileaks vigilantes.
This guys life may very well be ruined over this as now he's going to face the Greek version of COINTELPRO. Read about operation Gladio.
And because he's Greek the CIA, NSA and US Military can use full force on him. They don't even have to pretend to respect his human rights or civil rights like they would if he were an American. Extrajudicial justice from the vigilantes will be what he could face just by having associated himself with this sort of manifesto.
It's like having signed your name to the US Constitution or Communist Manifesto and somehow it leaks out and now they all know who you are and where you live.
Clicking on the document's properties revealed Tapanaris as its named author
Well that settles it then, because these computer people would never figure out that you could put the name of someone that you don't like in a document like this and cause them problems too while you are doing your original mischief.
I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
OK, all you did was find a cable from the U.S. Embassy in Honduras that reflects the position taken by the Obama Administration at the time that the Legislature and Supreme Court of Honduras got the Honduran Army to remove the President of Honduras (who just about everybody agrees was committing a crime defined by the Honduran Constitution at the time). It does not show that the Obama Administration lied or that it supported the "coup" government, since the Obama Administration opposed the coup government, even to the point of suggesting that they would not recognize the results of the previously scheduled election.
The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
Subversive revolutionaries are usually mistreated by the authorities in any country. Governments hate subversives.
With good reason. The goal of "subversive revolutionaries" is to create chaos and destruction, in order to make the government appear weak and ineffective. To say that "governments hate subversive revolutionaries" is no more poignant than to say that teachers hate the kid at the back of the class who keeps putting tacks on their seats and shooting spitballs at them when their backs are turned.
As for the public in general, the problem with "subversive revolutionaries" is that they're usually no better - and sometimes far worse - than the regimes which they seek to depose, and that - even in the cases where the previous does not hold true - the act of overthrowing an entire government often leads to far more death and misery than was present under the existing system. Cuba is an excellent case-study; the government of Fulgencio Batista was corrupt and oppressive, but his overthrow lead to thousands of deaths and hundreds of thousands of deportations, while resulting in a government which was even more corrupt, oppressive, and ruthless. Batista had every reason to hate Castro and Guevara, and Cuba would arguably have been far better off had they not succeeded.
They seem to have forgotten the real reason for noblesse oblige, which is basically that we will kill you if you push us too far.
What do you mean by "we", peasant?
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.