Slashdot Mirror


MakerBot Thing-o-Matic 3D Printer Assembly, In Pictures

ConMotto writes "After an estimated 16 man-hour assembly effort, these are some of the first high-quality user photographs of the Thing-o-Matic 3D printer and completed component assemblies, released December, 2010 by MakerBot. The Thing-o-Matic is a commercial-supported open source 3D printer (similar to the RepRap), allowing hardware hackers to print their own 3D objects out of Lego-like plastic."

25 of 105 comments (clear)

  1. I wish I had more spare time in my life by oldspewey · · Score: 2

    This is the kind of thing that makes me wish I were unemployed, or retired, or at a different phase in my life when I just plain had more free time to play with cool shit.

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  2. I wish Slashdot would mirror these. by NixieBunny · · Score: 2

    'Cuz they know the server will collapse within minutes.

    --
    The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    1. Re:I wish Slashdot would mirror these. by Zerth · · Score: 2
  3. stargate replicators but not evil by wizardforce · · Score: 2

    Too bad none of those 3d printers can print a copy of themselves. Create one that does and is programmable and uses genetic algorithms and you've created the first form of synthetic "life." More sophisticated ones can become the basis of an entirely new kind of economy.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:stargate replicators but not evil by MrQuacker · · Score: 2

      You don't need to be made out of metal to want to terminate humanity.....

    2. Re:stargate replicators but not evil by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Informative

      They both have a strict purpose of making replicating them easy.
      They can't print their own PCBs. They can't place and solder their components. They can't make their own stepper motors or even create the construction metal bars. But they were made with a specific ability in mind: to be able to print any custom part of themselves, and for the rest of the parts to be off-the-shelf commodities or doable by common low-difficulty DIY techniques requiring no advanced tools.

      It's 16h assembly of off-the-shelf parts and parts printed by the device. No milling, stamping, welding or anything like that. Making and soldering the PCBs is the most difficult, and the hot plastic dispenser/noozle is the only part hard to obtain "off the shelf" and not printable itself.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    3. Re:stargate replicators but not evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hm, it is a stated goal for the reprap to make printers that can print most of their own parts. They have sometimes gone to great lengths to try to achieve this (for example, they have tried but given up on creating proper bearings in plastic). But like all "life", it needs extra parts ("vitamins"). Some things you just have to get somewhere. Humans need a few different kinds of food for example. But a big part of a reprap can in fact be printed on a reprap.

  4. Men and Boys by cstec · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The assembly process is intense, to put it lightly. Instructions are generally correct and straightforward 90% of the time, but given the intimidating complexity of the project, insane number of parts and dexterity required for some of the assemblies, simply locating the correct widget can sometimes be challenging. As the online assembly guide progresses, the instructions increasingly rely on your prior knowledge of repetitious concepts. We’re talking sanding, soldering, cutting, punching, scrubbing, gluing, and screwing hundreds of bolt/nut combinations. Only attempt this project if you’re the type of person that wakes up with ideas on the order of, “I think I’ll build an air conditioner this weekend.”, and actually completes the task. Like I said: intense.

    Awesome! Damm this post is going to cost me a ton of time.

  5. Flickr photos (not slashdottable) by NixieBunny · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    1. Re:Flickr photos (not slashdottable) by ConMotto · · Score: 2

      http://www.flickr.com/photos/prestonlee/sets/72157625613518344/show/

      Hi everyone.. thanks for taking down the server every 20 seconds. :) In the meantime, you can take a look at the photos on Flickr (sans some commentary). Please keep it open in a browser tab and check back later. At the moment there is so much traffic I can't even log in.

    2. Re:Flickr photos (not slashdottable) by Splab · · Score: 2

      In the future, stop playing with aperture on your camera for build projects. Generally people want to take in the whole scene in these cases and it is to be honest quite annoying when only part of it is in focus.

      For portraits etc. playing with depth of field is really good - not so much for documenting.

  6. Direct Link to Preston's Flickr Set... by cutecub · · Score: 2

    ... is here. (Pretty Sure.)

    "Here's a quarter, kid. Buy yourself a decent server."
    -Sean

  7. Does it leverage other open hardware? by benjamindees · · Score: 2

    I really love to see these types of projects using other open hardware, such as the Arduino. I cringe whenever I see some simple project that requires a bunch of custom electronics. I mean, in the software world, it doesn't really matter if you want to waste time creating yet-another-library for your app. But in meatspace, people can only afford to have so many little pieces of custom electronics and your motor controller probably doesn't justify a completely custom circuit.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    1. Re:Does it leverage other open hardware? by pantherace · · Score: 3, Informative

      Having made a mostly arduino controlled mill that works, but needs work to correct some wobble (structure problem). I can tell you that even with the current set of shields, there isn't one that works out of the box. I had to modify the bipolar stepper on this page: http://www.tigoe.net/pcomp/code/circuits/motors/stepper-motors, to also accept an enable/disable. That's in addition to an Adafruit motor shield (which was when I was doing research on them, far and away the best). Both of which used two stacked chips in place of one.

      So not *completely* custom, but it does need at least a modified circuit. Take another 5 people with slightly different knowledge and such, and you'd likely get different solutions, simply because there isn't one I've found which would work without modification. Even using a stock Adafruit motor shield, where you could power 4 DC motors, adding encoders to those would require custom work.

      Multiple Arduinos wouldn't work well, as the inter-microcontroller communications are slow. I2C is limited to 400kbps, Serial was eliminated in my case (required to talk to the computer), and SPI might be fast enough, but at the time, there were only software implementations, which were slow. Arduino 0019 introduced a hardware library, so it may work now. (However, it wouldn't work with the shield noted above, as it uses pins 11 and 12)

      Anything even mildly complicated probably requires it's own setup.

  8. Re:Making a replicator by morty_vikka · · Score: 2

    It just needs to be made entirely out of materials that are available to it. I don't think metal would be easy to come by for a machine like this. Or plastic, for that matter. The mining/manufacturing process is too difficult.

    People get freaked out by the idea of replicators, but what the hell are WE? Or any life form, for that matter? The simplest ones can survive on light or heat or chemical energy alone, and as long as there is energy and a few new necessary building blocks about (C, O, N etc in various forms) a lot of types of bacteria will happily replicate indefinitely!!

    All this grey goo and nanotech rubbish is pure paranoia! It has already happened! It's life, dammit!

  9. free download for Cory Doctorow's "Makers" by waterwingz · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've got mod points tonight but I'm going to post instead. Take a look at this link http://craphound.com/makers/ for an interesting scifi spin on what the OP is thinking about. Free download available - its a good read.

    --
    . waterwingz
  10. Shameless plug. by MrQuacker · · Score: 2
    Seeing as we are on the topic of DIY fabrication, and I have karma to spare...

    For those that want to make chainmail, (the metal stuff knights wore) I make and sell a very cool tool for that:

    http://www.ringinator.com/

  11. Re:Milling Accessory by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2

    Now if somebody could create a precise 3D milling machine that would trim that thing to precise tolerances . . . NOW that would be something!

    If you had a precise 3D milling machine, you could replace many of the functions of a 3D printer.

    They're basically the same thing; one adds material that looks like a chess piece, the other removes material that doesn't look like a chess piece.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  12. In fact, I did build a heat pump one weekend... by Powercntrl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unless you work in HVAC, then it's like rocket science... Unless you're a rocket scientist, in which case it's like brain surgery... Unless you're a brain surgeon, etc...

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  13. Re:Milling Accessory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    "In the 1980s there was a popular series of books on how to make a very simple low budget foundry, how to use that to make the basics of a lathe, how to use that lathe to improve parts and make it a better lathe and how to use that to make a two axis milling machine.
    Anybody remember those and the author or titles?"

    http://www.lindsaybks.com/

    The Dave Gingery book set.

  14. No 2D printer can be called a 2D printer... by manicb · · Score: 2

    ...until it is able to print with any arbitrary material. Oh wait, yes it can, because "number of dimensions" and "materials of construction" have NO CONNECTION.

  15. Re:Milling Accessory by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

    A 3d printer produces prototypes out of many little dabs of plastic.

    Those prototypes won't be nearly as strong as the same thing cut out of a single piece of plastic (or Injection molded).

    That said there are many things that are impossible to machine that can be made by this category of machines.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  16. Re:Poor replication plan by SharpFang · · Score: 2

    The problem with CNC is they are all 2.5d which all too often is a showstopper.

    These 3D printers can do real 3D printouts even with fully overhanging pieces, with little help: they first print a "scaffolding" from an easily-removable material, then print actual part on top of that with final material, then you remove the "scaffolding" by heating, washing with a solvent or even just breaking it off.

    (still, as I look at the resolution, I'm not very impressed. The UV-hardening resin 3D printer made of an LCD display between a tub of the resin and an UV lamp seemed much more subtle and precise, and likely faster too (printing a whole layer at once instead of just a point). And yep, it could print real 3D too, display gray area on the LCD, making the resin stick but not harden for "scaffolding" bit that can be removed by strong water jet).

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  17. Re:Milling Accessory by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 2

    CNC mills cannot cut internal structures.

    This is a task for which a 3d printer shines.

    --


    "Lame" - Galaxar