Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft, Apple, EMC, and Oracle Form Patent Bloc

An anonymous reader writes "When Novell finally sold itself, part of the deal included the sale of 882 patents to a consortium backed by Microsoft. Thanks to a tip from Florian Mueller, it turns out that Microsoft's partners are Apple, Oracle, and EMC, which raises questions about where these companies are heading and what it means for the rest of the industry."

11 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    SOVIET PATENT BLOC LOLOL

  2. Ahh... by itsownreward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...the axis of evil.

  3. What it means by MikeRT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is that it's going to get a little bit harder to run a new business that makes computer products.

    I don't think there's anything we can do about this. The general sentiment is that patents make the market "fair" by "protecting inventors." The American people care more about a "fair market" than a "free market" today. If you suggest that no one has a right to make money from their ideas, only their actual products, you're seen as a cold-hearted bastard in the mold of Randroid who believes cigar-chomping fatcats should be able to keep guys working on The Next Big Thing in their garage from getting rich by stealing their ideas.

    Nevermind the fact that more often than not, what the patent system really means is that the cigar-chomping fatcat can sue the guy in his garage into bankruptcy 100 times over before he can get his product to market.

    1. Re:What it means by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The big problem is that the tech industry moves so much faster than most other industries. By the time a patent on something has expired, it's likely fallen out of use or has been supplanted by something else. Either that or its a patent that covers something so vague that it can be applied to almost any product and it takes forever (by tech industry standards) for it to expire.

      There's also a horrible feedback loop because a few people have been burned by patent suits over asinine patents. To prevent this, companies patent everything and anything just so they can avoid patent trolls. If the company starts to go belly up it can bust out its patent portfolio and become a patent troll itself and the vicious circle goes around once more.

      I think that most of the /. community would agree that a patent system is a good thing, but that what we have now is horribly broken and badly in need of being fixed. Of course that's easier said than done.

    2. Re:What it means by metrometro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      just license the patents.

      ...and when Apple decides to compete with your new product, they will simply stop licensing to your company to shut you down. Remember Lala.com? Me neither.

  4. What do all these companies have in common? by NotInfinitumLabs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're all involved with litigation against Google (or Google products, like Android).

  5. More interesting is who's not on the list by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More interesting than the companies on the list is the company who isn't: Google.

    Strange that almost everyone involved in the consortium has some kind of axe to grind with Google. Both Apple and Microsoft have been involved in lawsuits with phone manufacturers who make Android devices and Oracle is suing Google over their JVM. EMC has fingers in several pies and some of those pies are ones that Google could conceivably want to sink fingers into as well so it's not inconceivable that they might target Google in the near future.

    Could just be a group of companies looking to ward off patent trolls, but I foresee that one or more of these companies will be bringing one or more of these newly acquired patents into the fray before too long.

  6. Re:Any doubt about their intent? by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft knew that they wouldn't win in court. They just made up a number that sounded scary and started making noise. Some good old-fashioned FUD-slinging. The worst they can do is appear menacing and make it appear there's a sword hanging over the head of Linux.

    Even if they could somehow "own" Linux, it wouldn't stop the FOSS community from removing the offending parts and moving something new that can't be shutdown.

  7. Re:Maybe not to court by molnarcs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They probably just don't want to worry about getting sued.

    I think I heard that line before... And then APPLE went after HTC waving ridiculous software patents, while their buddies at Microsoft covered the other big player: Motorola. Oracle is attacking Google directly...

  8. The Corpocracy must defend itself by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Meanwhile, somewhere in near the future...

    - War Is Peace
    - Freedom Is Slavery
    - Ignorance Is Strength
    - Monopoly Is Competition
    - Fools Are Wise
    - Drugs Are Health
    - Torvalds Is Goldstein
    - Assange Is An Unlawful Informant

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  9. Cats sleeping wtih Dogs... by AntEater · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...which raises questions about where these companies are heading and what it means for the rest of the industry.

    Total. World. Domination.

    --
    Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....