Slashdot Mirror


Judge Ends Massive Porn Lawsuit

eldavojohn writes "A recent offensive of porn producers using copyright law against many anonymous P2P users has been terminated by a West Virginian judge. Initially, Ken Ford of Adult Copyright Company planned out nine lawsuits against some 22,000 file sharers, starting with 7,000-person and 9,000-person suits in the first wave. Unimpressed, the judge reduced everything down to one lawsuit against one file sharer, telling the Adult Copyright Company that they are to prosecute each individual separately, as the accused neither participated in the same transaction nor collaborated in these offenses. So, if you're looking to hit 22,000 people with such a lawsuit, the $350 court filing fee will require an investment of $7.7 million ($1.8 million for the individuals listed so far). Ars points out the hilarious fact that 'Ford has sued enough people that lawyers are taking out ads on his company name,' providing an image of an advertisement for such a search. This is separate from a similar showdown in US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois."

4 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. Stiff Competition by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The fact is that the real downfall of the porn industry isn't illegal file sharers, it's the fact that there appear to be a growing number of amateur exhibitionists willing to do filthy things to each other for discount prices, or in some cases for free. Mom and pop (and various other combinations) porn films are kicking the crap out of "mainstream" porn, because the Internet, that great leveler, has given this new wave of pornographers a cheap and universal distribution mechanism.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  2. So Hollywood can do it but not the porn people ? by bobjr94 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seems somewhat biased the riaa and other lawyer heavy companies can send out millions of lawsuits but when it comes to the porn companies it's different. What does that do for all the other mass lawsuits that have been or will be sent to other downloaders ?

  3. Huh? by thethibs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ford has sued enough people that lawyers are taking out ads on his company name,' providing an image of an advertisement for such a search.

    What the hell does that mean? The words are english, but...

    --
    I'm a Programmer. That's one level above Software Engineer and one level below Engineer.
  4. Re:Massive Copyright Infringements and the Law by bwayne314 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Umm according to your link, the artists are actually making MORE now:

    The decline in Recorded Revenue (To artists) from 2004-2008 is 152,500-111,750=40,750 thousand pound decrease.
    The increase in Live Revenue (To artists) from 2004-2008 is 650,880-382,320= 268,560 thousand pounds.

    This yields a net increase of 227,810,000 pounds to artist revenue from 2004 to 2008.

    Yea Labels are making less money (still as much as the artists though), but fuck them, the internet has turned them into a vestigial leech. In a world where "David After Dentist" can land millions of hits for free, a talented individual can/should stand alone.