Slashdot Mirror


Nigerian Email Scam Victim Sues Bank, Loses Appeal

reidhellyer writes "From California Litigation Attorney Blog: 'While many victims of the so-called "Nigerian e-mail scam" would be too embarrassed to trumpet that fact, others end up infamous for their victimhood like the appellant in a published opinion of the California Court of Appeal in Riverside. In March 2009, Charles Peters received an email from someone purporting to be a citizen of Malaysia. The e-mail informed Peters that certain third parties in the United States and Canada owed the Malaysian money, but that “they can not transfer the funds to any bank account outside America continent due to their new company policy [sic].” He asked Peters to “assist me in receiving the funds and forward to me.” He offered to pay Peters 12 percent of the money. Peters agreed after apparently negotiating an increase of his fee to 15 percent.'"

1 of 312 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Duh... by St.Creed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Heh.

    We use the same system in The Netherlands. Checks are completely antiquated ofcourse. But you know what? International bank traffic can have the ability to revoke wire transfers as well. So one day the money is in your account and you hand over the carkeys. The next day the car is gone to Poland or Russia and a week later, the wire transfer is cancelled. And if you already spent that money on a new car, the bank will happily put your account in the red with a 19% yearly interest rate attached.

    Don't think that wire transfers from dubious banks in Russia or Africa are much better than checks. You could get a very nasty surprise that way.

    --
    Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)