FBI Defend Raids On Texas Datacenter
Aryden writes "Wired Reports: 'The FBI on Tuesday defended its raids on at least two data centers in Texas, in which agents carted out equipment and disrupted service to hundreds of businesses. The raids were part of an investigation prompted by complaints from AT&T and Verizon about unpaid bills allegedly owed by some data center customers, according to court records. One data center owner charges that the telecoms are using the FBI to collect debts that should be resolved in civil court. But on Tuesday, an FBI spokesman disputed that charge.'"
I know Slashdot is sometimes slow to report on news, but come on...
I guess that's what they call it when somebody brings the state library's book back.
Hey, I live in Texas. I know for a fact we have more than just one library book. (I would give you an exact figure, but our math teachers aren't allowed to teach us numbers that big!)
If I had to guess I'd say more than 665...
This was not recent. This was not a debt collection, either.
The guy's stuff wasn't grabbed by the FBI because he didn't pay his bills.
The guy's stuff was grabbed because he never intended to pay his bills himself, and he committed fraud in order to get the colocation space and bandwidth in the first place.
The guy got credit references from people who didn't exist. He forged receipts from other telecom companies. He altered documents to show he'd paid bills that other people had paid. He used a maze of twisty little business names, all different.
He did all of that to secure credit from these folks to allow him to start service with them without a hefty deposit. Then he ditched the bills like they would have expected he might had he not forged the credit-worthiness paperwork.
Fraud is not simple insolvency. It is a felony.
There was every reason for this to be investigated and prosecuted as a criminal offense.
There was also every reason for it to be newsworthy last year when it was news.
I guess that's what they call it when somebody brings the state library's book back.
If I had to guess I'd say more than 665...
Why else would they need a book depository?
http://michaelsmith.id.au
Found a clean copy of the text; have restored the embedded links here: