Slashdot Mirror


The Animal World Has Its Junkies, Too

Phoghat writes "Research scientists have used many animal species in investigating mind-altering drugs, but it may come as a surprise to learn that animals in the wild — from starlings to reindeer — also make use of psychoactive substances of their own accord. It seems that many of these species have a natural desire to experience altered states of consciousness, and man may well have found his way to some of his favourite recreational drugs by observing the behaviour of animals."

4 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. Oh, not that one again... by Balinares · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > States of WHAT? Animals have consciousness now?

    No, it popped up MAGICALLY in us apes at some point; someone throw on a switch and BAM, consciousness overnight. MAGIC, I tell you.

    Or, you know, maybe consciousness is not a binary variable, but, like most everything about the real world, a continuum, and like most things about the real world, various species have achieved various levels of it? You know? Just sayin'.

    --

    -- B.
    This sig does in fact not have the property it claims not to have.
  2. Psychoactive users are not junkies by vandan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a common perception ... and totally wrong ... that psychoactive users are junkies. Far from it. I have participated in multiple voluntary studies with the Australian National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, where they study recreational drugs ( E, LSD, etc ) ... and have asked them each time what they thought of my habits, and that of my peers. Each time they said the same thing ... that it was a pleasure to work with people who actually had their life together ... that the real 'junkies' use heroin, alcohol, cocain, etc ... and the recreational drug users, in contrast, are well in control of their activities, and leading productive lives. In fact I would go a step further and say that psychoactive drug users have their life together far more than the average person.

  3. Re:Tell that to to judge ;-) by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It wasn't that somebody just decided "You know, we should just not have fun!", but there are reasons why these things are considered bad.

    And most of them revolve around "that's something the tribe over the hill does, not something we do." Opium is something the heathen Chinese use, and marihuana is for Mexicans and for (gasp!) jazz musicians; us white folks drink whiskey. Taboos are an irrational social phenomenon, not the result of reasoned consideration of the effects of various behaviors.

    I'm surprised that this article is being presented as news. Animal drug-seeking behavior has been know about for a long time. Psychopharmacologist Ronald K. Siegel wrote an excellent book about it over twenty years ago.

    Sex, for instance, is perfectly fine within the lifelong bond of marriage

    And it's also perfectly fine outside of it.

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  4. Re:Hypothetical Article by mikael_j · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Then, I guess he is not so proud of using drugs, now is he?

    I don't think he/she stated that he/she was "proud" of his/her drug use, but even if the parent poster is proud or in no way feels guilty about his/her prior drug use that doesn't mean that it is without consequence to publicly state this fact.

    There are plenty of people out there who would be happy to force someone who has not used drugs for years into rehab, or have them fired because "we don't hire druggies". That's not to mention just generally being viewed with suspicion by your peers. And if you have kids and social services find out about any prior drug use (not counting severe alcoholism though) they're very likely to put your kids in foster care (at least around here). Oh, and if you are divorced with shared custody you can bet your former spouse will use any and all drug use in the past as an excuse to get full custody of the kids.

    "Free speech" doesn't mean "Free speech as long as you reveal your identity up front".

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4