Slashdot Mirror


Security Researcher Finds Hundreds of Browser Bugs

An anonymous reader writes "PC Magazine reports on a very understated late night post to the full-disclosure mailing list, in which security researcher Michael Zalewski shared a fuzzing tool reportedly capable of identifying over a hundred browser bugs. Some of these bugs, he says, may be already known to third parties in China. The report also includes an account of how browser vendors fared fixing these flaws so far. Not surprisingly, Microsoft's response timeline appears depressing."

4 of 145 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Pass the salt please by MathFox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It depends on the exact bug that is triggered. When a security researcher mentions "potentially exploitable bug" it could be serious. Very often a memory corruption is a first step into more serious exploits.

    --
    extern warranty;
    main()
    {
    (void)warranty;
    }
  2. Hard to get reproducible results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FTFA: The design of the fuzzer makes it unexpectedly difficult to get clean,
    deterministic repros; to that effect, in the current versions of all the
    affected browsers, we are still seeing a collection of elusive problems when
    running the tool - and some not-so-elusive ones.

    This might help explain at least part of the difficult communication with Microsoft.

    1. Re:Hard to get reproducible results by Stratoukos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This might help explain at least part of the difficult communication with Microsoft.

      But not Mozilla, the Webkit team and Opera?

      --
      It may be 7 digits, but at least it's a semiprime
  3. Re:Terrific Research, But... by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why do companies still use MS [Internet] Explorer?

    Momentum. A browser in operation tends to stay in operation unless acted upon by an outside IT consultant.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.