Slashdot Mirror


French Minister Sells Surveillance Legislation With Fake Benefits

Dangerous_Minds writes "The debate over LOPPSI 2, the legislation that would allow police to upload malware including Trojan Horses and key loggers to unwitting users without a court order, is heating up in France. Interior minister Brice Hortefeux told the media that LOPPSI 2 would stop the theft of smart phones because vendors would then be able to discontinue use of on-board SIM cards. Critics are pointing out that the theft of stolen portable phones is not covered under LOPPSI 2 in its current form. Others also point out that the discontinued use of SIM cards on stolen phones is already possible in France without the legislation. It's unclear if this is just a case of the minister not knowing what is actually in the legislation he is trying to pass."

51 comments

  1. Rudakrus by oldhack · · Score: 0

    That's inconceivable.

    I have no idea what the fuck this is about.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:Rudakrus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For having met those guys face to face a couple of years ago, I can tell you that this law (allowing police to upload malware including Trojan Horses and key loggers on any user's machine without a court order) is here merely to make existing practices become official rather than clandestine.

      When the volume of clandestine (unlawful) visits reaches some levels, it is statistically unlikley that it will stay clandestine. Therefore, they need a way to make it legal.

  2. Do politicians ever understand by Ismellpoop · · Score: 2

    legislation they push?
    Or are the police possibly some other special interest groups pushing it?
    Politicians are yes men plain and simple.

    1. Re:Do politicians ever understand by bersl2 · · Score: 2

      They're mostly authoritarians too, just like political executives. I'm sure he knows exactly what he's doing.

    2. Re:Do politicians ever understand by Kilrah_il · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, it's quite sad that the option that the politician does not know what he is trying to pass is concievable. You would think that a professional would be well versed in the material he is working on. In the case of politicians (which are supposed to be our professional law-makers), we assume he does not have more than a passing aquaintance with the laws he is proposing. And the alternative is that he is blanatly lying. Amazing!
      Well, I must be new here... :)

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    3. Re:Do politicians ever understand by arivanov · · Score: 2

      The problem is not so much with politicians. It is not the job of the politicos to be technically literate in every area of the human knowledge.

      The problem is mostly with people who advise them. These are the actual technically illiterate "yes men" in this and many other cases.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    4. Re:Do politicians ever understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's obviously both.

  3. French minister Brice Hortefeux just lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Brice Hortefeux is well known for not knowing what he is talking about and lying about facts on a daily basis.
    Note that he has been judged and condemned twice in the recent months (racism and presumption of innocence) so his lack of moral is not only notorious, it is also official.

    1. Re:French minister Brice Hortefeux just lies by PatPending · · Score: 1

      Brice Hortefeux is well known for not knowing what he is talking about and lying about facts on a daily basis.

      Applies to others as well. Here is the link to The Dissident Frogman's take on French news agency AFP.com. Or go directly to the hysterically funny, good-natured videotaped farce he performed for the occasion.

      In summary:

      We can live with a dishonest press -- as long as we know it -- but ignorance from those who pretend to inform us?

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    2. Re:French minister Brice Hortefeux just lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another part of this law allows the goverment to block any website without any court decision. This law is advertised to be aimed at pedopornographical websites but there are no appeal procedure or plea. (This law will certainly not pass the constitutional court)
      Another blocking procedure apply to gambling site which aren't paying taxes in France (but with a trial)
      The same government also thougt about DPI to "prevent piracy".
      I think their goal is to control much more the Internet.

    3. Re:French minister Brice Hortefeux just lies by daem0n1x · · Score: 2

      Don't you French impeach politicians when they're convicted? Or, at the very least, pressure them to resign?

    4. Re:French minister Brice Hortefeux just lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we just reelect them when their sentence is served.

    5. Re:French minister Brice Hortefeux just lies by horza · · Score: 2

      Hardly. The current Minister for Defence Alain Juppé has been convicted for fraud whilst holding public office 2004. The fact that the French elite is riddled with corruption (Sarkozy, Chirac, Mitterand were all mired in fraud scandals) is why corruption is seen as ok.

      Phillip.

  4. Copycats by vuke69 · · Score: 1

    "It's unclear if this is just a case of the minister not knowing what is actually in the legislation he is trying to pass."

    Is he trying to copy American legislators?

    --
    Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. ~ Douglas Adams
  5. I miss the old country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brice Hortefeux is well known for not knowing what he is talking about and lying about facts on a daily basis.

    This guy is retarded, but on top of that he lies. One or the other I can stand, but being both retarded a lying is a feat that the USA wasn't been able to accomplish until George W Bush and his successors.

    Note that he has been judged and condemned twice in the recent months (racism and presumption of innocence) so his lack of moral is not only notorious, it is also official.

    This lying retard has also been condemned twice for racism and slandar.

    Bravo, lying idiot - you the only person in the world who is retarded and still somehow capable of slander. I guess racism just comes naturally to the guy too. I'm sure the Tea Party is recruiting this lying idiot as we speak.

    1. Re:I miss the old country... by bat21 · · Score: 1

      You're right, now instead of retarded and lying we have a president that's brilliant and lies.... Personally, I'll take the retard.

    2. Re:I miss the old country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, now instead of retarded and lying we have a president that's brilliant and lies.... Personally, I'll take the retard.

      Umm, where's the actual evidence of Obama's purported brilliance?

  6. Allow me to be very clear here... by Noryungi · · Score: 4, Informative

    The current French government has proposed, in the recent past, to track down migrants, both legal and illegal, through genetic testing.

    This is a government which was one of the very first to propose a "three strikes and you are out" regulation to "fight" so-called Internet piracy. Even though it was repeatedly told this was an unpopular measure and one that was pretty much unfeasible technically.

    This is a governement whose minister in charge of the "three strikes" law actually mentioned that Linux was not concerned by music or movie piracy because it had "high performance firewalls" [sic] such as "Open Office" [!!].

    Coming from that government, nothing surprises me anymore. Like many politicians, all you need to know is that they are lying every time they open their mouths and that whatever they say they will do, they probably won't.

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:Allow me to be very clear here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mentioned that Linux was not concerned by music or movie piracy because it had "high performance firewalls" [sic] such as "Open Office" [!!].

      Got a source for that?

    2. Re:Allow me to be very clear here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heil Frankrike!

    3. Re:Allow me to be very clear here... by Noryungi · · Score: 2

      Yes, my dear A.C.: just google "morano linux hadopi open office" and enjoy the links.

      Of course, it requires a minimum of knowledge of the french language. Once again, Google (Translate) is your friend.

      --
      The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    4. Re:Allow me to be very clear here... by eulernet · · Score: 1

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F011hLZHZrM

      Automatic subtitles may be available.

    5. Re:Allow me to be very clear here... by mouf · · Score: 1

      Well, here in France, the "open-office firewall" is becoming a real meme. And here is the source: http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12508-albanel-le-ministere-de-la-culture-a-comme-pare-feu-open-office-maj.html You can even see the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ph6ZeEDnFmc Both links are in French, but Google Translate will help you :) To be fair, it's been 1 year since this ministry has been replaced, but it is unsure the one in place knows any better about IT.

    6. Re:Allow me to be very clear here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.wzdftpd.net/blog/index.php?post/2010/06/16/46-le-pare-feu-openoffice

      The current Culture ministrer (Albanel's replacement; former President's nephew if you wonder why the name seems vaguely familiar) bragged about raping Thai boys in the arse, in a published book. Yeah, he later said it was just fantasies, but he made damn sure it looked like a legit autobiography before the scandal erupted

      The OO firewall has actually seen an implementation after Albanel's stupid speech: https://www.wzdftpd.net/blog/index.php?post/2010/06/16/46-le-pare-feu-openoffice -- just laugh at the architecture diagram :)

      Meanwhile we get drowned under omnibus rider legislation. I want to see an implementation of Linux kernel's Coccinelle for French legalese! This might help clean up the mess.

      Or not; we're a fascist state with no expectation of privacy anymore. Let's all get over it and hand the keys to Zuck's police buddies.

    7. Re:Allow me to be very clear here... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Why did Nick Clegg cross the road?

      Because he said he wouldn't.

    8. Re:Allow me to be very clear here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you there in France, the next time you have general elections, remember HADOPI and LOPSSI and vote accordingly. People complain and complain but they still vote for same-old, same-old. If you want change, you're going to have to take a chance with something-new (whatever that may be).

  7. Incompetence FTW! by serutan · · Score: 1

    It's unclear if this is just a case of the minister not knowing what is actually in the legislation he is trying to pass.

    Silly rabbit! If France is anything like the USA, having to actually read what his corporate sponsors email him before he cuts and pastes it into law would waste valuable schmoozing time.

    1. Re:Incompetence FTW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, hortefeux is actually a convicted racist and the law he pushes are aimed at the control of Internet, not for corporate power, but mostly to try to ensure a reelection for his boss, sarkozy.

      France is turning into a fascist state -- but that is the case for quite a lot of countries, these days...

    2. Re:Incompetence FTW! by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      I fear you might be on to something. Friends in different places in the world are complaining that politics (and more importantly, public opinion) in the countries they're living in is creeping steadily to the right. Same in my home country and in the country I'm currently living in. Wonder where this will end...

  8. not uncommon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it's not like the current government is known for its bullet-proofs arguments when it comes to defend their texts...
    Especially those whose goal is to reinforce the police's powers.

    Not that it really matters, the right wing have absolute majority and can pass every last dumb idea they have.

  9. "uploading malware" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is why I maintain a 100% strict policy that I, and only I, decide what runs on my computer.

    It's also a reason why I will never own a computer that I do not own. That means no iPads, no iPhones, no Kindles, and a ton of others.

    I take whatever technical steps are necessary for my computer to obey me and only me. Of course, someone with physical access could compromise it, but that means they have to have broken into my house, which isn't feasible on a wide scale. And someone could, in theory, compromise the OSS operating system I use, but it seems unlikely France has done that.

    Unfortunately, my policy means more and more cool modern consumer devices are off limits to purchase, because I don't get to own them after purchase.

    1. Re:"uploading malware" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but that means they have to have broken into my house

      That's easy to counter:
      - full system encryption
      - anti-temper seals/stickers to detect installation of hardware keyloggers and the likes
      - if you're really concerned, add video surveillance of your computer

    2. Re:"uploading malware" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - anti-temper seals/stickers

      anti-tamper ? Or is it that you get a temper when i install key-loggers in your system ? :)

  10. french &politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The truth is French Politics were on the side of Hitler in WWII, not so much much against the jews as much as just admiration for fascism and totalitarian state power structure napoleon( the short)....
    as usual lesson givers they want to be the first fascist state on the internet , and as usual they missed the first place taken by china.

    1. Re:french &politics by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most politicians around the world admired the fascists before WWII. The majority never really got over it, they just knew that they couldn't admit it after war broke out.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:french &politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah! and how 'bout how they always surrender! hahahahahahahaha! and their hairy women! hahahahahaha!

  11. Sometimes... by Rhaban · · Score: 1

    I hate my country.

  12. No incompetence there. by Mauvaisours · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is the same law that creates a blacklist of sites that must be blocked by ISPs, the list being secret, created by the interior minister, no appeal, no review.... And they claim it will stop pedo-pornography. They DO know what they're doing, they're just lying as usual.

    1. Re:No incompetence there. by jimicus · · Score: 2

      They DO know what they're doing, they're just lying as usual

      AFAICT, this is SOP for most western governments in the world today.

      It wouldn't surprise me if it had been SOP for most of the last couple of centuries, only now with things like the Internet it's becoming rather easier to spot.

    2. Re:No incompetence there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just how long do you think that list will *remain* secret, given as every mom'n'pop ISP has to have access to the list?

      AC

  13. Bad summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The summary is incorrect: installing a key logger and/or a piece of software to access the contents of the screen of the user REQUIRES A COURT ORDER in the LOPPSI 2 and can only be done for a limited amount of time set in the law.

    Please don't exaggerate things for the purpose of sensationalism. There are other points about this law that deserve constructive criticism not FUD.

    1. Re:Bad summary by uncle+slacky · · Score: 2

      What's the betting that the keylogger and screengrabber only work in Windows anyway?

      Of course, if you run Linux you'll be automatically assumed to be a terrorist...

      --
      Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it.
    2. Re:Bad summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the betting that the keylogger and screengrabber only work in Windows anyway?

      Of course, if you run Linux you'll be automatically assumed to be a terrorist...

      I think you underestimate the amount of resources that a national governement has at it's disposal. Especially one that manages the 5th largest economy of the world.

  14. Or maybe like a shady used car salesman... by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    ... the minister knowing exactly what he's trying to sell and hoping nobody will notice?

  15. He has a Nigerian Cousin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that keeps emailing me about the money bla bla bla bla bla and oh yeah sir, mighty fine looking bird sir, nice plumage, sir!
    They can be seen in action here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juLHmMRgjzM

  16. i feel safe by nopainogain · · Score: 1

    the cops around here, noble guys as they may be. cannot differentiate their mouse and keyboard. They paid for half my beer money when I was in college by downloading every type of crap imaginable and hiring me to repair/remove it.

  17. duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's inconceivable.

    I don't think that word mean what you think it mean.

  18. How likely is this to become law, exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That some people are totally insane does not surprise me. That a large percentage of the people in the various western governments seem to fit that bill has occured to me more than once.

    howeer, regarding this proposal for a law, the interesting question must be: How significant is it? Is it likely to get accepted in parliament or what kind of process is required in France?

    IOW: Have the lunatics overtaken the asylum already?

    1. Re:How likely is this to become law, exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/howeer/however ... sorry.

      Another interesting issue is that laws tend to be made "after the fact", so the authorities have most likely already aquired necessary skills/tools, practised the use of them, attempted to use some of these techniques, or actually used them irl.