Slashdot Mirror


Congresswoman and Staff Gunned Down

tkprit writes "What a shame that a Congresswoman makes herself available to her constituents and she and six of her staff were gunned down for the effort. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona was shot, along with members of her staff, for trying to hear the concerns of the people she represents." CNN reports that at least 12 people were shot by the gunman. According to NPR, "The suspect ran off and was tackled by a bystander. He was taken into custody. Witnesses described him as in his late teens or early 20s." Update: 01/08 20:07 GMT by S : Other sources are reporting she's still in surgery, and early reports have been amended to list Congresswoman Giffords in critical condition.

10 of 2,166 comments (clear)

  1. Dude. by Pojut · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:Dude. by Z8 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Can you give sources for your Washington and Jefferson quotes? These websites claim those quotes were actually fabricated by pro-gun websites.

    2. Re:Dude. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thank you, but I already have a pretty good collection of historical material. Among them is an excellent collection of The Federalist Papers, which also contain writings that support my position.

      My quotes (other than the two that turned out to be misquotes, which I admitted and corrected) are accurate, and they are anything but out of context. In Jefferson's letter, for example, he was discussing precisely the topic we have been discussing here. The same with the quote from Blackstone, and North Carolina's Declaration. There is no error of context on my part.

      I have to repeat this question, as I have to others: if the Second Amendment did not refer to an individual right to carry arms, then why did the Supreme Court rule that it did, just last year? The reason they did is because that is what the historical record clearly shows that it meant. There is no mistake.

  2. Palin by philj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seems somebody looked at the gun sights on this http://www.alan.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/sarahpac_0.jpg and acted on it. Scary.

  3. Re:Ban guns by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Part of gun safety is storing guns in a manner that makes it difficult for people to steal them or for children to use them without adult supervision. A lot of guns used by criminals are stolen from law-abiding citizens' homes, who were not using a gun safe; a lot of school shootings involve guns that children take from their parents, which were not kept locked.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  4. Website by crumbz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sarah Palin just took down her USA Map with targets drawn over democratic leaders, one of them was for Gabrielle Giffords.

  5. Re:Ban guns by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This was an assassination, asshole. Education about gun safety had nothing to do with it.

    Indeed. This is what happens when you have prominent candidates for major political office throwing ad hominem attacks at their opponents, telling people the world will end unless they win, and advocating violent insurrection if they don't win. At least three Tea Party candidates advocated actions like what happened today:

    It's inevitable. If your rhetoric involves implying that violent acts are an acceptable means of political pressure, some percentage of people will believe your bulls**t, and eventually, somebody will take it too far. It's okay to disagree. It's not okay to act like these Tea Party idiots acted in this election season. When you act that way, events like those of today are what you get.

    If there is any justice in the world, the three political candidates above will be arrested promptly and charged with treason.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  6. Re:Ban guns by arikol · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, the thing is, if people don't generally walk around with specially designed murder weapons in their pockets, then the police has less need of deadly weapons as well.
    This means that:
    a) police may not carry a gun (guns kept in a locked chamber in the boot of the patrol car, for emergencies only) or that only special forces carry guns.
    or b)police carry guns but don't grab their gun at the first sign of a disturbance.

    See, the US also has a little problem of accidental shootings by police, which is almost unheard of in the western world. There was an incident where this happened in the UK in a train station and is still being discussed. The accidental shooting of a citizen by police actually makes international headlines in other parts of the world. In the US it barely makes the local news unless it was a well off white person. Not really news, you see.

    I remember being in Tulsa, OK, and in the next street to me a dude got shot due to some gang/drug issue. I didn't see anything about it even on the local news... I mean, WTF?

  7. Re:Ban guns by haeger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The thing is, Sweden has actually quite strict gun laws. You have to be a hunter or an active member of a gun club to own a gun. If you don't go to the gun club often and practice/compete, your licence will be revoked. Generally you give it to the police, or sell it, or the police will come pick it up for you if you break the law by having it without license. I believe there will also be some legal aftermath from that.
    I think that if you're a hunter the license is unlimited in time but you can only buy hunting rifles. And if your doctor notices that you have a drug problem you'll lose the license. Someone with a hunting license could probably clear this up a bit as I'm uncertain.
    So, would you concider Sweden, or most/all scandinavian countries as opressive? Like limiting the press or other freedoms?

    And we have quite an open society where most politicians regularly meet "the people". Not at all what you described.

    Another funny thing. We actually have more guns per capita than the US has. And yet we have very few shootings. Most murders here are done with a knife or blunt force.
    I think there's something in the US culture that glorifies guns and their use, which makes this a much bigger problem there than here. Probably some manliness issue that sais that you have to be the biggest and strongest at all times, and the guy with the biggest gun is the strongest. And I think you have a social problem that aggravates this, meaning that when people have very limited options they'll use whatever resort they can to improve their situation.

    This from my limitied view here overseas. I'm sure I've fallen for a few myths and misconceptions, but I try to keep up on current events, even in the US.

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
  8. Re:Um, I guess neither I nor any of my colleagues by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    no

    admit the right has engaged in irresponsible violent rhetoric. your one example does not negate that fact. in fact, when obama said that, mccain accused him of... drum roll please... irresponsible violent rhetoric

    the point is that obama's one moronic statement does not excuse the volumes of violent words the right has unleashed. the point is, obama was wrong, and the right is wrong

    what i want to see is someone on the right saying their use of violent rhetoric is wrong, that crazy people are out there listening and it irresponsible for someone with a large audience to engage in the verbiage they do

    i want to here that

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it