Catching Exam Cheats With a Spectrum Analyzer
angry tapir writes "Police in Taiwan have used a set of spectrum analyzers to catch at least three people suspected of cheating on an exam by monitoring them for mobile phone signals. Officers used three FSH4 analyzers specially configured by the German manufacturer Rohde & Schwarz to monitor an exam in south Taiwan for prospective government workers."
I have lived outside our Western culture for a while now, and there is a big difference in the idea of tests and examinations. We have the idea that the test is there to see who is competent to get the job. Simple, right? Nope, it's our own cultural biases that make us think this way. Elsewhere, it's all about getting what comes after the test. Your actual skill is irrelevant, not really a worthy topic of discussion. It's all about the job that you can get, or the university that you can get into, or whatever. The idea that if you don't have the skills then you're not qualified doesn't translate. Eastern cultures have a long history of examinations and take a different view than we do. I know a teacher who, after repeatedly warning against cheating in his class, was fired for daring to catch his students cheating in class. The students lost face, you see, and the teacher (not the students' cheating) was identified as the cause of the problem. True story.
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
Catch more of them!
I'm sick of the widespread mentality that cheating is not only desirable but necessary, and that if done for the purpose of "getting ahead", it's alright. I sure wouldn't want a doctor or a lawyer who cheated their way through. I want one who took every test honestly and demonstrated they actually learned the material.
Maybe if we put back the concept of "Cheat or lie (as an adult) once, career suicide for good", we could eliminate this crap. It's infected everything from police to politicians, and programmers to paramedics. If we can find better ways to ensure people actually know what the hell they're doing, instead of demonstrating they can read letters from a cheat sheet, good.
Though, part of the blame also lies with those who design the tests. Multiple choice and fill in the blank tests are obsolete. The best tests would give the taker a project to do, and should be made difficult enough that collaboration is allowed and encouraged. After all, in real world scenarios, collaboration and the ability to research are important skills at nearly everything. As an alternative, one could at the very least give essay questions that would require careful thought and don't have a single "right answer" that can be copied in.
Of course, that takes more effort to grade than running a bunch of sheets through a reader. Imagine that, giving something actual thought.
To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
And, when drunk driving laws were first introduced, simply having a BAC above a certain number was not enough to guarantee a DUI conviction- they had to actually prove you were impaired.
But then MADD pushed to make it a 'per se' law- meaning just having a Blood Alcohol Content above a certain number was enough to make you guilty. Doesn't matter if you are a hardcore drinker and .090 barely makes you buzzed- you're illegal. Meanwhile, that 110-pound girl over there who's never drank before and is obviously crocked out of her gourd? She's only .075, and is perfectly legal.
The point being- laws which start of well meaning, often are twisted into draconian parodies of themselves. It would not surprise me in the slightest if the rule against 'cheating on a test with a cell phone' morphs into 'having a cell phone during a test'. After all, maybe you erased the incriminatory text messages before handing it over, or maybe you were about to cheat....
I've presented homework projects, along with a critique of the list of answers I noticed the TA left lying in the study area, and carefully did expanded work to show that I'd personally masterd the material and gone beyond those answers. It was very embarassing to the TA, who should never have been hired, but also embarassing to the professor because my paper was presented to the class as a whole as part of a surprise presentation program, and as soon as I presented the copy of the list of answers, I was kicked out of the room. It took a direct and unscheduled meeting with the professor, whose secretary kept messing up my scheduled appointments, to present him with my actual paper for review: my TA had rejected it outright and never shown it to him for any review or signing.
Sadly, my aggressiveness in demonstrating the ease and presence of cheating was accepted by the professor, but it was clear that the middle management and underlings in his department accepted it as part of standard practice, and "they would evaluate" whether students were fit to graduate, rather than actually using the tests. They let me know, after their problems with the professor with this, that they would jeopardize my funding and my PhD if this ever went further.
So, I can mention it anonymously on Slashdot, but if I told the relevant Dean at the time, I'd probably never graduate.