Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Slams Google Over HTML5 Video Decision

jbrodkin writes "Microsoft is accusing Google of some heavy-handed tactics in the battle over HTML5 video standards. In an attempt at humor, a clearly peeved Microsoft official wrote 'An Open Letter from the President of the United States of Google,' which likens Google's adoption of WebM instead of H.264 to an attempt to force a new language on the entire world. Internet Explorer 9, of course, supports the H.264 codec, while Google and Mozilla are backing WebM. The hyperlinks in Microsoft's blog post lead readers to data indicating that two-thirds of Web videos are using H.264, with about another 25% using Flash VP6. However, the data, from Encoding.com, was released before the launch of WebM last May. One pundit predicts the battle will lead to yet another 'years-long standards format war.'"

2 of 453 comments (clear)

  1. 66% + 25% by gbjbaanb · · Score: 5, Informative

    The hyperlinks in Microsoft's blog post lead readers to data indicating that two-thirds of Web videos are using H.264, with about another 25% using Flash VP6

    yes, but once Google updates Youtube to only use WebM, I guess that'll show 91% of all online video to be in WebM format.

    I wonder what Microsoft will say then?

  2. Re:competition by Kjella · · Score: 5, Informative

    BESIDES the licensing fees will disappear very soon. MPEG1/2/JPEG are already public domain if I recall correctly, and MPEG4/H264 will soon be an open standard too

    MPEG1? Check.
    MPEG2? *bzzzzzzzzt* 2023.
    JPEG? Yep, was never patented to begin with.
    H.264 soon? Well, if 2027 is soon.

    And you didn't mention MP3, but that is 2012/2017 depending if you think the submarine patents are valid or not.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings