Slashdot Mirror


New Mega-Leak Reveals Middle East Peace Process

An anonymous reader writes "There's been yet another mega-leak, this time of 1,600 papers describing the Israeli/Palestinian peace process negotiations. It's independent of Wikileaks and came to light via al-Jazeera, showing perhaps that the mega-leak meme is here to stay whatever happens to Assange. The papers show a weak Palestinian side offering ever greater concessions to Israel, which flatly rejected this as being insufficient: 'We do not like this suggestion because it does not meet our demands,' Israel's then foreign minister, Tzipi Livni, told the Palestinians, 'and probably it was not easy for you to think about it, but I really appreciate it.'"

15 of 760 comments (clear)

  1. Its really by alexborges · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A whole new game, ain't it now?

    --
    NO SIG
    1. Re:Its really by hoggoth · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You go ahead and forge 1,600 documents involving hundreds or thousands of players that intermingles hundreds of verifiable meetings and facts with your fake counter-intelligence. Good luck with that.

      The only chance of actually pulling off something like that would be if you actually got your hands on 1,600 real leaked documents and carefully wove a thread of fake edits throughout it. Oh, and hope nobody ELSE can get the same leak of 1,600 documents that contradict yours.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    2. Re:Its really by jamesh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For sure. It completely baffles me how anyone can have a strong opinion on any issue when they are only fed the information via the mainstream media. War on Terrorism is the main one that springs to mind - so many people wanting the US (and everyone else) out of there and obviously feeling very strongly about it, having only read about it in mainstream media and maybe a few forums. Maybe they're right, maybe there are a whole load of valid reasons why we shouldn't be over there, but how can they know for sure when they are just repeating 'popular opinion'???

      Even wikileaks leaves itself wide open to astroturfing with manufactured 'leaks' to suit someone's agenda. It doesn't even have to go that far if someone somewhere is deciding what to leak and what to bury.

      I don't have a better solution, but it does kind of bug me...

    3. Re:Its really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. Notice who looks bad in this situation, and WHO ended up with the leak.

      After watching the 'peace' process break down again and again here. You have to realize *NEITHER* side is really interested in it. It doesnt even take 'digging into it' much to realize this.

      A leak that makes Israel look bad and it comes thru Al-Jazeera color me shocked. This would be like seeing a leak that makes the GOP look bad coming from CNN/MSNBC, or the democrats look bad coming from FoxNews. Those 'news' organizations are about 'if it bleeds it leads' and 'targeting the core audience'. Not about news. I guarantee within the next month or two will be another 'leak' that shows the other side is just as bad. My money is it coming thru CNN and/or FoxNews.

      These are like two children who are fighting over a toy that neither one really wants. You need to pick them both up take the toy away knock their heads together and say 'play nice and dont make me come back in here'.

    4. Re:Its really by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yeah? Well take a look at Al-Jazeera and then take a look at CNN. With CNN, we have in the second row:

      What a first week
      An eclectic mix of superstar guests this week talked with Piers Morgan about love, war and everything in between.
      Stern: I don't like Jay Leno Video
      Rice: Be ready for 3 a.m. call Video
      Oprah: I'm never getting married"

      Al-Jazeera, who may be biased and ignore pop culture B.S. on the front page; or CNN and FoxNews who give priority to celebrity diversion. I can't take credit for pointing that out, that comparison was brought to light in 4chan's /b/ years ago...and it still hasn't changed.

      Harumph, idiot America.

    5. Re:Its really by lixee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Look...I am from a Muslim country and I can assure you that Fox News is pretty benign compared to Al Jazeera. Maybe you don't watch Al Jazeera in Arabic. It's full of conspiracy theories. Even on the Arab-Israeli issue, I would say that that Fox is less biased than Al Jazeera. I know it's hard to imagine when one ever watched Limbaugh or O'Reilly, but it's sadly verifiable.

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
  2. We do not like this suggestion because by unity100 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "we are the the most psychopath right wing coalition that can ever come into being in a country through a democratic process", Tzipi Livni should have said.

    no really, its beyond fathoming, the nature and formation of this ungodly coalition is. my israeli friend (colleague too) says that the exterior minister of this coalition, liebermann, is known as outright mafia in israel. not in a manner of speaking, but, literally. he says the entire coalition is filled with similar right wing zealots and psychos, came to being as a coalition government only through an unholy alliance they have set up among each other after the scattered elections. they, naturally, dont even reflect the true will of the majority of israeli people.

    its no surprise to me to hear these leaks, after being told about the situation in israel and nature of these people by my friend, tho it may be worthy of news to some people.

  3. Re:Good lord... by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We tend to underestimate the longevity of a grudge in the rest of the world.

          The rest of the world? I constantly have World War I and II shoved into my British face by every American I meet. We've had almost 100 years of "You would be speaking German if it wasn't for us". So I wouldn't limit grudges to "the rest of the world" only.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  4. Re:Good lord... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, because it's not like the Jews or Muslim to carry a grudge for hundreds of years, right?

    I appreciate what you are saying, but don't forget that the Muslim-Jewish problem in the Middle East is a new one.* It predates the establishment of Israel in 1948, but only by a few decades. It really started with the start of mass immigration by European Jewry in the early 20th century and didn't really get going until after WWI.

    * You can find instances of conflict throughout history, but they were minor in comparison with Muslim-Christian and Christian-Jewish conflict over the centuries.

  5. Re:Adaptation and Propaganda by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How long before the world's secret services adapt to the "megaleak" phenomenon, and start using it as a tool to spread propaganda?

    What do you mean "start"? False flag and disinformation campaigns have been a staple of foreign policy for at least as long as recorded history.

  6. Re:Good lord... by whitehaint · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Huh? Perhaps I am misinterpreting what you said, but it appears you are saying Israel, a nation which defines itself as inherently Jewish has separated religion from state?

  7. Re:Jews: 3,700 years of not living cooperatively by KugelKurt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And I guess Hitler killing millions of Jews was their fault too, eh?

    If you ask an ultra orthodox Jew, you might even get a Yes as answer. A minority opinion among them is that European Jews were punished by god for not living orthodox.
    (Just to be clear: I don't agree with that. I merely wanted to answer your question.)

  8. Re:Jews: 3,700 years of not living cooperatively by KugelKurt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Um, there were no Jews 3,700 years ago. A monotheistic religion that would later become Judaism was just getting started. Even the first "proto Jews" weren't strictly monotheistic (the Hebrew Bible / Old Testament contains fragments of polytheism, eg. Psalm 82) which -- at least by today's standards -- would not qualify them as Jews...

    As for your Pharaoh comment: There is not a single piece of archeological evidence that hundreds of thousands of people migrated away from Egypt and wandered through the desert for 40 years.
    So either the Exodus never happened and the story is just made up or the ancient people of Israel were the cleanest people ever by not leaving any pottery, weapons, etc. behind....

  9. except for state welfare for ultra-orthodox by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Interesting

    , I'd say they're probably more secular than the US in reality,

    They have complete freedom of religion

    Riiiight. Pay no attention to the fact that TWO THIRDS of ultra-orthodox men live on welfare and don't work (and amongst the women, 50% don't work, whereas 25% in general Israeli population don't.) If you elect to go into such studies, the government gives you automatic welfare AND excuses you from military service (where it is ordinarily compulsory) AND gives you a complete tax break.

    Did I mention that these ultra-orthodox freeloaders are causing most of the upheaval and supporting hard-line policies? And multiplying like rabbits, marrying young and having huge families?

    If that's "Secular", then I guess you'd be OK with the federal government giving welfare to people who decide to become ultra-right-wing Christians?

  10. Re:Jews: 3,700 years of not living cooperatively by silentcoder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "of course, the old accounts also describe Amazon warriors."

    You do realize that there is significant evidence that at least part of the Amazon myth is based on reality right ? Genetic evidence at that. Based on the oldest writings about them - they had entered Europe and Greece from the Russian Steppes to which they later returned. In the steppes are Burial Mounds in which were found the bodies of woman with the adornments of warriors. That's already a big hint.
    It gets better, we know for a fact that the people who lived in those parts of the steppes later migrated from Russia toward Asia - and were the ancestors of Genghis Kahn's hordes. To this day their descendants expect women to fight as well as men - and here it gets really interesting. A small minority of Mongol children are born as blonds, and as far as we know - it's only EVER daughters. Apparently suggesting a female-only gene that causes blondness in a small minority. Genetic testing of some of them found a clear mitochondrial DNA link (that is maternal only) with the bodies found in the Steppes.

    It's not absolute, nothing in science ever really is - and less so in archeology because evidence is *always* incredibly sparse, but right now the evidence we do have, suggests that at least part of the amazon legend as written by the first Greek historians was, in fact, true.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *